Education is a substantial investment, so Research.com designed its counseling rankings to help readers compare affordability alongside evidence about program quality and outcomes. The team draws on institutional and federal data, checks which measures apply to each program, and distinguishes an affordability ranking from rankings that answer other questions.
Research.com evaluates counseling programs using graduate completion, employment or doctoral admission, applicable licensure-exam results, CACREP programmatic accreditation, federal Title IV eligibility, and cost. For its Best ranking, the graduate-outcomes-and-accreditation score weights completion at 40%, employment or doctoral admission at 20%, applicable licensure-exam pass rates at 20%, CACREP accreditation at 16%, and Title IV eligibility at 4%. Inapplicable criteria are excluded and the remaining weights renormalized; cost contributes approximately 7% of the final Best score. The same approach applies to online and campus programs. Other rankings order programs by the dimension named in the ranking, so an affordability position should not be mistaken for a licensure outcome or a personal return-on-investment estimate.
The following data sources inform the rankings. Consulting several sources helps readers compare programs without relying on a single institution's description:
Read the Research.com methodology for more about how rankings are created. Before enrolling, confirm current prices, accreditation, placement arrangements, and licensing eligibility directly with a school and the relevant Oklahoma authority; historical data cannot settle an individual student's costs or eligibility.