World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4092
World Ranking
13667
National Ranking
69

Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 258 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • On the Optimal Design of Triple Modular Redundancy Logic for SRAM-based FPGAs

    F.L. Kastensmidt;L. Sterpone;L. Carro;M.S. Reorda

  • Physical design methodologies for performance predictability and manufacturability

    Ricardo Reis;Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt;José Luís Güntzel

  • Designing fault-tolerant techniques for SRAM-based FPGAs

    F.G. de Lima Kastensmidt;G. Neuberger;R.F. Hentschke;L. Carro

  • Using Bulk Built-in Current Sensors to Detect Soft Errors

    E.H. Neto;I. Ribeiro;M. Vieira;G. Wirth

  • Using Benchmarks for Radiation Testing of Microprocessors and FPGAs

    Heather Quinn;William H. Robinson;Paolo Rech;Miguel Aguirre

  • A High-Fault-Coverage Approach for the Test of Data, Control and Handshake Interconnects in Mesh Networks-on-Chip

    E. Cota;F.L. Kastensmidt;M. Cassel;M. Herve

  • Dependable Network-on-Chip Router Able to Simultaneously Tolerate Soft Errors and Crosstalk

    Arthur Frantz;Fernanda Kastensmidt;Luigi Carro;Erika Cota

  • Fault-Tolerance Techniques for SRAM-Based FPGAs (Frontiers in Electronic Testing)

    Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt;Luigi Carro;Ricardo Reis

  • Synchronizing triple modular redundant designs in dynamic partial reconfiguration applications

    Conrado Pilotto;José Rodrigo Azambuja;Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt

  • Designing and testing fault-tolerant techniques for SRAM-based FPGAs

    Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt;Gustavo Neuberger;Luigi Carro;Ricardo Reis

  • Crosstalk- and SEU-Aware Networks on Chips

    A.P. Frantz;M. Cassel;F.L. Kastensmidt;E. Cota

  • An Analytical Model of the Propagation Induced Pulse Broadening (PIPB) Effects on Single Event Transient in Flash-Based FPGAs

    L. Sterpone;N. Battezzati;F. L. Kastensmidt;R. Chipana

  • Analyzing the Impact of Single-Event-Induced Charge Sharing in Complex Circuits

    S. Pagliarini;F. Kastensmidt;L. Entrena;A. Lindoso

  • Detecting SEEs in Microprocessors Through a Non-Intrusive Hybrid Technique

    J R Azambuja;A Lapolli;L Rosa;F L Kastensmidt

  • Heavy Ions Induced Single Event Upsets Testing of the 28 nm Xilinx Zynq-7000 All Programmable SoC

    Lucas Antunes Tambara;Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt;Nilberto H. Medina;Nemitala Added

  • Lockstep Dual-Core ARM A9: Implementation and Resilience Analysis Under Heavy Ion-Induced Soft Errors

    Adria Barros de Oliveira;Gennaro Severino Rodrigues;Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt;Nemitala Added

  • A fast and scalable fault injection framework to evaluate multi/many-core soft error reliability

    Felipe Rosa;Fernanda Kastensmidt;Ricardo Reis;Luciano Ost

  • Analyzing the Impact of Radiation-Induced Failures in Programmable SoCs

    Lucas Antunes Tambara;Paolo Rech;Eduardo Chielle;Jorge Tonfat

  • Evaluating Soft Core RISC-V Processor in SRAM-Based FPGA Under Radiation Effects

    Adria B. de Oliveira;Lucas A. Tambara;Fabio Benevenuti;Luis A. C. Benites

  • Exploring the use of approximate TMR to mask transient faults in logic with low area overhead

    Iuri A. C. Gomes;Mayler G. A. Martins;André Inácio Reis;Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt

Frequent Co-Authors

Luigi Carro
Luigi Carro Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Jürgen Becker
Jürgen Becker Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Matteo Sonza Reorda
Matteo Sonza Reorda Polytechnic University of Turin
Michael Wirthlin
Michael Wirthlin Brigham Young University
David Kaeli
David Kaeli Northeastern University
Michel Renovell
Michel Renovell Montpellier Laboratory of Informatics, Robotics and Microelectronics
Cristina Silvano
Cristina Silvano Polytechnic University of Milan
Gianluca Palermo
Gianluca Palermo Polytechnic University of Milan
Maurizio Rebaudengo
Maurizio Rebaudengo Polytechnic University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Fernanda Lima Kastensmidt

Recently Published Articles