World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
5850
World Ranking
8981
National Ranking
3799

Alev Erisir publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alev Erisir sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alev Erisir D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alev Erisir sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alev Erisir is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States, focusing on research in neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans a variety of subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, ophthalmology, and biophysics.

The scientist's publications explore multiple facets of neural dynamics, retinal development, and advanced imaging techniques. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Mapping thalamic innervation to individual L2/3 pyramidal neurons and modeling their 'readout' of visual input" (2023, Nature Neuroscience)
  • "Visible-Light Optical Coherence Tomography Fibergraphy of the Tree Shrew Retinal Ganglion Cell Axon Bundles" (2024, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging)
  • "Father's care uniquely influences male neurodevelopment" (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "3D electron microscopy and volume-based bouton sorting reveal the selectivity of inputs onto geniculate relay cell and interneuron dendrite segments" (2023, Frontiers in Neuroanatomy)
  • "Comparative In Vivo Imaging of Retinal Structures in Tree Shrews, Humans, and Mice" (2024, eNeuro)

Erisir's research topics cover diverse areas including neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neural dynamics and brain function, retinal development and disorders, glaucoma and retinal disorders, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques, and optical coherence tomography applications.

They have frequently published in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eNeuro
  • Nature Neuroscience
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • Molecular Neurobiology

The scientist has worked collaboratively with multiple co-authors, notably:

  • Jianhua Cang
  • Élise Savier
  • David A. Miller
  • Marta Grannonico
  • Mingna Liu

Alev Erisir's research integrates methods from molecular biology and neuroscience to better understand brain function and retinal structures. They contribute to advancing knowledge in cellular mechanisms underlying neural input processing, as well as to developing and applying high-resolution imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography, relevant to both basic and translational research in neuroscience and ophthalmology.

Best Publications

  • Function of Specific K+ Channels in Sustained High-Frequency Firing of Fast-Spiking Neocortical Interneurons

    A. Erisir;D. Lau;B. Rudy;C. S. Leonard

  • Contributions of Kv3 channels to neuronal excitability.

    Bernardo Rudy;Alan Chow;David Lau;Yimy Amarillo

  • K+ Channels at the Axon Initial Segment Dampen Near-Threshold Excitability of Neocortical Fast-Spiking GABAergic Interneurons

    Ethan M. Goldberg;Brian D. Clark;Edward Zagha;Mark Nahmani

  • Relative distribution of synapses in the A-laminae of the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat.

    Susan C. Van Horn;Alev Erişir;S. Murray Sherman

  • K+ Channel Expression Distinguishes Subpopulations of Parvalbumin- and Somatostatin-Containing Neocortical Interneurons

    A. Chow;A. Erisir;C. Farb;M. S. Nadal

  • Tau-dependent microtubule disassembly initiated by prefibrillar β-amyloid

    Michelle E. King;Ho-Man Kan;Peter W. Baas;Alev Erisir

  • Relative numbers of cortical and brainstem inputs to the lateral geniculate nucleus

    A. Erisir;S. C. Van Horn;S. M. Sherman

  • General Anesthesia Causes Long-Lasting Disturbances in the Ultrastructural Properties of Developing Synapses in Young Rats

    N. Lunardi;N. Lunardi;C. Ori;A. Erisir;V. Jevtovic-Todorovic;V. Jevtovic-Todorovic

  • The abolishment of anesthesia-induced cognitive impairment by timely protection of mitochondria in the developing rat brain: the importance of free oxygen radicals and mitochondrial integrity.

    A. Boscolo;J.A. Starr;V. Sanchez;N. Lunardi;N. Lunardi

  • Developmental Switch in the Contribution of Presynaptic and Postsynaptic NMDA Receptors to Long-Term Depression

    Rebekah Corlew;Yun Wang;Haben Ghermazien;Alev Erisir

  • Immunocytochemistry and distribution of parabrachial terminals in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: a comparison with corticogeniculate terminals.

    Alev Erişir;Susan C. Van Horn;Martha E. Bickford;S. Murray Sherman

  • Ultrastructural Localization Suggests that Retinal and Cortical Inputs Access Different Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

    Dwayne W. Godwin;Susan C. Van Horn;Alev Erişir;Michael Sesma

  • Early exposure to general anesthesia disturbs mitochondrial fission and fusion in the developing rat brain.

    Annalisa Boscolo;Desanka Milanovic;John A. Starr;Victoria Sanchez

  • Decline of the critical period of visual plasticity is concurrent with the reduction of NR2B subunit of the synaptic NMDA receptor in layer 4.

    Alev Erisir;Janna L. Harris

  • VGluT2 immunochemistry identifies thalamocortical terminals in layer 4 of adult and developing visual cortex.

    Marc Nahmani;Alev Erisir

  • Selective loss of dentate hilar interneurons contributes to reduced synaptic inhibition of granule cells in an electrical stimulation‐based animal model of temporal lobe epilepsy

    Chengsan Sun;Zakaria Mtchedlishvili;Edward H. Bertram;Alev Erisir

  • Neural-immune interface in the rat area postrema.

    L.E. Goehler;A. Erisir;R.P.A. Gaykema

  • Rapid Structural Remodeling of Thalamocortical Synapses Parallels Experience-Dependent Functional Plasticity in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

    Jason E. Coleman;Marc Nahmani;Jeffrey Gavornik;Robert Heinz Haslinger

  • Old Dogs Learning New Tricks: Neuroplasticity Beyond the Juvenile Period

    Angeline S. Lillard;Alev Erisir

  • Immunohistological demonstration of CaV3.2 T-type voltage-gated calcium channel expression in soma of dorsal root ganglion neurons and peripheral axons of rat and mouse.

    Kirstin E. Rose;Nadia Lunardi;Annalisa Boscolo;Xinzhong Dong

Frequent Co-Authors

Chiye Aoki
Chiye Aoki New York University
S. Murray Sherman
S. Murray Sherman University of Chicago
Bernardo Rudy
Bernardo Rudy New York University
Jaideep Kapur
Jaideep Kapur University of Virginia
Lisa E. Goehler
Lisa E. Goehler University of Virginia
Ronald P.A. Gaykema
Ronald P.A. Gaykema University of Virginia
Martha E. Bickford
Martha E. Bickford University of Louisville
Karl Deisseroth
Karl Deisseroth Stanford University
Ruth L. Stornetta
Ruth L. Stornetta University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related fields while studying Neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of career options. Many students consider earning an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited to save time and enter the workforce sooner, which is especially appealing for those who want flexibility or have other commitments.

When planning your educational journey, it’s also beneficial to look at the best bachelor degrees to get for your long-term financial security. Some neuroscience-adjacent majors rank among the most profitable degrees, opening opportunities in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, research, and technology.

Cost is another key concern for many. If affordability and financial aid are priorities, consider enrolling in an online school that accepts fafsa to maximize your financial assistance options.

By considering these degree pathways and resources, you can tailor your education to meet your career goals and financial circumstances while keeping your options broad within neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Alev Erisir

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles