World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Günter Schmid

Günter Schmid

Award Badge
Chemistry
Hungary
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
22201
World Ranking
7529
National Ranking
8

Günter Schmid publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Schmid sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 339 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Günter Schmid D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Schmid sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Chemistry in Hungary Leader Award

Best Publications

  • Size-Dependent Cytotoxicity of Gold Nanoparticles

    Yu Pan;Sabine Neuss;Annika Leifert;Monika Fischler

  • Low-voltage organic transistors with an amorphous molecular gate dielectric

    Marcus Halik;Hagen Klauk;Ute Zschieschang;Günter Schmid

  • Gold nanoparticles of diameter 1.4 nm trigger necrosis by oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage.

    Yu Pan;Annika Leifert;David Ruau;Sabine Neuss

  • Au55[P(C6H5)3]12CI6 — ein Goldcluster ungewöhnlicher Größe

    Günter Schmid;Reinhard Pfeil;Roland Boese;Friedhelm Bandermann

  • Biodistribution of 1.4‐ and 18‐nm Gold Particles in Rats

    Manuela Semmler-Behnke;Wolfgang G. Kreyling;Jens Lipka;Stefanie Fertsch

  • Particle size-dependent and surface charge-dependent biodistribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration.

    Stephanie Hirn;Manuela Semmler-Behnke;Carsten Schleh;Alexander Wenk

  • Current and future applications of nanoclusters

    Günter Schmid;Monika Bäumle;Marcus Geerkens;Ingo Heim

  • Clusters and colloids : from theory to applications

    Unknown

  • Metal Clusters and Colloids

    Günter Schmid;Lifeng F. Chi

  • Pentacene organic transistors and ring oscillators on glass and on flexible polymeric substrates

    Hagen Klauk;Marcus Halik;Ute Zschieschang;Florian Eder

  • Cellular Uptake and Toxicity of Au55 Clusters

    Maria Tsoli;Hubert Kuhn;Wolfgang Brandau;Helmut Esche

  • Size and surface charge of gold nanoparticles determine absorption across intestinal barriers and accumulation in secondary target organs after oral administration

    Carsten Schleh;Manuela Semmler-Behnke;Jens Lipka;Alexander Wenk

  • Nanoparticulated Gold: Syntheses, Structures, Electronics, and Reactivities

    Unknown

  • The relevance of shape and size of Au55 clusters

    Unknown

  • Metal nanoclusters in catalysis and materials science : The issue of size control {1st ed.}

    Benedetto. Corain;Günter Schmid;Naoki. Toshima

  • Selective Electroreduction of CO2 toward Ethylene on Nano Dendritic Copper Catalysts at High Current Density

    Unknown

  • Positively Charged Iridium(III) Triazole Derivatives as Blue Emitters for Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells

    Mathias Mydlak;Claudia Bizzarri;David Hartmann;Wiebke Sarfert

  • Air-Blood-Barrier Translocation of Tracheally Instilled Gold Nanoparticles Inversely Depends on Particle Size

    Wolfgang G Kreyling;Stephanie Hirn;Winfried Möller;Carsten Schleh

  • Ligand‐Stabilized Bimetallic Colloids Identified by HRTEM and EDX

    Günter Schmid;Andreas Lehnert;Jan-Olle Malm;Jan-Olov Bovin

  • Template Guided Self-Assembly of [Au55] Clusters on Nanolithographically Defined Monolayer Patterns

    Shantang Liu;Rivka Maoz;Günter Schmid;Jacob Sagiv

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcus Halik
Marcus Halik University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ute Zschieschang
Ute Zschieschang Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Hagen Klauk
Hagen Klauk Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Karl Johann Jakob Mayrhofer
Karl Johann Jakob Mayrhofer Forschungszentrum Jülich
Ralf Moos
Ralf Moos University of Bayreuth
Franz Effenberger
Franz Effenberger University of Stuttgart
Oliver Hayden
Oliver Hayden Technical University of Munich
Luisa De Cola
Luisa De Cola University of Strasbourg
Simon Thiele
Simon Thiele Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg
Peter Fischer
Peter Fischer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Chemistry opens doors to various specialized careers that blend science with practical applications. For those interested in healthcare and medication, understanding how much does it cost to become a pharmacist is crucial, as pharmacy careers require focused education and significant investment.

If your interests lean towards forensic science, many students explore options like autopsy technician school to get hands-on experience with scientific investigation techniques. This path often combines chemistry knowledge with anatomy and pathology.

For those considering flexible learning options, several programs offer online forensic science courses. These affordable online degrees make it easier to enter forensic careers without relocating or putting your life on hold.

Additionally, advanced studies such as an online masters degree in forensic psychology allow students to combine chemistry knowledge with psychology to contribute to criminal justice more effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Günter Schmid