World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 37 8662 479 63 12093

Francesco Fera publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francesco Fera between 1997 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francesco Fera published across 20 years, from 1997 to 2016, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2006. 3 of the 64 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2006. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication
1997 2016

64 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francesco Fera: publications per year, 1997 to 2016
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 6
2002 8
2003 3
2004 3
2005 7
2006 9
2007 4
2008 4
2009 5
2010 3
2011 1
2012 1
2013 3
2014 2
2015 2
2016 1
Total 64
Download as CSV

Francesco Fera publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Fera sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 58–67 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193 63
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Francesco Fera D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Fera sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 37
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Francesco Fera was affiliated with Magna Graecia University in Italy. Their research spanned multiple disciplines, primarily within the spheres of Arts and Humanities as well as Business, Management and Accounting.

Their work covered topics including Architecture, Art, Education and Management, Economics, and Public Policy. These thematic focuses reflect an interdisciplinary approach, engaging with both creative and administrative aspects of scholarly inquiry.

Publications by Francesco Fera included contributions to peer-reviewed journals and academic books. One notable paper was titled "Modellare il "funnel della comunicazione" di un progetto di ricerca: l'esempio del Pilota Puglia GATEKEEPER," published in 2021 in Quaderni di Comunicazione Scientifica.

  • Modellare il "funnel della comunicazione" di un progetto di ricerca: l'esempio del Pilota Puglia GATEKEEPER, 2021, Quaderni di Comunicazione Scientifica

In addition to journal articles, Fera authored a book published by Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura eBooks. The work, titled "The initial challenge of the project.: Scope of an intermediate academic level of architectural projects: Bologna, Guimarães, Porto, Valladolid" was released in 2020.

  • The initial challenge of the project.: Scope of an intermediate academic level of architectural projects: Bologna, Guimarães, Porto, Valladolid, 2020

Frequent co-authors in Fera's research included Eusebio Alonso García, Francisco Javier Blanco Martín, Madalena Pinto da Silva, Luca Conti, and Ivo Oliveira. Collaborations with these scholars were evidenced by joint publications.

  • Eusebio Alonso García
  • Francisco Javier Blanco Martín
  • Madalena Pinto da Silva
  • Luca Conti
  • Ivo Oliveira

The primary venue for Fera's published work was the journal Quaderni di Comunicazione Scientifica, which featured multiple contributions.

  • Quaderni di Comunicazione Scientifica

Best Publications

  • Serotonin Transporter Genetic Variation and the Response of the Human Amygdala

    Ahmad R. Hariri;Venkata S. Mattay;Alessandro Tessitore;Bhaskar Kolachana

  • The Amygdala Response to Emotional Stimuli: A Comparison of Faces and Scenes

    Ahmad R. Hariri;Alessandro Tessitore;Venkata S. Mattay;Francesco Fera

  • Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine.

    Venkata S. Mattay;Terry E. Goldberg;Francesco Fera;Ahmad R. Hariri

  • Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli

    Ahmad R Hariri;Venkata S Mattay;Alessandro Tessitore;Francesco Fera

  • Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in human motor function

    V.S. Mattay;F. Fera;A. Tessitore;A.R. Hariri

  • Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in working memory capacity.

    Venkata. S. Mattay;Francesco Fera;Alessandro Tessitore;Ahmad R. Hariri

  • MR imaging index for differentiation of progressive supranuclear palsy from Parkinson disease and the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy.

    Aldo Quattrone;Giuseppe Nicoletti;Demetrio Messina;Francesco Fera

  • Dopamine Modulates the Response of the Human Amygdala: A Study in Parkinson's Disease

    Alessandro Tessitore;Ahmad R. Hariri;Francesco Fera;William G. Smith

  • Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the middle cerebellar peduncle differentiate the Parkinson variant of MSA from Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy

    Giuseppe Nicoletti;Raffaele Lodi;Francesca Condino;Caterina Tonon

  • Functional changes in the activity of brain regions underlying emotion processing in the elderly

    Alessandro Tessitore;Ahmad R. Hariri;Ahmad R. Hariri;Francesco Fera;Francesco Fera;William G. Smith

  • Dextroamphetamine modulates the response of the human amygdala

    Ahmad R Hariri;Venkata S Mattay;Alessandro Tessitore;Francesco Fera

  • Gross morphology and morphometric sequelae in the hippocampus, fornix, and corpus callosum of patients with severe non-missile traumatic brain injury without macroscopically detectable lesions: a T1 weighted MRI study.

    F Tomaiuolo;G A Carlesimo;M Di Paola;M Petrides

  • Monoamine oxidase-a genetic variations influence brain activity associated with inhibitory control: new insight into the neural correlates of impulsivity.

    Luca Passamonti;Francesco Fera;Angela Magariello;Antonio Cerasa

  • Randomized trial comparing two different high doses of methylprednisolone in MS A clinical and MRI study

    R. L. Oliveri;P. Valentino;C. Russo;G. Sibilia

  • Transverse sinus stenoses persist after normalization of the CSF pressure in IIH.

    F Bono;C Giliberto;C Mastrandrea;D Cristiano

  • Neural Mechanisms Underlying Probabilistic Category Learning in Normal Aging

    Francesco Fera;Thomas W. Weickert;Terry E. Goldberg;Alessandro Tessitore;Alessandro Tessitore

  • MR imaging of middle cerebellar peduncle width: differentiation of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson disease.

    Giuseppe Nicoletti;Francesco Fera;Francesca Condino;William Auteri

  • Neurobiological mechanisms underlying emotional processing in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

    Luca Passamonti;Antonio Cerasa;Maria Liguori;Maria Cecilia Gioia

  • Altered cortical-cerebellar circuits during verbal working memory in essential tremor

    Luca Passamonti;Fabiana Novellino;Antonio Cerasa;Carmelina Chiriaco

  • Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis predicts IIH without papilledema in patients with migraine.

    F. Bono;D. Messina;C. Giliberto;D. Cristiano

  • Increased functional connectivity within mesocortical networks in open people.

    Luca Passamonti;A. Terracciano;R. Riccelli;G. Donzuso

Frequent Co-Authors

Aldo Quattrone
Aldo Quattrone Magna Graecia University
Antonio Cerasa
Antonio Cerasa National Research Council (CNR)
Alessandro Tessitore
Alessandro Tessitore University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Venkata S. Mattay
Venkata S. Mattay Lieber Institute for Brain Development
Ahmad R. Hariri
Ahmad R. Hariri Duke University
Luca Passamonti
Luca Passamonti University of Cambridge
Daniel R. Weinberger
Daniel R. Weinberger Johns Hopkins University
Umberto Aguglia
Umberto Aguglia Magna Graecia University
Joseph H. Callicott
Joseph H. Callicott National Institutes of Health
Antonio Gambardella
Antonio Gambardella Magna Graecia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience students often explore related fields that open a variety of career options in counseling, social work, and psychology. Many universities in the USA now offer flexible online programs that can lead to in-demand professions with a neuroscience foundation.

For those interested in therapy, an online masters MFT (Marriage and Family Therapy) is a popular choice that prepares graduates for roles in mental health counseling and family support. Psychology remains a central pathway, and students frequently ask, how much does masters in psychology cost? Costs and admission requirements vary, but online offerings provide more affordable and flexible study options.

If budget is a concern, researching the most affordable online psychology degree programs is a good step to limit student debt while preparing for psychology careers in research, education, or clinical practice. Another closely related field is social work. Those interested in social advocacy and client support may consider the msw degree online, which equips graduates for roles in healthcare, therapy, and community organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Francesco Fera

Recently Published Articles