World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 38 2294 2138 2 2 91 5216

CS Lopes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by CS Lopes between 2002 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. CS Lopes published across 22 years, from 2002 to 2023, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2018. 5 of the 96 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2018. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications
2002 2023

96 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
CS Lopes: publications per year, 2002 to 2023
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 3
2008 4
2009 6
2010 3
2011 4
2012 3
2013 6
2014 4
2015 5
2016 8
2017 9
2018 12
2019 7
2020 8
2021 4
2022 3
2023 2
Total 96
Download as CSV

CS Lopes publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where CS Lopes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 91 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67 91
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

CS Lopes D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where CS Lopes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130 38
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part II: Numerical simulations

    C.S. Lopes;C.S. Lopes;P.P. Camanho;Z. Gürdal;P. Maimí

  • Variable-stiffness composite panels: Buckling and first-ply failure improvements over straight-fibre laminates

    C. S. Lopes;Z. Gürdal;P. P. Camanho

  • LOW-VELOCITY IMPACT DAMAGE ON DISPERSED STACKING SEQUENCE LAMINATES. PART I: EXPERIMENTS

    C.S. Lopes;C.S. Lopes;O. Seresta;Y. Coquet;Z. Gürdal

  • Computational micromechanics of the transverse and shear behavior of unidirectional fiber reinforced polymers including environmental effects

    F. Naya;C. González;C. González;C.S. Lopes;S. Van der Veen

  • Effects of ply clustering in laminated composite plates under low-velocity impact loading

    E.V. González;P. Maimí;P.P. Camanho;C.S. Lopes

  • Progressive failure analysis of tow-placed, variable-stiffness composite panels

    C.S. Lopes;C.S. Lopes;P.P. Camanho;Z. Gürdal;B.F. Tatting

  • Transverse cracking of cross-ply laminates: A computational micromechanics perspective

    Miguel Herráez;Diego Mora;Fernando Naya;Claudio S. Lopes

  • A Theoretical Model to Study the Influence of Tow-drop Areas on the Stiffness and Strength of Variable-stiffness Laminates

    Adriana W. Blom;Claudio S. Lopes;Peter J. Kromwijk;Zafer Gurdal

  • Tailoring for strength of composite steered-fibre panels with cutouts

    C.S. Lopes;Z. Gürdal;P.P. Camanho

  • Ply and interlaminar behaviours of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic laminates; effects of processing conditions and microstructure

    Unknown

  • Computational micromechanics of fiber kinking in unidirectional FRP under different environmental conditions

    F. Naya;M. Herráez;C.S. Lopes;C. González;C. González

  • Physically-sound simulation of low-velocity impact on fiber reinforced laminates

    C.S. Lopes;C.S. Lopes;S. Sádaba;C. González;C. González;J. Llorca;J. Llorca

  • Modelling and simulation methodology for unidirectional composite laminates in a Virtual Test Lab framework

    Unknown

  • Characterization of crack propagation in mode I delamination of multidirectional CFRP laminates

    T.A. Sebaey;N. Blanco;J. Costa;C.S. Lopes

  • Damage resistance and damage tolerance of dispersed CFRP laminates: Effect of the mismatch angle between plies

    T.A. Sebaey;E.V. González;C.S. Lopes;N. Blanco

  • An approach to analyse the factors behind the micromechanical response of 3D-printed composites

    Unknown

  • Computational micromechanics evaluation of the effect of fibre shape on the transverse strength of unidirectional composites: An approach to virtual materials design

    M. Herráez;C. González;C.S. Lopes;R. Guzmán de Villoria

  • Experimental analysis and simulation of low-velocity impact damage of composite laminates

    Unknown

  • Post-processing effects on microstructure, interlaminar and thermal properties of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre composites

    Unknown

  • Damage resistance and damage tolerance of dispersed CFRP laminates: Effect of ply clustering

    T.A. Sebaey;T.A. Sebaey;E.V. González;C.S. Lopes;N. Blanco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, considering related online degrees can open diverse career avenues. Programs like counseling provide vital skills in communication and problem-solving, making the easy to get counseling degree an attractive option for those seeking flexibility alongside engineering studies.

In the realm of behavior and human interaction, accelerated programs offer efficient pathways to certification. For instance, individuals interested in behavior analysis can benefit from an accelerated BCBA program, which fast-tracks their expertise and career progression.

Understanding program requirements is essential when considering advanced degrees linked to healthcare and communication sciences. Prospective students aiming for Speech-Language Pathology should research acceptance trends through resources like SLP grad school acceptance rate to enhance their admission prospects.

Similarly, those interested in audiology may find pursuing one of the easiest audiology programs to get into a strategic choice for entering the field quickly while gaining relevant technical knowledge that complements engineering skills.

Exploring these related degree options online provides flexibility and broadens career pathways, allowing students and professionals alike to tailor their education to evolving interests and industry demands.

Recently Published Articles