World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
46
Citations
17497
World Ranking
1312
National Ranking
586

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
17939
World Ranking
4449
National Ranking
1276

Thomas Strohmer publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Strohmer sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 138 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Thomas Strohmer D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Strohmer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Strohmer is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research portfolio primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a specific focus on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computer Science Applications, and Statistics and Probability.

The scientist's work extensively covers key topics such as Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Cryptography and Data Security, Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing, Random Matrices and Applications, Complex Network Analysis Techniques, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, and Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs.

The publication record features contributions to various scientific venues, reflecting a strong presence in both preprint and peer-reviewed outlets. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science
  • Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
  • Foundations of Computational Mathematics
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Thomas Strohmer has collaborated regularly with several researchers. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Roman Vershynin
  • March T. Boedihardjo
  • Shizhou Xu
  • Shaofeng Deng
  • Junda Sheng

Among recent scientific papers, notable works include the following:

  • "Use of machine-learning algorithms to aid in the early detection of leptospirosis in dogs" (2022), published in Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
  • "Covariance's Loss is Privacy's Gain: Computationally Efficient, Private and Accurate Synthetic Data" (2022), published in Foundations of Computational Mathematics
  • "Private Sampling: A Noiseless Approach for Generating Differentially Private Synthetic Data" (2022), published in SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science
  • "Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical Framework" (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • "Private measures, random walks, and synthetic data" (2024), published in Probability Theory and Related Fields

Best Publications

  • Grassmannian beamforming for multiple-input multiple-output wireless systems

    D.J. Love;R.W. Heath;T. Strohmer

  • PhaseLift: Exact and Stable Signal Recovery from Magnitude Measurements via Convex Programming

    Emmanuel J. Candès;Thomas Strohmer;Vladislav Voroninski

  • High-Resolution Radar via Compressed Sensing

    M.A. Herman;T. Strohmer

  • Gabor Analysis and Algorithms: Theory and Applications

    Hans G. Feichtinger;T. Strohmer

  • GRASSMANNIAN FRAMES WITH APPLICATIONS TO CODING AND COMMUNICATION

    Thomas Strohmer;Robert W Heath

  • Phase Retrieval via Matrix Completion

    Emmanuel J. Candès;Yonina C. Eldar;Thomas Strohmer;Vladislav Voroninski

  • A Randomized Kaczmarz Algorithm with Exponential Convergence

    Thomas Strohmer;Roman Vershynin

  • Designing structured tight frames via an alternating projection method

    J.A. Tropp;I.S. Dhillon;R.W. Heath;T. Strohmer

  • General Deviants: An Analysis of Perturbations in Compressed Sensing

    M.A. Herman;T. Strohmer

  • Compressed sensing radar

    M. Herman;T. Strohmer

  • Efficient numerical methods in non-uniform sampling theory

    Hans G. Feichtinger;Karlheinz Gröchenig;Thomas Strohmer

  • Optimal OFDM design for time-frequency dispersive channels

    T. Strohmer;S. Beaver

  • Gabor Analysis and Algorithms

    Hans G. Feichtinger;Thomas Strohmer

  • Advances in Gabor Analysis

    Hans G. Feichtinger;Thomas Strohmer

  • Application of time-reversal with MMSE equalizer to UWB communications

    T. Strohmer;M. Emami;J. Hansen;G. Papanicolaou

  • Rapid, Robust, and Reliable Blind Deconvolution via Nonconvex Optimization

    Xiaodong Li;Shuyang Ling;Thomas Strohmer;Ke Wei

  • Self-calibration and biconvex compressive sensing

    Shuyang Ling;Thomas Strohmer

  • Compressed Remote Sensing of Sparse Objects

    Albert C. Fannjiang;Thomas Strohmer;Pengchong Yan

  • Sparse Signal Processing Concepts for Efficient 5G System Design

    Gerhard Wunder;Holger Boche;Thomas Strohmer;Peter Jung

  • Constructing packings in grassmannian manifolds via alternating projection

    Inderjit S. Dhillon;Robert W. Heath;Thomas Strohmer;Joel A. Tropp

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert W. Heath
Robert W. Heath University of California, San Diego
Hans G. Feichtinger
Hans G. Feichtinger University of Vienna
Holger Rauhut
Holger Rauhut RWTH Aachen University
Gitta Kutyniok
Gitta Kutyniok Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Joel A. Tropp
Joel A. Tropp California Institute of Technology
Emmanuel J. Candès
Emmanuel J. Candès Stanford University
Inderjit S. Dhillon
Inderjit S. Dhillon Google (United States)
Benjamin Friedlander
Benjamin Friedlander University of California, Santa Cruz
Arogyaswami Paulraj
Arogyaswami Paulraj Stanford University
Yonina C. Eldar
Yonina C. Eldar Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse and rewarding career paths. Many graduates leverage their analytical skills by pursuing advanced business degrees, such as an fastest mba online program. These accelerated options allow professionals to quickly enhance their managerial and strategic abilities.

Additionally, a masters in marketing offers another promising route. With a solid foundation in quantitative analysis, math graduates excel in data-driven marketing roles where interpreting consumer data is key.

Many online platforms also highlight the benefits of a 1 year mba program, providing an efficient path to leadership positions. These programs often accommodate working professionals looking to boost their credentials without a lengthy time commitment.

For those concerned about prior coursework, exploring online MBA options that accept transfer credits can reduce time and cost. By choosing from the best online mba transfer credits programs, students can tailor their academic journey to fit their professional background and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Strohmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles