| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 184 | 409 | 805 | 55 |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology aims to foster the development of research in Epidemiology, Internal medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Statistics and MEDLINE. In addition to Epidemiology research, it aims to explore topics under Cohort study, Demography, Public health, Pediatrics and Risk factor. It investigates Public health research which frequently intersects with Gerontology.
The research on Internal medicine tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Diabetes mellitus, Endocrinology, Surgery and Cardiology. Issues in Randomized controlled trial were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Research design, Physical therapy, Clinical trial and Confidence interval. It focuses on Physical therapy but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Quality of life and Psychometrics.
The Statistics study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Econometrics. The main emphasis of the journal is the subject of MEDLINE, focusing on Systematic review. While the journal focused on Systematic review, it was also able to explore topics like Meta-analysis and Evidence-based medicine.
The most cited publications mainly deal with areas of study such as Epidemiology, Statistics, MEDLINE, Physical therapy and Gerontology. The most cited papers explore topics in Epidemiology which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Demography, Incidence (epidemiology), Public health and Risk factor. The most cited articles with studies in Statistics featured incorporate elements of Meta-analysis and Econometrics.
The journal is mainly concerned with subjects like Randomized controlled trial, Logistic regression, Physical therapy, Quality (business) and Cancer screening. Some problems in Randomized controlled trial that were presented in the journal overlapped with concepts under Systematic review, Confidence interval, Meta-analysis, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Evaluating interventions. Logistic regression research featured in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Acute coronary syndrome, Bayesian information criterion, National registry, Goodness of fit and Confounding.
While Physical therapy is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Pharmacological treatment, Back pain, Observational study and Cohort. The overlapping concepts between Blinding and Psychological intervention are the key highlights of Quality (business) study. The journal explores topics in Cancer screening which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Demography, Stratified sampling, Generalizability theory and Lung cancer screening.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2022 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 28.57% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 28.57% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.29% of all publications and 28.57% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
In the field of clinical research and epidemiology, regulatory compliance and licensing play a crucial role. It is important to understand and follow the licensing requirements in your respective state to maintain professional integrity and adhere to ethical guidelines in the field. For instance, Rhode Island has its own set of specific regulations for nursing licensure to practice and conduct research in nursing epidemiology. You can learn more about the Rhode Island nursing license requirements on our dedicated page. Apart from licensure, compliance with regulations set by bodies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institute of Health (NIH) is crucial. They ensure that all clinical research adheres to the established scientific and ethical standards, safeguarding the rights, safety, and well-being of trial participants. Keeping up-to-date with policy changes in licensing and regulation, attending relevant training, and utilizing resources provided by professional organizations can help ensure the research aligns with current standards. It's important for studies to be designed and conducted under these compliance guidelines to maintain the research integrity, ensuring that its contributions to the field are valid and respected. Remember that adhering to licensing requirements and compliance regulations does not only back the credibility of your research, but also fortifies its acceptance in respected journals like the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Matthew J Page;Joanne E McKenzie;Patrick M Bossuyt;Isabelle Boutron
(2021)Nancy Santesso;Claire Glenton;Philipp Dahm;Paul Garner
(2020)Justin Clark;Paul Glasziou;Chris Del Mar;Alexandra Bannach-Brown
(2020)Simon Nusinovici;Yih Chung Tham;Marco Yu Chak Yan;Daniel Shu Wei Ting
(2020)Katherine J Lee;Kate M Tilling;Rosie P Cornish;Roderick J A Little
(2021)Farid Foroutan;Farid Foroutan;Gordon Guyatt;Victoria Zuk;Per Olav Vandvik
(2020)Jessie McGowan;Sharon Straus;David Moher;Etienne V Langlois
(2020)Johannes M Giesinger;Fanny L C Loth;Neil K Aaronson;Juan I Arraras
(2020)Holger J Schünemann;Reem A Mustafa;Jan Brozek;Karen R Steingart
(2020)Hanan Khalil;Hanan Khalil;Micah Dj. Peters;Andrea C. Tricco;Danielle Pollock
(2021)For those interested in healthcare but not pursuing a traditional medical degree, several online programs offer alternative career paths. Exploring an online MHA programs CAHME accredited is a great option for students aiming to enter healthcare administration with a strong foundation in management and operational skills.
Nursing professionals can advance their careers through flexible options like the doctor of nursing practice programs that allow specialization without the traditional clinical requirements, providing greater accessibility for working nurses.
Similarly, those interested in leadership roles can consider the best online DHA programs. These prepare graduates for high-level administrative positions, focusing on healthcare policy, finance, and organizational strategy.
Pharmacy remains a vital field within healthcare, and several universities offer online pharmacy programs. These programs provide the clinical knowledge and research skills required for advanced pharmacy practice or academic careers.
