World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel C. Fortier

Daniel C. Fortier

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4200
World Ranking
8002
National Ranking
414

Daniel C. Fortier publications per year

1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publications 2005: 1 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications
1974 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

Daniel C. Fortier publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Fortier sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 163 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Daniel C. Fortier D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Fortier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Deep Yedoma permafrost: A synthesis of depositional characteristics and carbon vulnerability

    Jens Strauss;Lutz Schirrmeister;Guido Grosse;Guido Grosse;Daniel Fortier

  • Observation of Rapid Drainage System Development by Thermal Erosion of Ice Wedges on Bylot Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago

    Unknown

  • Cryostratigraphy of late Pleistocene syngenetic permafrost (yedoma) in northern Alaska, Itkillik River exposure

    Unknown

  • Ground ice in the upper permafrost of the Beaufort Sea coast of Alaska

    M. Kanevskiy;Y. Shur;M.T. Jorgenson;C.-L. Ping

  • Crocodylian diversity peak and extinction in the late Cenozoic of the northern Neotropics

    T. M. Scheyer;O. A. Aguilera;M. Delfino;M. Delfino;D. C. Fortier

  • Circum-Arctic Map of the Yedoma Permafrost Domain

    Jens Strauss;Sebastian Laboor;Lutz Schirrmeister;Alexander N. Fedorov

  • Late Holocene syngenetic ice-wedge polygons development, Bylot Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago

    Daniel Fortier;Michel Allard

  • New stem-sauropodomorph (Dinosauria, Saurischia) from the Triassic of Brazil

    Sergio F. Cabreira;Cesar L. Schultz;Jonathas S. Bittencourt;Marina B. Soares

  • Degradation of permafrost beneath a road embankment enhanced by heat advected in groundwater<sup>1</sup>This article is one of a series of papers published in this CJES Special Issue on the theme of <i>Fundamental and applied research on permafrost in Canada</i>.

    Unknown

  • Cryostratigraphy and Permafrost Evolution in the Lacustrine Lowlands of West‐Central Alaska

    Mikhail Kanevskiy;Torre Jorgenson;Yuri Shur;Jonathan A. O'Donnell

  • Frost-cracking conditions, Bylot Island, eastern Canadian Arctic archipelago

    Unknown

  • Effects of thermo-erosion gullying on hydrologic flow networks, discharge and soil loss

    Unknown

  • PeRL: a circum-Arctic Permafrost Region Pond and Lake database

    Sina Muster;Kurt Roth;Moritz Langer;Stephan Lange

  • Paleoecology and radiocarbon dating of the Pleistocene megafauna of the Brazilian Intertropical Region

    Unknown

  • Patterns and rates of riverbank erosion involving ice-rich permafrost (yedoma) in northern Alaska

    Mikhail Kanevskiy;Yuri Shur;Jens Strauss;Torre Jorgenson

  • Geomorphology of a thermo-erosion gully, Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada<sup>1</sup>This article is one of a series of papers published in this CJES Special Issue on the theme of <i>Fundamental and applied research on permafrost in Canada</i>.<sup>2</sup>Polar Continental Shelf Project Contribution 043-11.

    Unknown

  • Surface energy balance of sub-Arctic roads with varying snow regimes and properties in permafrost regions

    Lin Chen;Lin Chen;Clifford I. Voss;Daniel Fortier;Daniel Fortier;Jeffrey M. McKenzie

  • Modern to millennium-old greenhouse gases emitted from ponds and lakes of the Eastern Canadian Arctic (Bylot Island, Nunavut)

    F. Bouchard;F. Bouchard;F. Bouchard;I. Laurion;I. Laurion;V. Prėskienis;V. Prėskienis;D. Fortier;D. Fortier

  • Impact of Heat Advection on the Thermal Regime of Roads Built on Permafrost

    Lin Chen;Lin Chen;Daniel Fortier;Daniel Fortier;Jeffrey M. McKenzie;Michel Sliger

  • Biogeochemical and geocryological characteristics of wedge and thermokarst-cave ice in the CRREL permafrost tunnel, Alaska†

    Thomas A. Douglas;Daniel Fortier;Yuri L. Shur;Mikhail Z. Kanevskiy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, often complemented by related degrees in management, information science, and more. For professionals aiming to enhance leadership skills within environmental organizations, pursuing an online masters degree in human resource management can be particularly valuable. This skillset helps streamline team dynamics and project implementation in scientific settings.

For those seeking flexible or accelerated study options, especially seniors considering a career shift or continued education, there are practical choices like one year degrees for seniors. These programs provide targeted learning outcomes without the time commitment of traditional multi-year degrees, making them ideal for lifelong learners.

Information and data management are integral to Earth Science research. Complementing your studies with an accredited program can enhance expertise in this area. Options such as ala accredited mlis programs support careers in managing scientific data and resources effectively.

Additionally, a masters in library science can pave the way for specialized roles in archiving and curating scientific knowledge, ensuring that valuable Earth Science findings are preserved and accessible for future research and policy making.

Recently Published Articles