International Conference on Materials and Manufacturing Technologies (ICMMT)

The ranking featured on this page presents a comprehensive evaluation of scientific conferences in the field of Engineering and Technology. Compiled by Research.com—a leading authority in the provision of reliable, data-driven insights into science research since 2014—this ranking leverages robust, transparent methodologies to provide trusted assessments across all major scientific domains, including Engineering and Technology.

Each conference’s position in this ranking is determined using a proprietary bibliometric score uniquely developed by Research.com. This metric is derived from an analysis of the estimated h-index and the number of distinguished scientists who have participated in the conference over the preceding three years, ensuring a nuanced, holistic measure of both impact and scientific engagement. The ranking incorporates Impact Score values collected as of November 27, 2024, to ensure the most current and relevant information is reflected.

The evaluation process entailed a rigorous inspection of more than 2,262 conferences, selected following an exhaustive examination of over 26,934 scientific documents published within the last three years. This analysis involved contributions from 9,385 leading and widely respected scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology, underscoring the depth and breadth of research underpinning this ranking.

Further information regarding the methodology behind the computation of ranking scores, including in-depth details about data sources and analytical procedures, can be found on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (based on the number of publications) are:

• Zhenghe Feng (48 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Qing-Xin Chu (38 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 7 less than at the previous edition,
• Xin Lv (34 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 10 less than at the previous edition,
• Xiaowei Shi (32 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 12 less than at the previous edition,
• R. S. Chen (31 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (200 papers) published 24 papers at the last edition, 42 less than at the previous edition,
• Xidian University (138 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 35 less than at the previous edition,
• Southeast University (124 papers) published 20 papers at the last edition, 17 less than at the previous edition,
• Nanjing University of Science and Technology (108 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition, 17 less than at the previous edition,
• Beijing Institute of Technology (94 papers) published 23 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2016 edition, 15.43% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 46.35% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 18.98% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.23% of all publications and 20.44% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.