International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP)

This ranking presents a comprehensive list of scientific conferences within the field of Computer Science, meticulously curated to provide valuable insights into the most influential gatherings in the discipline. The ranking has been prepared by Research.com, recognized as one of the leading websites for science research across all major fields. Since 2014, Research.com has delivered trusted data on scientific contributions and has become a reputable source for rigorous and reliable research analytics.

Conference positions in this ranking are determined by a unique bibliometric score, a metric developed exclusively by Research.com, which reflects both the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have contributed to each conference over the preceding three years. This ensures an objective and multi-dimensional evaluation of academic influence and the breadth of scientific leadership represented at these events.

The Impact Score values featured in this ranking were collected as of 2024-11-27, guaranteeing up-to-date and relevant metrics for stakeholders and academics. The ranking process itself entailed a detailed examination and rigorous analysis, involving more than 2,742 conferences. These conferences were selected from an extensive review of over 148,739 scientific documents, authored in the last three years by a cohort of 13,184 prominent scientists recognized for their expertise and contributions to Computer Science.

For a comprehensive overview of the methodology employed and the criteria considered in the computation of the ranking scores, please refer to our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (based on the number of publications) are:

• Senthil Yogamani (7 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition,
• Jürgen Döllner (5 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition,
• Domenec Puig (4 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Sebastiano Battiato (4 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition,
• Giovanni Maria Farinella (4 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (based on the number of publications) are:

• Valeo (7 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition,
• Chemnitz University of Technology (6 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• Sapienza University of Rome (6 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition,
• State University of Campinas (5 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition,
• Hasso Plattner Institute (5 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2019 edition, 6.99% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 19.72% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 10.33% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 21.13% of all publications and 48.83% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.