| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 229 | 62 | 87 | 16 |
| Ecology and Evolution | 465 | 12 | 16 | 8 |
The foci of Journal of Systematic Palaeontology are Paleontology, Zoology, Taxon, Genus and Cretaceous. The studies in Paleontology featured incorporate elements of Taxonomy (biology), Systematics, Anatomy and Fauna. Skull is a focus of the presented Anatomy works and it dives deep in Skull.
The journal addresses concerns in Zoology which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Sister group, Clade, Monophyly, Fossil Record and Cladistics. While work presented in Journal of Systematic Palaeontology provided substantial information on Taxon, it also covered topics in Evolutionary biology and Holotype. The Genus study tackling the subject of Type species is the focus of Journal of Systematic Palaeontology.
The presented studies in Cenomanian fall within the purview of Cretaceous but it also intertwines with topics in Burmese. The work on Ecology presented in the journal focuses on Biogeography in particular.
The journal publications investigate studies in Zoology, Paleontology, Taxon, Ecology and Sister group. Systematics is a focus of the presented Zoology works in the published articles and they dives deep in Systematics. The journal publications with studies in Paleontology featured incorporate elements of Taxonomy (biology) and Fauna.
The journal investigates studies in Paleontology, Evolutionary biology, Zoology, Cretaceous and Fauna. Some problems in Paleontology that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under Systematics, Macroevolution and Galeaspida. Topics in Evolutionary biology explored in it were investigated in conjunction with research in Basal (phylogenetics), Diversity (politics), Taxonomy (biology), Rodent and Cladistics.
Aside from Zoology, it also covered works in the field of Carnivora. The concepts on Cretaceous presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Appendage, Anatomy, Botany and Thylacocephala. While Fauna is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Modernization theory, Climate change and Lizard.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Systematic Palaeontology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Systematic Palaeontology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.67% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 39.29% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.14% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.00% of all publications and 28.57% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
James D. Holmes;John R. Paterson;Diego C. García-Bellido
(2020)Tara Selly;James D. Schiffbauer;Sarah M. Jacquet;Emily F. Smith
(2020)Jeremy A. F. Lockwood;Jeremy A. F. Lockwood;David M. Martill;Susannah C. R. Maidment
(2021)Paweł Jałoszyński;Xiao-Zhu Luo;Jörg U. Hammel;Shûhei Yamamoto
(2020)Paulo R. Romo de Vivar;Agustín G. Martinelli;Annie Schmaltz Hsiou;Marina Bento Soares;Marina Bento Soares
(2020)Andrew J. Moore;Paul Upchurch;Paul M. Barrett;James M. Clark
(2020)Min Wang;Jingmai K. O’Connor;Shuang Zhou;Zhonghe Zhou
(2020)Luca Pandolfi;Antoine Pierre-Olivier;Maia Bukhsianidze;David Lordkipanidze
(2021)Shook Ling Low;Tao Su;Tao Su;Teresa E. V. Spicer;Fei-Xiang Wu
(2020)Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from additional specialized education. For those interested in advancing within healthcare sectors linked to environmental health, programs like bsn to dnp programs offer a streamlined path to advanced nursing degrees. These programs help professionals blend ecological insights with healthcare expertise.
Choosing the right school is crucial. Understanding the nursing school acceptance rate can guide prospective students toward programs with higher admission chances, facilitating a smoother transition into health-related studies. Such knowledge empowers students when aligning their academic ambitions with program accessibility.
For learners aiming at leadership roles, online options like the best schools for healthcare administration online provide accelerated degree paths. These programs combine management skills with a solid understanding of ecological factors affecting public health.
Additionally, some students prefer programs that offer more flexible admission processes. Exploring nursing programs that don't require teas test can open alternative routes to entering healthcare fields, which complement ecological and evolutionary studies.
