0025-5769
Published by: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
https://www.nctm.org/Publications/Mathematics-Teacher_-Learning-and-Teaching-PK-12/
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 1220 | 10 | 11 | 3 |
The topics of Mathematics education, Mathematics instruction, Secondary education, Algebra over a field and Teaching method are the focal point of discussions in the journal. Connected Mathematics, Reform mathematics, Core-Plus Mathematics Project, Math wars and Integrated mathematics are some of the facets of Mathematics education tackled in the journal. It primarily discusses Connected Mathematics topics, particularly Comprehensive School Mathematics Program, Everyday Mathematics and Philosophy of mathematics education.
Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK–12 focused on Mathematics instruction research but expanded to cover Mathematical logic. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK–12 focuses on Algebra over a field as well as the interrelated topic of Algebra.
The most cited articles cover a variety of subjects, including Mathematics education, Connected Mathematics, Reform mathematics, Secondary education and Math wars. The presentations in the most cited articles discussing Mathematics education offer insights in topics such as Mathematics instruction, Teaching method, Core-Plus Mathematics Project, Integrated mathematics and Everyday Mathematics. While work presented in the journal publications provide substantial information on Secondary education, it also covers topics in Mathematics curriculum and Calculus (medicine).
The journal tackles a plethora of topics, such as Mathematics education, Mathematics instruction, Teaching method, Algebra over a field and Equity (finance). The in-depth study on Mathematics education also explores topics in the intersecting field of Task (project management). In it, Learner engagement, Quadratic equation, Logical reasoning, Mathematical model and Calculus are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Mathematics instruction research.
Some problems in Teaching method that were presented in the journal overlapped with concepts under Concept learning, Educational technology and Mathematical logic. The concepts on Equity (finance) presented in the journal can also apply to other research fields, including Central tendency, Qualitative research and Digital divide. The studies on Formative assessment discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Cooperative learning and Curriculum.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK–12 (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK–12 (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 30.77% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 9.88% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 1.23% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.11% of all publications and 77.78% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Jo Boaler;Tanya LaMar;Cathy Williams
(2021)Jessica Hunt;Mary Kay Stein
(2020)Nicholas H. Wasserman;Keith Weber;Timothy Fukawa-Connelly;Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos
(2020)Tracy E. Dobie;Miriam Gamoran Sherin
(2020)Hannah J. Nieman;Nicholas M. Kochmanski;Kara J. Jackson;Paul A. Cobb
(2020)For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, exploring diverse online degrees can open doors to rewarding careers. Interdisciplinary studies offer a flexible approach, combining multiple fields to tailor education. Those seeking affordability and versatility might consider the best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees, which provide broad knowledge applicable in various sectors.
History enthusiasts can deepen their expertise through affordable advanced education. The cheapest online history master's degree programs offer accessible pathways to enhance critical thinking, research, and analytical skills—qualities appreciated in education, research, and public policy.
Graduates interested in information management and archival work might explore library science. Identifying the best library schools in the USA ensures quality education while managing costs, which is essential for future librarians and information specialists.
For those considering careers in speech pathology but who do not have a background in this area, exploring slp bridge program online options can be a strategic move. These programs provide a bridge to gain the necessary qualifications for certification and practice.
Overall, the growing availability of online programs enhances accessibility, allowing students from diverse backgrounds to pursue meaningful careers in Social Sciences and Humanities efficiently and affordably.
