World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
13532
World Ranking
12923
National Ranking
3417

J. J. Dannenberg publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. J. Dannenberg sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 172 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

J. J. Dannenberg D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. J. Dannenberg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. J. Dannenberg is affiliated with the City University of New York in the United States. Their scholarly activity is primarily situated within this institution, contributing to the academic community through various research endeavors.

Details regarding publications by J. J. Dannenberg do not include recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues. Similarly, there is no available information on book publications or awards related to this researcher.

The profile does not list specific main fields of study, subfields, or main topics associated with their work, indicating that such categorization has not been explicitly documented or made publicly accessible in the current source data.

Overall, J. J. Dannenberg's academic footprint is closely tied to their role at the City University of New York, though further granular details about their research output or thematic focus are not present in the available data.

Best Publications

  • How does basis set superposition error change the potential surfaces for hydrogen-bonded dimers?

    Sílvia Simon;Miquel Duran;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Definition of the hydrogen bond (IUPAC Recommendations 2011)

    Elangannan Arunan;Gautam R. Desiraju;Roger A. Klein;Joanna Sadlej

  • Defining the hydrogen bond: An account (IUPAC Technical Report)

    Elangannan Arunan;Gautam R. Desiraju;Roger A. Klein;Joanna Sadlej

  • Correcting for basis set superposition error in aggregates containing more than two molecules: Ambiguities in the calculation of the counterpoise correction

    Laszlo Turi;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Cooperative Hydrogen-Bonding in Adenine−Thymine and Guanine−Cytosine Base Pairs. Density Functional Theory and Møller−Plesset Molecular Orbital Study

    Amparo Asensio;Nadya Kobko;J. J. Dannenberg

  • C-H Bond-Shortening upon Hydrogen Bond Formation: Influence of an Electric Field

    Artëm Masunov and;J. J. Dannenberg;Rubén H. Contreras

  • Cooperativity in amide hydrogen bonding chains: implications for protein-folding models.

    Kobko N;Paraskevas L;del Rio E;Dannenberg Jj

  • H-Bonding Cooperativity and Energetics of α-Helix Formation of Five 17-Amino Acid Peptides

    Robert Wieczorek;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Oxidation potentials of α-aminoalkyl radicals: bond dissociation energies for related radical cations

    Danial D.M. Wayner;Danial D.M. Wayner;Joseph J. Dannenberg;Joseph J. Dannenberg;David Griller;David Griller

  • Cooperativity in Amide Hydrogen Bonding Chains. Relation between Energy, Position, and H-Bond Chain Length in Peptide and Protein Folding Models

    Nadya Kobko;J. J. Dannenberg

  • A comparison of the behavior of functional/basis set combinations for hydrogen-bonding in the water dimer with emphasis on basis set superposition error.

    Joshua A. Plumley;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Theoretical Study of the Enolic Forms of Acetylacetone. How Strong Is the Hydrogen Bond

    J. J. Dannenberg;Raphael Rios

  • Alternative Chelator for 89Zr Radiopharmaceuticals: Radiolabeling and Evaluation of 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)

    Melissa A. Deri;Shashikanth Ponnala;Shashikanth Ponnala;Brian M. Zeglis;Gabor Pohl

  • Molecular orbital study of acetic acid aggregation. 1. Monomers and dimers

    Laszlo Turi;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Molecular orbital studies of C-H...O H-bonded complexes

    Laszlo Turi;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Effect of Basis Set Superposition Error on the Water Dimer Surface Calculated at Hartree-Fock, Møller-Plesset, and Density Functional Theory Levels

    Sílvia Simon;Miquel Duran;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Theoretical Study of Urea and Thiourea. 2. Chains and Ribbons

    Artëm Masunov and;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Effect of Basis Set Superposition Error (BSSE) upon ab Initio Calculations of Organic Transition States

    Nadya Kobko;J. J. Dannenberg

  • Are Hydrogen Bonds Covalent or Electrostatic? A Molecular Orbital Comparison of Molecules in Electric Fields and H-Bonding Environments

    J. J. Dannenberg;Laury Haskamp;Artëm Masunov

  • Hydrogen-Bond Cooperativity, Vibrational Coupling, and Dependence of Helix Stability on Changes in Amino Acid Sequence in Small 310-Helical Peptides. A Density Functional Theory Study

    Robert Wieczorek;J. J. Dannenberg

  • The Nature of the Hydrogen Bond: Outline of a Comprehensive Hydrogen Bond Theory

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Miquel Duran
Miquel Duran University of Girona
Artëm E. Masunov
Artëm E. Masunov University of Central Florida
Robert H. Crabtree
Robert H. Crabtree Yale University
Ibon Alkorta
Ibon Alkorta Spanish National Research Council
Steve Scheiner
Steve Scheiner Utah State University
Gautam R. Desiraju
Gautam R. Desiraju Indian Institute of Science
Juan Bertrán
Juan Bertrán Royal Military College of Canada
David C. Clary
David C. Clary University of Oxford
Henrik G. Kjaergaard
Henrik G. Kjaergaard University of Copenhagen
David J. Nesbitt
David J. Nesbitt University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of career paths, many of which can be pursued through online degrees. For those interested in combining legal and scientific expertise, exploring what types of paralegals make the most money can guide you toward specialized roles that value a chemistry background.

Another promising direction is into pharmaceutical sales. Understanding the science behind medications can significantly enhance your prospects. Learn more about the pharma sales rep salary and career paths to weigh the benefits of this role.

If you prefer clinical work, becoming a pharmacist is a natural extension of a chemistry degree. It's important to review the pharmacist education requirements to understand the necessary qualifications and certifications involved.

For those fascinated by forensic science, a career as an autopsy technician might be appealing. This role combines chemistry knowledge with investigative skills. Check details about the autopsy technician salary and job outlook to consider this pathway.

Best Scientists Citing J. J. Dannenberg

Recently Published Articles