| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 523 | 35 | 43 | 15 |
The concepts of Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Toxicity, Pharmacology and Biochemistry are tackled in Toxicological Sciences. While Internal medicine is the focus of Toxicological Sciences, it also provided insights into the studies of Developmental toxicity and Carcinogen. Some problems in Endocrinology that were presented in Toxicological Sciences overlapped with concepts under Offspring, Pregnancy, Fetus and Gestation.
The journal facilitates discussions on Toxicity that incorporate concepts from other fields like Oral administration, Inhalation, Pathology, Teratology and Physiology. The study on Inhalation featured in the journal expounds on the topic of Inhalation exposure in particular. The study on Pathology presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Lung.
The study of Pharmacology encompasses disciplines such as In vivo, as well as fields such as In vitro, all of which overlap with one another. It connects the study in Biochemistry with the closely related area of Molecular biology. Toxicological Sciences focuses on Molecular biology but sometimes tackles the closely related topic of Apoptosis which is concerned with Cell biology.
The most cited publications investigate areas of study like Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Toxicity, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. The most cited papers hold forums on Endocrinology that merge themes from other disciplines such as Offspring and Teratology, Fetus. The published papers primarily dealt with subjects of interest in Toxicity but also expanded the discussion to include studies in
Toxicological Sciences is organized to address concerns in the fields of Pharmacology, Toxicity, Internal medicine, Endocrinology and Cell biology. In Toxicological Sciences, Oxidative stress, Genotoxicity and In vivo are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Pharmacology research. While the journal focused on Toxicity, it was also able to explore topics like Metabolite, Molecular biology, Transcriptome and Physiology.
Internal medicine research discussed connects with the study of Offspring. It focuses on Endocrinology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor and Feces. Cell biology research presented in it encompasses a variety of subjects, including Downregulation and upregulation, Gene expression, Neurodegeneration and Transcription factor.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Toxicological Sciences (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Toxicological Sciences (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.21% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 28.48% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 17.22% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.88% of all publications and 36.42% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Kylie D Rock;Genevieve St Armour;Brian Horman;Allison Phillips
(2020)Carrie A McDonough;Carrie A McDonough;Chastity Ward;Qing Hu;Samuel Vance
(2020)James C Waddington;Xiaoli Meng;Patricia T Illing;Arun Tailor
(2020)Joe Jongpyo Lim;Xueshu Li;Hans Joachim Lehmler;Dongfang Wang
(2020)Vivek Lawana;Vivek Lawana;Se Young Um;Jean Christophe Rochet;Robert J. Turesky
(2020)Tingting Yan;Nana Yan;Hong Wang;Tomoki Yagai;Tomoki Yagai
(2021)Benjamin A Elser;Khaled Kayali;Ram Dhakal;Bailey O'Hare
(2020)Katherine E Manz;Kyle Yamada;Lukas Scheidl;Michele A La Merrill
(2021)Ans Punt;James Firman;Alan Boobis;Mark Cronin
(2020)For those interested in healthcare beyond traditional medicine, exploring online degrees in health information management can open numerous career opportunities. Affordable online HIM programs provide flexible options to gain essential skills in medical data management, coding, and billing. These programs cater to a growing demand for trained professionals who ensure accuracy and compliance in healthcare documentation.
Medical billing and coding continue to show a positive job outlook due to the vital role they play in healthcare administration. Understanding the differences in certification, such as ccs certification versus other credentials, can impact salary prospects and career advancement. Choosing the right certification ensures you are well-equipped with recognized qualifications in this competitive field.
Additionally, exploring how much do medical coders make is crucial when planning your career path. The earning potential varies based on certification, experience, and location, making informed decisions important for long-term satisfaction. Medical billing and coding jobs offer a stable and rewarding alternative for those passionate about healthcare but seeking roles outside of clinical practice.
By leveraging the right online programs and certifications, you can build a successful career that complements or serves as an alternative to traditional medical pathways. Explore these avenues to enhance your expertise and contribute meaningfully to the healthcare industry.
