World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
7300
World Ranking
6735
National Ranking
350

Antonella Peppe publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonella Peppe sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 124 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Antonella Peppe D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonella Peppe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonella Peppe is a researcher affiliated with the University of Rome Tor Vergata in Italy. Their work predominantly lies within the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a specific focus on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Psychiatry and Mental Health. Their research addresses topics related to Parkinson's Disease mechanisms and treatments, neurological disorders and treatments, as well as EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Peppe's research interests also extend to neural and behavioral psychology studies, balance, gait, and falls prevention, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, and dysphagia assessment and management. These topics reflect a broad engagement with both the pathophysiology and therapeutic approaches for neurological conditions.

Their recent publications include:

  • Beyond the Microbiota: Understanding the Role of the Enteric Nervous System in Parkinson's Disease from Mice to Human, 2023, Biomedicines
  • Auditory Cue Based on the Golden Ratio Can Improve Gait Patterns in People with Parkinson's Disease, 2021, Sensors
  • Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown on Movement Disorders Patients With Deep Brain Stimulation: A Multicenter Survey, 2020, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Relationship between Muscular Activity and Postural Control Changes after Proprioceptive Focal Stimulation (Equistasi®) in Middle-Moderate Parkinson's Disease Patients: An Explorative Study, 2021, Sensors
  • Combined EEG and immersive virtual reality unveil dopaminergic modulation of error monitoring in Parkinson's Disease, 2023, npj Parkinson s Disease

Peppe's work has been published in several recurring venues, including:

  • Preprints.org
  • Sensors
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • npj Parkinson s Disease
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Collaboration forms a significant part of Peppe's research environment. Frequent coauthors include Silvia Zabberoni, Alberto Costa, Carla Piano, Francesco Bove, and Sara Taglieri, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine and subthalamic nuclei in severe Parkinson's disease

    Alessandro Stefani;Andres M. Lozano;Antonella Peppe;Paolo Stanzione

  • Implantation of human pedunculopontine nucleus: A safe and clinically relevant target in Parkinson's disease

    Paolo Mazzone;Andres Lozano;Paolo Stanzione;Salvatore Galati

  • Magnetic resonance imaging markers of Parkinson’s disease nigrostriatal signature

    Patrice Péran;Andrea Cherubini;Francesca Assogna;Fabrizio Piras

  • rTMS of supplementary motor area modulates therapy-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson disease

    G. Koch;L. Brusa;C. Caltagirone;A. Peppe

  • Dopaminergic modulation of visual-spatial working memory in Parkinson's disease.

    Alberto Costa;Antonella Peppe;Grazia Dell’Agnello;Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo

  • Functional changes in the activity of cerebellum and frontostriatal regions during externally and internally timed movement in Parkinson's disease

    Antonio Cerasa;Gisela E. Hagberg;Antonella Peppe;Marta Bianciardi

  • Object naming and action-verb generation in Parkinson's disease: a fMRI study.

    Patrice Péran;Dominique Cardebat;Andrea Cherubini;Fabrizio Piras

  • Impaired reproduction of second but not millisecond time intervals in Parkinson's disease.

    Giacomo Koch;Alberto Costa;Livia Brusa;Antonella Peppe

  • Biochemical and electrophysiological changes of substantia nigra pars reticulata driven by subthalamic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease

    Salvatore Galati;Paolo Mazzone;Ernesto Fedele;Antonio Pisani

  • Subthalamic stimulation activates internal pallidus: evidence from cGMP microdialysis in PD patients.

    Alessandro Stefani;Ernesto Fedele;Salvatore Galati;Olimpia Pepicelli

  • Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus compared with the globus pallidus internus in patients with Parkinson disease.

    Antonella Peppe;Mariangela Pierantozzi;Andrea Bassi;Maria Grazia Altibrandi

  • Effects of Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation on Urodynamic Findings in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease

    Enrico Finazzi-Agrò;Antonella Peppe;Andrea D’Amico;Filomena Petta

  • Non-motor functions in parkinsonian patients implanted in the pedunculopontine nucleus: focus on sleep and cognitive domains.

    Stefani Alessandro;Roberto Ceravolo;Livia Brusa;Mariangela Pierantozzi

  • Pramipexole in comparison to l-dopa: a neuropsychological study.

    L. Brusa;A. Bassi;A. Stefani;M. Pierantozzi

  • The golden ratio of gait harmony: repetitive proportions of repetitive gait phases.

    Marco Iosa;Augusto Fusco;Fabio Marchetti;Giovanni Morone

  • Dopamine and cognitive functioning in de novo subjects with Parkinson's disease : Effects of pramipexole and pergolide on working memory

    Alberto Costa;Antonella Peppe;Grazia Dell’Agnello;Carlo Caltagirone

  • Does gait analysis quantify motor rehabilitation efficacy in Parkinson's disease patients?

    A. Peppe;C. Chiavalon;P. Pasqualetti;D. Crovato

  • Visual alterations in de novo Parkinson's disease Pattern electroretinogram latencies are more delayed and more reversible by levodopa than are visual evoked potentials

    A. Peppe;P. Stanzione;F. Pierelli;D. De Angelis

  • Deep brain stimulation of both subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus restores intracortical inhibition in Parkinson's disease paralleling apomorphine effects: A paired magnetic stimulation study

    M Pierantozzi;M.G Palmieri;P Mazzone;M.G Marciani

  • The effect of deep brain stimulation on the frontal N30 component of somatosensory evoked potentials in advanced Parkinson's disease patients

    M Pierantozzi;P Mazzone;A Bassi;P.M Rossini

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Stanzione
Paolo Stanzione University of Rome Tor Vergata
Alessandro Stefani
Alessandro Stefani University of Rome Tor Vergata
Carlo Caltagirone
Carlo Caltagirone Fondazione Santa Lucia
Mariangela Pierantozzi
Mariangela Pierantozzi University of Rome Tor Vergata
Livia Brusa
Livia Brusa University of Rome Tor Vergata
Paolo Mazzone
Paolo Mazzone University of Rome Tor Vergata
Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo
Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo University of Rome Tor Vergata
Giorgio Bernardi
Giorgio Bernardi University of Rome Tor Vergata
Giacomo Koch
Giacomo Koch University of Ferrara
Patrizio Pasqualetti
Patrizio Pasqualetti Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Antonella Peppe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles