World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 45 1524 1411 184 184 162 8187

Baoping Tang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Baoping Tang between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Baoping Tang published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2024. 56 of the 232 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2024. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 25 publications
2002 2025

232 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Baoping Tang: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 2
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 6
2011 4
2012 3
2013 6
2014 10
2015 11
2016 9
2017 9
2018 6
2019 16
2020 15
2021 21
2022 22
2023 23
2024 31
2025 25
Total 232
Download as CSV

Baoping Tang publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baoping Tang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 162 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132 162
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Baoping Tang D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baoping Tang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79 45
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Deep Residual Shrinkage Networks for Fault Diagnosis

    Minghang Zhao;Shisheng Zhong;Xuyun Fu;Baoping Tang

  • Deep Residual Networks With Dynamically Weighted Wavelet Coefficients for Fault Diagnosis of Planetary Gearboxes

    Minghang Zhao;Myeongsu Kang;Baoping Tang;Michael Pecht

  • The structure healthy condition monitoring and fault diagnosis methods in wind turbines: A review

    Unknown

  • Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on Morlet wavelet transformation and Wigner-Ville distribution

    Unknown

  • Condition monitoring of wind turbines based on spatio-temporal fusion of SCADA data by convolutional neural networks and gated recurrent units

    Unknown

  • A hybrid attention improved ResNet based fault diagnosis method of wind turbines gearbox

    Unknown

  • Fault diagnosis for a wind turbine transmission system based on manifold learning and Shannon wavelet support vector machine

    Unknown

  • Deep Residual Networks With Adaptively Parametric Rectifier Linear Units for Fault Diagnosis

    Minghang Zhao;Shisheng Zhong;Xuyun Fu;Baoping Tang

  • Fault Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Gearbox Using a Novel Method of Fast Deep Graph Convolutional Networks

    Unknown

  • Multiple Wavelet Coefficients Fusion in Deep Residual Networks for Fault Diagnosis

    Minghang Zhao;Myeongsu Kang;Baoping Tang;Michael Pecht

  • Feature extraction method of wind turbine based on adaptive Morlet wavelet and SVD

    Unknown

  • Multi-level wavelet packet fusion in dynamic ensemble convolutional neural network for fault diagnosis

    Unknown

  • Multi-fault diagnosis for rotating machinery based on orthogonal supervised linear local tangent space alignment and least square support vector machine

    Unknown

  • A fault diagnosis method for wind turbines gearbox based on adaptive loss weighted meta-ResNet under noisy labels

    Unknown

  • Transient Feature Extraction by the Improved Orthogonal Matching Pursuit and K-SVD Algorithm With Adaptive Transient Dictionary

    Unknown

  • Status and problems of wind turbine structural health monitoring techniques in China

    Unknown

  • An enhanced convolutional neural network with enlarged receptive fields for fault diagnosis of planetary gearboxes

    Unknown

  • Bearing remaining useful life estimation based on time–frequency representation and supervised dimensionality reduction

    Unknown

  • Deep convolution domain-adversarial transfer learning for fault diagnosis of rolling bearings

    Unknown

  • Order spectrogram visualization for rolling bearing fault detection under speed variation conditions

    Yi Wang;Yi Wang;Peter W. Tse;Baoping Tang;Yi Qin

Frequent Co-Authors

David He
David He University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often leads students to consider diverse online degrees and career pathways. While engineering fields focus heavily on technical skills, many students also look into disciplines that balance science with practical applications in health and behavior. For example, those interested in human factors or ergonomics might explore psychology or behavioral sciences, where pursuing the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis can offer a flexible, accelerated route to advanced qualifications.

For students intrigued by communication sciences, particularly speech disorders, understanding the challenges of getting into graduate programs is important. Insights on the slp grad school acceptance rate can help applicants navigate admissions effectively and set realistic goals.

Additionally, those who want to balance career advancement with accessibility might consider programs recognized as the easiest slp programs to get into. These programs can provide streamlined paths for entering the field of speech-language pathology, often a complementary discipline for engineers working in healthcare technology or rehabilitation engineering.

Cost is another vital factor; understanding online speech pathology degree tuition and fees helps students plan financially and compare programs before committing to their educational journey. By considering these related degrees and career options, students can expand their skill set and increase their versatility in today's competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Baoping Tang