World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
H-index 19

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

1387-1307

Published by: Springer

https://www.springer.com/journal/10877

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Medicine 1280 78 99 19

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 124
Documents by Best Scientists*: 139
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 2
SCIMAGO H-index: 64
SCIMAGO SJR: 0.585
Impact Factor: 2.2

Overview

Top Research Topics at Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing?

The concepts of Anesthesia, Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Internal medicine and Cardiology are tackled in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. Issues in Anesthesia were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Surgery and Blood pressure. Heart rate is a major topic of Blood pressure research.

While Anesthesiology is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of MEDLINE, Medical emergency, Intensive care unit, Intensive care medicine and Perioperative. The journal focuses on Cardiac output as well as the interrelated topic of Stroke volume.

  • Anesthesia (43.80%)
  • Anesthesiology (32.01%)
  • Intensive care (15.80%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. (1018 citations)
  • An introduction to bispectral analysis for the electroencephalogram (676 citations)
  • A regularity statistic for medical data analysis. (606 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing:

The published articles mainly tackle studies in Anesthesia, Intensive care, Anesthesiology, Surgery and Blood pressure. In addition to Anesthesia research, the journal articles aim to explore topics under Internal medicine, Pulse (signal processing) and Cardiology. The published papers address concerns in the field of Anesthesiology by exploring it in line with topics in Anesthetic which intersect with Electroencephalography subjects.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Cardiology

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The primary areas of discussion in the journal are Anesthesiology, Anesthesia, Internal medicine, Cardiology and Blood pressure. The studies in Anesthesiology featured incorporate elements of Perioperative, Intensive care unit, Intensive care and Emergency medicine. Anesthesia research discussed connects with the study of Randomized controlled trial.

Concepts in Tidal volume, as well as related topics in Mechanical ventilation, are covered in the Cardiology research presented in it. Mean arterial pressure is a key component of Blood pressure research discussed in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. Topics in Hemodynamics were tackled in line with various other fields like Stroke volume and Heart rate.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • COVID-19: Pulse oximeters in the spotlight. (9 citations)
  • Accuracy and precision of zero-heat-flux temperature measurements with the 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (8 citations)
  • Metrology part 1: definition of quality criteria. (8 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Dwayne R. Westenskow (44 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Thomas Scheeren (38 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
  • Stephen Edward Rees (32 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
  • Bernd Saugel (28 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Joachim S. Gravenstein (26 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (based on the number of publications) are:

  • University of Utah (99 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of Florida (86 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • University of California, San Diego (55 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • Yale University (47 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of California, Irvine (47 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 8.58% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 12.24% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 9.39% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.29% of all publications and 64.08% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Contribution of Georgia-based Institutions and Authors

In Georgia, there are numerous institutions working tirelessly to make significant contributions in the area of research in Clinical Monitoring and Computing. A notable instance is the number of professionals in Georgia pursuing the cheapest teaching credential program in georgia to better equip themselves in their field.

Statistics indicate that Georgian institutions are rising steadily in the ranks of contributions to scientific literature in Clinical Monitoring and Computing, both quantitatively and qualitatively, aligning its focus with the state's emphasis on strengthening its medical research sector.

A significant number of authors from Georgia have been recognized for their prolific research contributions to the Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, ranging from practicing physicians to distinguished professors. While the overarching aim of these authors is to advance their respective fields, their scholarly contributions also enhance Georgia's profile in the realm of clinical research.

Georgia-based authors have significantly contributed to various areas under the umbrella of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, including Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Cardiology among others. Their continuous commitment towards advancing scientific knowledge stands as a testament to Georgia's growing influence in Clinical Monitoring and Computing research.

Top Publications

  • Comparison of common perioperative blood loss estimation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lara Gerdessen;Patrick Meybohm;Patrick Meybohm;Suma Choorapoikayil;Eva Herrmann

    (2021)
    86 Citations
  • Mechanisms contributing to hypotension after anesthetic induction with sufentanil, propofol, and rocuronium: a prospective observational study

    Bernd Saugel;Bernd Saugel;Elisa-Johanna Bebert;Luisa Briesenick;Phillip Hoppe

    (2021)
    68 Citations
  • Does nociception monitor-guided anesthesia affect opioid consumption? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

    Fleur S Meijer;Marieke Niesters;Monique van Velzen;Chris H Martini

    (2020)
    49 Citations
  • Adaptive threshold-based alarm strategies for continuous vital signs monitoring.

    Mathilde C. van Rossum;Lyan B. Vlaskamp;Lyan B. Vlaskamp;Linda M. Posthuma;Maarten J. Visscher

    (2021)
    48 Citations
  • Performance of the Hypotension Prediction Index with non-invasive arterial pressure waveforms in non-cardiac surgical patients.

    Kamal Maheshwari;Sai Buddi;Zhongping Jian;Jos Settels

    (2021)
    41 Citations
  • Intra-abdominal hypertension in cardiac surgery patients: a multicenter observational sub-study of the Accuryn registry

    (2022)
    32 Citations
  • Preoperative heart rate variability as a predictor of perioperative outcomes: a systematic review without meta-analysis

    (2022)
    31 Citations
  • Towards autoregulation-oriented management after traumatic brain injury: increasing the reliability and stability of the CPPopt algorithm

    (2023)
    31 Citations
  • Hypotension Prediction Index with non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms (ClearSight): clinical performance in Gynaecologic Oncologic Surgery.

    Luciano Frassanito;Pietro Paolo Giuri;Francesco Vassalli;Alessandra Piersanti

    (2021)
    31 Citations
  • Metrology part 1: definition of quality criteria.

    Pierre Squara;Thomas W L Scheeren;Hollmann D Aya;Jan Bakker

    (2021)
    29 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Medicine in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways in healthcare. Nursing remains a popular option, especially through nursing programs that don't require teas, providing flexibility for those who prefer alternative admission processes.

Healthcare administration offers another promising avenue, with affordable programs designed to prepare graduates for leadership roles in medical institutions. Prospective students can consider the cheapest online MHA programs to gain administrative skills without extensive financial burden.

For those looking to enter nursing quickly, 6 month LPN programs online offer accelerated paths that lead to practical nursing roles and valuable hands-on experience in a short time frame.

Advanced degrees like a PhD in nursing enable healthcare professionals to contribute to research, education, and policy-making within the medical field, providing broader career opportunities beyond clinical practice.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal