World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4518
World Ranking
13589
National Ranking
5426

Brian Amento publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Amento sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 79 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Brian Amento D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Amento sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Amento is affiliated with AT&T in the United States. The professional focuses on research activities within this corporate environment but specific details regarding research areas, publications, or collaborations are not available from the provided data.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues have been recorded, limiting insights into their academic contributions or research network.

Information on fields of study, subfields, or main research topics is not present, preventing further elaboration on specific scientific interests or expertise.

There is no record of book publications or awards associated with Brian Amento, indicating either non-involvement or a lack of publicly documented achievements in these categories.

The scientist is currently active, with no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • PHOAKS: a system for sharing recommendations

    Loren Terveen;Will Hill;Brian Amento;David McDonald

  • Does “authority” mean quality? predicting expert quality ratings of Web documents

    Brian Amento;Loren Terveen;Will Hill

  • System and method to create a media content summary based on viewer annotations

    Brian Amento;Mukesh Nathan;Larry Stead

  • Rethinking the progress bar

    Chris Harrison;Brian Amento;Stacey Kuznetsov;Robert Bell

  • Constructing, organizing, and visualizing collections of topically related Web resources

    Loren Terveen;Will Hill;Brian Amento

  • CollaboraTV: making television viewing social again

    Mukesh Nathan;Chris Harrison;Svetlana Yarosh;Loren Terveen

  • SCANMail: a voicemail interface that makes speech browsable, readable and searchable

    Steve Whittaker;Julia Hirschberg;Brian Amento;Litza Stark

  • Bioacoustic control system, method and apparatus

    Brian Amento;William Colyer Hill;Loren Gilbert Terveen

  • Devices and methods for transferring data through a human body

    Brian Amento;Kevin Ansia Li;Kermit Hal Purdy;Larry Stead

  • Error Correction In Automatic Speech Recognition Transcripts

    Brian Amento;Philip Locke Isenhour;Larry Stead

  • The sound of one hand: a wrist-mounted bio-acoustic fingertip gesture interface

    Brian Amento;Will Hill;Loren Terveen

  • Mining viewer responses to multimedia content

    Brian Scott Amento;Alicia Abella;Larry Stead

  • Interest Profiles for Audio and/or Video Streams

    Brian Amento;Christopher Harrison;Larry Stead

  • Avatars in social interactive television

    Brian Scott Amento;Christopher Harrison;Larry Stead

  • Experiments in social data mining: The TopicShop system

    Brian Amento;Loren Terveen;Will Hill;Deborah Hix

  • Gesture-based controls via bone conduction

    Christopher Baldwin;Brian S. Amento

  • Device feedback and input via heating and cooling

    Kevin Ansia Li;Brian Amento

  • Method for sensing user presence for buddy list applications

    Alicia Abella;Brian Amento;Lawrence Stead;Benjamin J. Stern

  • Building task-specific interfaces to high volume conversational data

    Loren G. Terveen;William C. Hill;Brian Amento;David McDonald

  • An empirical evaluation of user interfaces for topic management of Web sites

    Brian Amento;Will Hill;Loren Terveen;Deborah Hix

Frequent Co-Authors

Loren Terveen
Loren Terveen University of Minnesota
Chris Harrison
Chris Harrison Carnegie Mellon University
David W. McDonald
David W. McDonald University of Washington
Jay G. Wilpon
Jay G. Wilpon Ai Wilpon Consulting LLC
Steve Whittaker
Steve Whittaker University of California, Santa Cruz
Ramón Cáceres
Ramón Cáceres Google (United States)
Gokhan Tur
Gokhan Tur Amazon (United States)
Dilek Hakkani-Tur
Dilek Hakkani-Tur University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Julia Hirschberg
Julia Hirschberg Columbia University
Tommaso Melodia
Tommaso Melodia Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in computer science but want to explore other fields or flexible study options, there are many related online degree pathways to consider. Many universities now offer online programs that allow you to earn a degree on your own schedule, whether you’re a working professional or just need more flexibility.

For those seeking to complete their education quickly, the fastest computer science degree programs can help you graduate in less time, launching your tech career sooner. Alternatively, you might consider interdisciplinary areas that integrate technology and sustainability, such as an environmental engineering degree online, which prepares graduates for in-demand roles focused on environmental solutions.

Engineering is another complementary path to computer science. If you are interested in applying computational skills to physical systems, check out the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree programs to broaden your technical expertise affordably. For those with a passion for scientific discovery, pursuing the best online physics degree can open doors to careers in research, data analysis, and innovative industries.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Amento

Trending Scientists