| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 452 | 135 | 225 | 17 |
The scientific interests tackled in the journal are Traditional medicine, Stereochemistry, Pharmacognosy, Botany and Biochemistry. Traditional medicine research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Antimicrobial, Antibacterial agent and Phytotherapy. Many of the studies tackled connect Antibacterial agent with a similar field of study like Antibacterial activity.
It explores research in Stereochemistry and the adjacent study of Cytotoxicity. Fitoterapia explores issues in Cytotoxicity which can be linked to other research areas like Cytotoxic T cell and Cell culture. Fitoterapia explores topics in Pharmacognosy which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Flavonoid, Pharmacology and Bark.
The majority of Biochemistry studies presented zero in on Antioxidant.
The journal publications are mainly concerned with subjects like Traditional medicine, Pharmacognosy, Botany, Phytotherapy and Pharmacology. While the journal publications focused on Traditional medicine, they were also able to explore topics like Antimicrobial and Antibacterial agent. The most cited publications facilitate discussions on Pharmacognosy that incorporate concepts from other fields like Ethyl acetate, Stereochemistry and Bark.
Stereochemistry, Traditional medicine, Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Circular dichroism and Cytotoxicity are among the topics commonly tackled in Fitoterapia. The studies on Stereochemistry discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of IC50, Phytochemical and Ic50 values. Phytochemical study tackled is connected to the field of Anti-inflammatory.
While work presented in Fitoterapia provided substantial information on Anti-inflammatory, it also covered topics in Lipopolysaccharide and Nitric oxide. Interdisciplinary research on topics like Circular dichroism and Stereocenter are the foci of the journal. The work on Cytotoxicity tackled in it brings together disciplines like Cytotoxic T cell and Cell culture, Human cancer, MTT assay.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Fitoterapia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Fitoterapia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.49% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 33.84% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.08% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.15% of all publications and 42.93% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Yuan Xiong;Guang-Hao Zhu;Hao-Nan Wang;Qing Hu
(2021)Mengzhen Cheng;Jianqing Zhang;Lin Yang;Shijie Shen
(2021)Abd. Malik;Hamidreza Ardalani;Syariful Anam;Laura Mikél McNair
(2020)Giovanni Appendino;Pietro Allegrini;Eric de Combarieu;Federico Novicelli
(2022)Mary Nokuthula Sibanyoni;Sushil Kumar Chaudhary;Weiyang Chen;Hamid-Reza Adhami
(2020)Xiang-Hong Liu;Xu-Liang Hou;Yin-Ping Song;Bin-Gui Wang
(2020)Miena Mikayoulou;Fabian Mayr;Veronika Temml;Arjun Pandian
(2021)Ishaq Muhammad;Syed Shams ul Hassan;Suet Cheung;Xiaoqing Li
(2021)Vaderament-A Nchiozem-Ngnitedem;Leonidah Kerubo Omosa;Kibrom Gebreheiwot Bedane;Solomon Derese
(2020)Ruifei Zhang;Qiang Guo;Edward J. Kennelly;Edward J. Kennelly;Chunlin Long;Chunlin Long
(2020)Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities in healthcare, research, and pharmaceuticals. Many students explore advanced education options such as pharmd online programs, which provide flexible pathways to becoming licensed pharmacists while balancing work or personal commitments.
For those already in the nursing field, transitioning to higher qualifications is made easier through some of the best rn to bsn programs. These online courses enhance clinical knowledge and open new doors in healthcare leadership and specialized nursing careers.
Accelerated study options, such as accelerated pharm d programs, fast-track students into the pharmaceutical industry, reducing the time spent in school without sacrificing quality education.
Those considering careers beyond the lab might explore roles in pharmaceutical sales, where scientific knowledge meets business. If you’re curious about earnings and job prospects, learn more about how much do pharmaceutical reps make to evaluate if this pathway aligns with your goals.
