| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 126 | 43 | 47 | 16 |
| Environmental Sciences | 364 | 39 | 37 | 15 |
| Engineering and Technology | 416 | 41 | 67 | 19 |
The aim of Biosystems Engineering is to expand the discussion of research in Environmental engineering, Water content, Artificial intelligence, Hydrology and Agronomy. The journal explores topics in Environmental engineering which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Ventilation (architecture), Greenhouse and Manure. The research on Water content tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Moisture and Soil science.
While Artificial intelligence is the focus of Biosystems Engineering, it also provided insights into the studies of Computer vision and Pattern recognition.
The most cited papers are organized to address concerns in the fields of Water content, Artificial intelligence, Environmental engineering, Hydrology and Moisture. The most cited articles with studies in Artificial intelligence featured incorporate elements of Computer vision and Pattern recognition. In addition to Hydrology research, the most cited publications aim to explore topics under Soil science, Airflow, Greenhouse and Ventilation (architecture).
The journal generally zeroes in on subjects such as Artificial intelligence, Pattern recognition, Soil science, Water content and Mechanics. The work on Artificial intelligence addressed in the journal expands to the thematically related Computer vision. Pattern recognition research featured in it incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Pixel, Field (computer science), Feature (computer vision) and Machine vision.
The concepts on Water content presented in Biosystems Engineering can also apply to other research fields, including Moisture and Soil water. The majority of Mechanics studies are focused on the issues of Discrete element method.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Biosystems Engineering (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Biosystems Engineering (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 9.76% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 25.41% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.65% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 12.97% of all publications and 52.97% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Andrés Villa-Henriksen;Gareth T.C. Edwards;Liisa A. Pesonen;Ole Green
(2020)Aijing Feng;Jianfeng Zhou;Earl D. Vories;Kenneth A. Sudduth
(2020)Rekha Raja;Thuy T. Nguyen;David C. Slaughter;Steven A. Fennimore
(2020)Jean Frederic Isingizwe Nturambirwe;Umezuruike Linus Opara
(2020)Lefteris Benos;Avital Bechar;Dionysis Bochtis
(2020)Meina Zhang;Jianfeng Zhou;Kenneth A. Sudduth;Newell R. Kitchen
(2020)Jing Zhou;Jianfeng Zhou;Heng Ye;Liakat Ali
(2021)Alireza Sanaeifar;Xiaoli Li;Yong He;Zhenxiong Huang
(2021)For students pursuing Plant Science and Agronomy in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Hybrid educational options, such as hybrid absn programs, showcase how flexible learning models allow professionals to gain critical skills quickly without pausing their careers.
Similarly, accelerated healthcare programs like the nurse practitioner course highlight the importance of efficient, well-structured curricula to support workforce demands. These approaches resonate with trends in agronomy education where practical skills combined with science accelerate readiness for agricultural innovation jobs.
Moreover, options like the fastest rn to bsn program emphasize the value of fast-track pathways for career advancement, mirrored in agricultural fields where students can move rapidly from foundational knowledge to specialized expertise.
Lastly, bridging programs such as rn to np programs illustrate how career progression through layered learning can motivate lifelong education—a principle equally important for agronomy professionals aiming for leadership roles or research positions.