World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emmanuelle Geslin

Emmanuelle Geslin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 39 6306 5846 476 455 130 4336

Emmanuelle Geslin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emmanuelle Geslin between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emmanuelle Geslin published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 4 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2016. 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emmanuelle Geslin: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 0
2008 2
2009 5
2010 9
2011 6
2012 12
2013 4
2014 12
2015 6
2016 22
2017 5
2018 13
2019 4
2020 8
2021 14
2022 6
2023 6
2024 4
2025 3
2026 1
Total 155
Download as CSV

Emmanuelle Geslin publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuelle Geslin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 130 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557 130
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Emmanuelle Geslin D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuelle Geslin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349 39
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • The FOBIMO (FOraminiferal BIo-MOnitoring) initiative—Towards a standardised protocol for soft-bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring studies

    Joachim Schönfeld;Elisabeth Alve;Emmanuelle Geslin;Frans Jorissen

  • Widespread occurrence of nitrate storage and denitrification among Foraminifera and Gromiida.

    Elisa Piña-Ochoa;Signe Høgslund;Emmanuelle Geslin;Tomas Cedhagen

  • Distribution Trends of Foraminiferal Assemblages in Paralic Environments

    Jean-Pierre Debenay;Jean-Jacques Guillou;Fabrice Redois;Emmanuelle Geslin

  • Morphological abnormalities of foraminiferal tests in Brazilian environments: comparison between polluted and non-polluted areas

    Emmanuelle Geslin;Jean-Pierre Debenay;Wania Duleba;Carla Bonetti

  • Migratory responses of deep-sea benthic foraminifera to variable oxygen conditions: laboratory investigations

    E. Geslin;E. Geslin;P. Heinz;F. Jorissen;Ch. Hemleben

  • ORIGIN OF MORPHOLOGICAL ABNORMALITIES IN AMMONIA (FORAMINIFERA): STUDIES IN LABORATORY AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS

    V. Stouff;E. Geslin;J.-P. Debenay;M. Lesourd

  • Ammonia beccarii and Ammonia tepida (Foraminifera): morphofunctional arguments for their distinction

    Jean-Pierre Debenay;Eric Bénéteau;Jijun Zhang;Véronique Stouff

  • Benthic foraminiferal response to experimentally induced Erika oil pollution

    S.R. Ernst;J. Morvan;E. Geslin;A. Le Bihan

  • Environmental Variation and Foraminiferal Test Abnormalities

    Emmanuelle Geslin;Veronique Stouff;Jean-Pierre Debenay;Maurice Lesourd

  • Abnormal wall textures and test deformation in Ammonia (hyaline foraminifer)

    E. Geslin;J. P. Debenay;M. Lesourd

  • Oxygen respiration rates of benthic foraminifera as measured with oxygen microsensors

    E. Geslin;N. Risgaard-Petersen;Fabien Lombard;E. Metzger

  • Foraminiferal survival after long-term in situ experimentally induced anoxia

    Dewi Langlet;Emmanuelle Geslin;C. Baal;Édouard Metzger

  • Vertical migration, nitrate uptake and denitrification: survival mechanisms of foraminifers (Globobulimina turgida) under low oxygen conditions

    Karoliina A. Koho;Elisa Piña-Ochoa;Emmanuelle Geslin;Nils Risgaard-Petersen

  • Foraminiferal species responses to in situ, experimentally induced anoxia in the Adriatic Sea

    Dewi Langlet;C. Baal;Emmanuelle Geslin;Édouard Metzger

  • Surviving anoxia in marine sediments: The metabolic response of ubiquitous benthic foraminifera (Ammonia tepida).

    Charlotte LeKieffre;Jorge E. Spangenberg;Guillaume Mabilleau;Stéphane Escrig

  • Vertical distribution and respiration rates of benthic foraminifera: Contribution to aerobic remineralization in intertidal mudflats covered by Zostera noltei meadows

    F. Cesbron;E. Geslin;F.J. Jorissen;M.L. Delgard

  • Survival of benthic foraminifera under hypoxic conditions: results of an experimental study using the CellTracker Green method.

    F. Pucci;E. Geslin;C. Barras;C. Morigi;C. Morigi

  • Indicative value of benthic foraminifera for biomonitoring: Assignment to ecological groups of sensitivity to total organic carbon of species from European intertidal areas and transitional waters.

    Vincent M.P. Bouchet;Fabrizio Frontalini;Fabio Francescangeli;Pierre-Guy Sauriau

  • Ultrastructure and distribution of kleptoplasts in benthic foraminifera from shallow-water (photic) habitats

    Thierry Jauffrais;Charlotte LeKieffre;Karoliina A. Koho;Masashi Tsuchiya

  • Effect of light on photosynthetic efficiency of sequestered chloroplasts in intertidal benthic foraminifera ( Haynesina germanica and Ammonia tepida )

    Thierry Jauffrais;Bruno Jesus;Bruno Jesus;Edouard Metzger;Jean-Luc Mouget

Frequent Co-Authors

Frans Jorissen
Frans Jorissen University of Angers
Anders Meibom
Anders Meibom École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Nils Risgaard-Petersen
Nils Risgaard-Petersen Aarhus University
Jean-Pierre Debenay
Jean-Pierre Debenay University of Angers
Martin Zuschin
Martin Zuschin University of Vienna
Joan M. Bernhard
Joan M. Bernhard Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Helena L. Filipsson
Helena L. Filipsson Lund University
Jean-Claude Duplessy
Jean-Claude Duplessy Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jadran Faganeli
Jadran Faganeli University of Ljubljana
Elisabeth Alve
Elisabeth Alve University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science often opens the door to diverse career paths and educational opportunities. For those interested in interdisciplinary skills, a degree in library science can complement geological research by enhancing data organization and information management abilities.

Visual documentation plays a crucial role in Earth Science fields like environmental monitoring and geology. Pursuing online photography degrees offers a practical way to improve photographic skills, with options tailored to different budgets and needs.

Veterans seeking to transition into Earth Science or related creative fields may find value in a veteran friendly online photography degree, which provides flexible and supportive learning environments suited for military backgrounds.

Language skills also enhance career prospects in Earth Science, especially for work involving international collaboration. Affordable programs like the cheapest online spanish degree combine affordability with practical outcomes, making them an excellent choice for students balancing cost and career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Emmanuelle Geslin

Recently Published Articles