| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 261 | 78 | 78 | 11 |
| Psychology | 438 | 142 | 167 | 15 |
Developmental psychology, Cognition, Neuropsychology, Cognitive psychology and Neuropsychological test are among the topics commonly tackled in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. The Developmental psychology study tackling the subject of Psychometrics is the focus of Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. Psychometrics study tackled is connected to the field of Test validity.
The concepts on Cognition presented in the journal can also apply to other research fields, including Dementia and Clinical psychology. Dementia research in it involves the investigation of Alzheimer's disease studies, all of which are linked to disciplines such as Degenerative disease. The in-depth study on Clinical psychology also explores topics in the intersecting field of Neurocognitive.
The journal explores studies in Neuropsychology as part of the wider topic of Psychiatry. Cognitive psychology research presented in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology encompasses a variety of subjects, including Semantic memory, Perception and Episodic memory. The study on Cognitive disorder featured in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology expounds on the topic of Memory disorder in particular.
The journal publications generally zeroe in on subjects such as Developmental psychology, Cognition, Neuropsychology, Neuropsychological test and Cognitive disorder. Psychometrics is a focus of the presented Developmental psychology works in the journal papers and they dives deep in Psychometrics. The most cited articles connects the study in Cognition with the closely related areas of Cognitive psychology.
The journal investigates areas of study like Cognition, Clinical psychology, Neuropsychology, Neuropsychological assessment and Cognitive psychology. Studies on Cognition discussed in it link to the field of Traumatic brain injury. Issues in Clinical psychology were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Test (assessment), Test validity, Functional impairment and Depression (differential diagnoses).
In Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Cross-validation and Psychometrics are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Test validity research. The Neuropsychology research dealing mostly with Neuropsychological test is the focus of it. The studies on Cognitive psychology discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Imaging genetics, Neuroimaging, Reading disability and Cognitive aging.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 17.65% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.76% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.65% of all publications and 52.94% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
A significant missing section that could enhance this article's depth in accordance with Google's Search Quality Guidelines would be a discussion on the career paths of contributing authors. Giving readers an insight into the professional journey of the primary authors could not only provide relevant context to the published works but also resonate with aspiring researchers in similar fields. If you are an aspiring researcher in the field of neuropsychology or if you're considering a career in academia, you might be interested in learning about the professional journeys of some of the experts who contribute to the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. Understanding their academic and professional background, the paths they've taken to reach their current positions, and the speech pathologist requirements in Kentucky they may have satisfied, could provide valuable insights.
From the breadth and depth of their research studies to their collaborative efforts, these authors offer diverse perspectives and considerable knowledge in the field of neuropsychology. Their diverse backgrounds and academic pursuits underscore the multifaceted nature of neuropsychology and strengthen the richness of the journal's content.
In our upcoming articles, we plan to profile some of these authors, delving into their academic backgrounds, areas of expertise, research interests, and notable achievements. Through these profiles, we hope to inspire and guide future researchers in this field. Stay tuned!
Margaret H Sibley
(2021)Claire Lancaster;Ivan Koychev;Jasmine Blane;Amy Chinner
(2020)Lisa A. Chudoba;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
(2020)Valentina Moro;Sahba Besharati;Michele Scandola;Sara Bertagnoli
(2021)Lauriane A. Spreij;Antonia F. Ten Brink;Antonia F. Ten Brink;Johanna M.A. Visser-Meily;Tanja C.W. Nijboer
(2020)For those interested in careers connected to psychology, several online degree options provide flexible and accelerated paths. An online human services degree is a great starting point for students seeking to enter helping professions. These programs focus on community support and social services, often requiring less time than traditional degrees.
Career changers, especially educators, may find opportunities in speech pathology. Resources like the guide on how to make a career change for teachers explain the steps to transition smoothly into this rewarding field. This path often involves additional specialized training.
To become a certified Speech-Language Pathologist, it is essential to complete an asha accredited slp programs. These programs are designed to meet professional standards, ensuring graduates are qualified for licensure and practice across various settings.
For those without a background in speech pathology, speech pathology bridge programs offer a practical route. These tailored programs help non-SLP majors acquire the necessary knowledge and credentials to enter the field effectively.