Technology Innovation Management Review

Top Research Topics at Technology Innovation Management Review?

The journal was organized to reinforce research efforts on Knowledge management, Marketing, Management, Entrepreneurship and Public relations. The study on Knowledge management presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Living lab. The study on Entrepreneurship presented in Technology Innovation Management Review intersects with subjects under the field of Economic growth.

• Knowledge management (14.49%)
• Marketing (12.12%)
• Management (10.28%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Social Entrepreneurship: Definition and Boundaries (189 citations)
• Living labs as open-innovation networks (179 citations)
• A Framework for Sustainable Circular Business Model Innovation (151 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Technology Innovation Management Review:

The main points discussed in the most cited publications deal with Knowledge management, Marketing, Living lab, Public relations and Entrepreneurship. The published papers about Critical success factor research are fields of study within Knowledge management but they also intertwine with concepts in Context (language use). The published papers facilitate discussions on Living lab that incorporate concepts from other fields like Open innovation, Co-creation, Process (engineering) and Value (ethics).

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Law
• Management
• The Internet

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The journal covers a variety of subjects, including Value proposition, Environmental resource management, Knowledge management, Distributed ledger and Blockchain. Issues in Value proposition were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Classical economics and Positive economics. It explores issues in Environmental resource management which can be linked to other research areas like Circulation (currency) and Glocalization.

While Knowledge management is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Multiple stakeholder, Service (business), Key (cryptography), Digital business and Competence (human resources). The studies in Distributed ledger featured incorporate elements of Social machines, Multidisciplinary approach and Commerce. The studies on Blockchain discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Engineering management, Supply chain, Supply chain management, Industrial organization and Early adopter.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• A Cross-Pollination of Ideas about Distributed Ledger Technological Innovation through a Multidisciplinary and Multisectoral lens: Insights from the Blockchain Technology Symposium ’21 (1 citations)
• Simulating a Biorefinery Ecosystem to Manage and Motivate Sustainable Regional Nutrient Circulation (1 citations)
• Global Market Entry for Finnish SME eCommerce Companies (1 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Technology Innovation Management Review (based on the number of publications) are:

• Chris McPhee (102 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Mika Westerlund (44 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Stoyan Tanev (39 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 5 less than at the previous edition,
• Seppo Leminen (31 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Dimitri Schuurman (23 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Technology Innovation Management Review (based on the number of publications) are:

• Carleton University (113 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Aalto University (25 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Laurea University of Applied Sciences (24 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Communications Security Establishment Canada (12 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Ghent University (11 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 97.30% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 100.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 0.00% of all publications and 0.00% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Prospects in the Field of Technology Innovation Management

The field of Technology Innovation Management offers an expansive array of career prospects. Graduates from this program can look forward to a wide range of opportunities in various sectors. One of the primary paths chosen by many is to become an urban planner. Urban planners are in high demand, especially in rapidly developing regions like Nevada. Urban planners are responsible for developing plans and programs for land use in their jurisdictions. They employ their skills to create communities, accommodate population growth, and revitalize physical facilities in towns, cities, counties, and metropolitan areas. To become an urban planner in Nevada, most employers prefer a minimum of a bachelor's degree in urban or regional planning, public administration, civil engineering, geography, or a related field from a program accredited by the Planning Accreditation Board (PAB). Many states, including Nevada, require at least a master's degree in a related field. Professional experience in planning, public administration, or a related field is usually required, ranging from one to three years. For individuals interested in pursuing a business-oriented career path, there are numerous top-tier business schools in Nevada. These schools offer a range of programs, from entrepreneurship to project management, that can help to prepare graduates for a prosperous career in Technology Innovation Management. In conclusion, the opportunities presented by a career in Technology Innovation Management are vast and varied, whether one chooses to focus on urban planning or explore other avenues. The skills and knowledge gained from studying this discipline equip graduates to make substantial contributions to their communities and the wider world.