World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
20265
World Ranking
5479
National Ranking
137

Thomas W. Healy publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Healy sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 171 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Thomas W. Healy D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Healy sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to mineral-water interfacial phenomena, their application to mineral processing, and leadership in industry-government-academic cooperation.

Overview

Thomas W. Healy is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their academic work is recognized in the field of mineral-water interfacial phenomena and its practical applications within mineral processing. This area of study focuses on the interactions at the boundary between mineral surfaces and water, which has implications for industrial processes involving materials extraction and purification.

Healy has been acknowledged for contributions to industry-government-academic cooperation, highlighting a role that extends beyond traditional research to include collaborative leadership across sectors. This is reflected in an award received in 2008, when Healy was named a Member of the National Academy of Engineering for specific contributions to the scientific understanding and application of mineral-water interfaces and for fostering partnerships among different institutional stakeholders.

While detailed records of Healy's recent papers, co-authorship networks, and specific publication venues are not available, the distinguished recognition and primary affiliation indicate an established presence in their scientific community, particularly at the University of Melbourne.

Given the lack of publicly available data on detailed research outputs such as papers, subfields, and book publications, the focus remains on the known main field of study and professional role as a researcher and collaborator in mineral processing and related scientific inquiry.

Best Publications

  • Mutual coagulation of colloidal dispersions

    R. Hogg;T. W. Healy;D. W. Fuerstenau

  • Site-binding model of the electrical double layer at the oxide/water interface

    David E. Yates;Samuel Levine;Thomas W. Healy

  • Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide—water interface. III. A thermodynamic model of adsorption

    Robert O James;Thomas W Healy

  • Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide—water interface. I. Co(II) adsorption on SiO2 and TiO2 as model systems

    Robert O James;Thomas W Healy

  • Ionizable surface group models of aqueous interfaces

    Thomas W. Healy;Lee R. White

  • Surfactant Adsorption at the Solid—Liquid Interface—Dependence of Mechanism on Chain Length

    P. Somasundaran;Thomas W. Healy;D. W. Fuerstenau

  • Accurate analytic expressions for the surface charge density/surface potential relationship and double-layer potential distribution for a spherical colloidal particle

    Hiroyuki Ohshima;Thomas W Healy;Lee R White

  • Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide—water interface. II. Charge reversal of SiO2 and TiO2 colloids by adsorbed Co(II), La(III), and Th(IV) as model systems

    Robert O James;Thomas W Healy

  • Surface chemistry-rheology relationships in concentrated mineral suspensions

    Stephen B. Johnson;George V. Franks;Peter J. Scales;David V. Boger

  • Electrokinetics of the silica-solution interface: a flat plate streaming potential study

    Peter J. Scales;Franz Grieser;Thomas W. Healy;Lee R. White

  • Approximate analytic expressions for the electrophoretic mobility of spherical colloidal particles and the conductivity of their dilute suspensions

    Hiroyuki Ohshima;Thomas W. Healy;Lee R. White

  • Regulation of surface potential at amphoteric surfaces during particle–particle interaction

    D. Chan;J. W. Perram;L. R. White;T. W. Healy

  • Double Layer Forces between Heterogeneous Charged Surfaces

    S. J. Miklavic;D. Y. C. Chan;L. R. White;T. W. Healy

  • RHEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF ADSORBATE-MEDIATED SHORT-RANGE STERIC FORCES IN CONCENTRATED DISPERSIONS

    Yee Kwong Leong;Peter J. Scales;Thomas W. Healy;David V. Boger

  • Shear yield stress of partially flocculated colloidal suspensions

    Peter J. Scales;Stephen B. Johnson;Thomas W. Healy;Prakash C. Kapur

  • The structure of the silica/electrolyte interface

    David E Yates;Thomas W Healy

  • Electrokinetics of the muscovite mica-aqueous solution interface

    Peter J. Scales;Franz Grieser;Thomas W. Healy

  • Mechanism of anion adsorption at the ferric and chromic oxide/water interfaces

    D.E Yates;T.W Healy

  • Coagulation and electrokinetic behavior of TiO2 and Al2O3 colloidal dispersions

    G.R Wiese;T.W Healy

  • Sedimentation velocity and potential in a dilute suspension of charged spherical colloidal particles

    Hiroyuki Ohshima;Thomas W. Healy;Lee R. White;Richard W. O'Brien

Frequent Co-Authors

Franz Grieser
Franz Grieser University of Melbourne
Peter J. Scales
Peter J. Scales University of Melbourne
Lee R. White
Lee R. White University of South Australia
David V. Boger
David V. Boger University of Melbourne
Calum J. Drummond
Calum J. Drummond RMIT University
Derek Y. C. Chan
Derek Y. C. Chan Swinburne University of Technology
John Ralston
John Ralston Adelaide University
Simon Biggs
Simon Biggs University of Western Australia
Hiroyuki Ohshima
Hiroyuki Ohshima Tokyo University of Science
George V. Franks
George V. Franks University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree opens multiple avenues, including specialized fields like forensic science and criminal justice. Many students are now opting for flexible learning by exploring a forensic science degree online, which blends chemical principles with criminal investigations.

For those interested in the psychological aspects related to crime, forensic psychology master's programs offer focused training that combines behavioral science with legal frameworks, enhancing career prospects in law enforcement and counseling.

Career opportunities in these areas are diverse. The forensic science careers sector continues to grow, fueled by advancements in technology and forensic methodologies, requiring professionals proficient in both chemistry and criminal analysis.

However, cost considerations remain important. Understanding how much does a criminal justice degree cost can help prospective students budget effectively and choose programs that fit their financial goals without compromising quality.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. Healy

Recently Published Articles