World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Beat H. Gähwiler

Beat H. Gähwiler

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
80
Citations
20853
World Ranking
1628
National Ranking
31

Beat H. Gähwiler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat H. Gähwiler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Beat H. Gähwiler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat H. Gähwiler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beat H. Gähwiler is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their academic career is tied to this institution, where they contribute to research activities and scientific advancement.

No recent papers, specific publications, or frequent co-authors are listed, so details on individual research articles or collaborations are not available.

Similarly, information about main fields of study, subfields, and topics of research has not been provided, thus limiting the ability to define particular research domains or thematic focuses associated with their work.

There is no data concerning publication venues or book publications, which restricts insight into the outlets or publishers that have disseminated their research or academic contributions.

No awards or honors have been recorded, and the scientist is currently alive.

Best Publications

  • Organotypic slice cultures: a technique has come of age

    B.H Gähwiler;M Capogna;D Debanne;R.A McKinney

  • Organotypic monolayer cultures of nervous tissue

    B.H. Gähwiler

  • Long-term synaptic plasticity between pairs of individual CA3 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slice cultures

    Dominique Debanne;Beat H. Gähwiler;Scott M. Thompson

  • Paired-pulse facilitation and depression at unitary synapses in rat hippocampus: quantal fluctuation affects subsequent release.

    Dominique Debanne;Nathalie C. Guérineau;Beat H. Gähwiler;Scott M. Thompson

  • Miniature synaptic events maintain dendritic spines via AMPA receptor activation.

    R A McKinney;M Capogna;R Dürr;B H Gähwiler

  • GABAB-receptor-activated K+ current in voltage-clamped CA3 pyramidal cells in hippocampal cultures

    B H Gähwiler;D A Brown

  • Potassium conductances in hippocampal neurons blocked by excitatory amino-acid transmitters

    Serge Charpak;Beat H. Gähwiler;Kirn Q. Do;Thomas Knöpfel

  • Comparison of the actions of adenosine at pre‐ and postsynaptic receptors in the rat hippocampus in vitro.

    S M Thompson;H L Haas;B H Gähwiler

  • Presynaptic inhibition of miniature excitatory synaptic currents by baclofen and adenosine in the hippocampus

    Massimo Scanziani;Marco Capogna;Beat H. Gähwiler;Scott M. Thompson

  • Activity-dependent disinhibition. I. Repetitive stimulation reduces IPSP driving force and conductance in the hippocampus in vitro

    S. M. Thompson;B. H. Gahwiler

  • Inhibition of uptake unmasks rapid extracellular turnover of glutamate of nonvesicular origin

    D. Jabaudon;K. Shimamoto;Y. Yasuda-Kamatani;M. Scanziani

  • Activity-dependent disinhibition. II. Effects of extracellular potassium, furosemide, and membrane potential on ECl- in hippocampal CA3 neurons

    S. M. Thompson;B. H. Gahwiler

  • Acute decrease in net glutamate uptake during energy deprivation

    Denis Jabaudon;Massimo Scanziani;Beat H. Gähwiler;Urs Gerber

  • Action-potential propagation gated by an axonal I A -like K + conductance in hippocampus

    Dominique Debanne;Dominique Debanne;Nathalie C. Guérineau;Nathalie C. Guérineau;Beat H. Gähwiler;Scott M. Thompson

  • Organotypic cultures of neural tissue

    B.H. Gähwiler

  • Cellular and connective organization of slice cultures of the rat hippocampus and fascia dentata

    J. Zimmer;B. H. Gähwiler

  • Presynaptic enhancement of inhibitory synaptic transmission by protein kinases A and C in the rat hippocampus in vitro

    M Capogna;BH Gahwiler;SM Thompson

  • Asynchronous pre- and postsynaptic activity induces associative long-term depression in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus in vitro.

    Dominique Debanne;Beat H. Gahwiler;Scott M. Thompson

  • Effects of the GABA uptake inhibitor tiagabine on inhibitory synaptic potentials in rat hippocampal slice cultures.

    S. M. Thompson;B. H. Gahwiler

  • A frequency-dependent switch from inhibition to excitation in a hippocampal unitary circuit

    Masahiro Mori;Mathias H. Abegg;Beat H. Gähwiler;Urs Gerber

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott M. Thompson
Scott M. Thompson University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Thomas Knöpfel
Thomas Knöpfel Hong Kong Baptist University
Marco Capogna
Marco Capogna Aarhus University
Massimo Scanziani
Massimo Scanziani University of California, San Francisco
Peter Streit
Peter Streit University of Zurich
Andreas Lüthi
Andreas Lüthi Friedrich Miescher Institute
Anita Lüthi
Anita Lüthi University of Lausanne
Zoltán Molnár
Zoltán Molnár University of Oxford
Pico Caroni
Pico Caroni Friedrich Miescher Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Beat H. Gähwiler

Recently Published Articles