World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David A. Loegering

David A. Loegering

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
12207
World Ranking
16033
National Ranking
6655

David A. Loegering publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Loegering sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 101 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David A. Loegering D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Loegering sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Loegering is a researcher affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. The available data does not provide details on specific research papers, co-authors, or publication venues associated with this scientist.

There is no recorded information about the main fields or subfields of study in which David A. Loegering has published. Similarly, no details are available regarding the specific research topics or areas of work they focus on.

No book publications or awards have been documented for this scientist based on the current data. The profile does not indicate any details concerning academic honors or recognition received over the course of their career.

David A. Loegering's contributions to scientific literature, including their recent papers and co-authorships, are not listed, which limits a detailed overview of their research impact or collaborative patterns.

Despite the scarcity of publicly available data on their scholarly output, the affiliation with Mayo Clinic suggests involvement in biomedical or clinical research settings. However, any specific information about research interests or thematic concentrations remains unspecified.

Best Publications

  • Cytotoxic Properties of the Eosinophil Major Basic Protein

    Gerald J. Gleich;Evangelo Frigas;David A. Loegering;Donald L. Wassom

  • Cytotoxic effects of the guinea pig eosinophil major basic protein on tracheal epithelium.

    E. Frigas;D. A. Loegering;Gerald J. Gleich

  • Toxicity of eosinophil cationic proteins for guinea pig tracheal epithelium in vitro.

    Shinji Motojima;Evangelo Frigas;David A. Loegering;Gerald J. Gleich

  • Damage to Schistosomula of Schistosoma Mansoni Induced Directly by Eosinophil Major Basic Protein

    Anthony E. Butterworth;Donald L. Wassom;Gerald J. Gleich;David A. Loegering

  • An Investigation of the Cause of the Eosinophilia–Myalgia Syndrome Associated with Tryptophan Use

    Edward A. Belongia;Craig W. Hedberg;Gerald J. Gleich;Karen E. White

  • Elevated levels of the eosinophil granule major basic protein in the sputum of patients with bronchial asthma

    E. Frigas;D. A. Loegering;G. O. Solley;G. M. Farrow

  • Biochemical and functional similarities between human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil cationic protein: Homology with ribonuclease

    Gerald J. Gleich;David A. Loegering;Michael P. Bell;James L. Checkel

  • Ribonuclease activity associated with human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil cationic protein.

    N R Slifman;D A Loegering;D J McKean;G J Gleich

  • Comparative properties of the Charcot-Leyden crystal protein and the major basic protein from human eosinophils.

    G J Gleich;D A Loegering;K G Mann;J E Maldonado

  • Elevated serum levels of the eosinophil granule major basic protein in patients with eosinophilia.

    D L Wassom;D A Loegering;G O Solley;S B Moore

  • In vitro and in vivo antitumor effects of the dual insulin-like growth factor-I/insulin receptor inhibitor, BMS-554417.

    Paul Haluska;Joan M. Carboni;David A. Loegering;Francis Y. Lee

  • Identification of a major basic protein in guinea pig eosinophil granules.

    Gerald J. Gleich;David A. Loegering;Jorge E. Maldonado

  • Distinctive cationic proteins of the human eosinophil granule: major basic protein, eosinophil cationic protein, and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin.

    Steven J. Ackerman;D. A. Loegering;P. Venge;I. Olsson

  • Immunobiology of Eosinophils

    Gerald J. Gleich;David A. Loegering

  • Eosinophil granule proteins in peripheral blood granulocytes.

    R I Abu-Ghazaleh;S L Dunnette;D A Loegering;J L Checkel

  • Characterization of peak E, a novel amino acid associated with eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome

    Arthur N. Mayeno;Feng Lin;Christopher S. Foote;David A. Loegering

  • In vitro killing of microfilariae of Brugia pahangi and Brugia malayi by eosinophil granule proteins.

    Kimm J. Hamann;Gerald J. Gleich;James L. Checkel;David A. Loegering

  • Phosphatidylserine exposure during apoptosis reflects bidirectional trafficking between plasma membrane and cytoplasm

    Lee Sh;Meng Xw;Flatten Ks;Loegering Da

  • Comparative toxicity of purified human eosinophil granule cationic proteins for schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni.

    Steven J. Ackerman;Gerald J. Gleich;David A. Loegering;Brian A. Richardson

  • Proteomic analysis of mantle-cell lymphoma by protein microarray.

    Irene M. Ghobrial;Daniel J. McCormick;Scott H. Kaufmann;Alexey A. Leontovich

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald J. Gleich
Gerald J. Gleich University of Utah
Alex A. Adjei
Alex A. Adjei Cleveland Clinic
Larry M. Karnitz
Larry M. Karnitz Mayo Clinic
B. Douglas Smith
B. Douglas Smith Johns Hopkins University
Judith E. Karp
Judith E. Karp Johns Hopkins University
Larry R. Pease
Larry R. Pease Mayo Clinic
Steven J. Ackerman
Steven J. Ackerman University of Illinois at Chicago
Ruben A. Mesa
Ruben A. Mesa The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a range of dynamic healthcare careers. With technological advancements, many top programs now offer online pathways for both undergraduate and graduate credentials.

For students interested in nutrition, earning an online nutritionist degree is a flexible way to enter a growing field focused on wellness, disease prevention, and food science.

If you're driven by leadership in healthcare, consider the number of cahme accredited mha programs available. These programs prepare graduates for high-level administrative roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

For advanced clinical or academic tracks, doctoral options are widely accessible online. Prospective nurse leaders can benefit from a dnp program no clinical requirement, providing flexibility for working professionals.

Those interested in healthcare research or policy may pursue a phd in healthcare management online, equipping them for influential roles in academia, consulting, or industry.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Loegering

Recently Published Articles