World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
39
Citations
5548
World Ranking
2149
National Ranking
49

Tae Jo Ko publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tae Jo Ko sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 348 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Tae Jo Ko D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tae Jo Ko sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Optimization of feedrate in a face milling operation using a surface roughness model

    Unknown

  • The effect of spindle speed, feed-rate and machining time to the surface roughness and burr formation of Aluminum Alloy 1100 in micro-milling operation

    Unknown

  • NURBS interpolator for constant material removal rate in open NC machine tools

    Unknown

  • Study on chisel edge drilling behavior and step drill structure on delamination in drilling CFRP

    Unknown

  • Prediction of surface roughness in abrasive water jet machining of CFRP composites using regression analysis

    Unknown

  • Bimetallic Ni–Co MOF@PAN modified electrospun separator enhances high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries

    Unknown

  • Influence of machining parameters and tool structure on cutting force and hole wall damage in drilling CFRP with stepped drills

    Unknown

  • A dynamic surface roughness model for face milling

    Unknown

  • Rotary ultrasonic machining of woven CFRP composite in a cryogenic environment

    Unknown

  • A nano-silica/polyacrylonitrile/polyimide composite separator for advanced fast charging lithium-ion batteries

    Waqas Ul Arifeen;Jungwook Choi;Kisoo Yoo;Jaesool Shim

  • Surface roughness of two-frequency elliptical vibration texturing (TFEVT) method for micro-dimple pattern process

    Unknown

  • End mill design and machining via cutting simulation

    Unknown

  • Surface-modified electrospun polyacrylonitrile nano-membrane for a lithium-ion battery separator based on phase separation mechanism

    Unknown

  • Selection of the Machining Inclination Angle in High-Speed Ball End Milling

    Unknown

  • Micro-dimple pattern process and orthogonal cutting force analysis of elliptical vibration texturing

    Unknown

  • Measurement of burr removal rate and analysis of machining parameters in ultrasonic assisted dry EDM (US-EDM) for deburring drilled holes in CFRP composite

    Unknown

  • On-line monitoring of tool breakage in face milling using a self-organized neural network

    T.J. Ko;D.W. Cho;M.Y. Jung

  • Chipping minimization in drilling ceramic materials with rotary ultrasonic machining

    Unknown

  • Surface Integrity and Machineability in Intermittent Hard Turning

    Unknown

  • Cutting state monitoring in milling by a neural network

    Tae Jo Ko;Dong Woo Cho

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaesool Shim
Jaesool Shim Yeungnam University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring educational options related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open diverse career pathways. For those interested in technical fields with human interaction components, understanding the different types of counseling degrees can provide insights into interdisciplinary roles that blend psychology and engineering.

If time efficiency is a priority, you might want to consider the fastest and easiest counseling degree programs, which offer streamlined curriculums suited for busy professionals looking to pivot or supplement their engineering careers.

For individuals focused on behavioral sciences within technological environments, programs like the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis provide specialized skills that are increasingly valued in sectors such as human factors engineering and ergonomics.

Additionally, knowing how to get into slp grad school requirements and acceptance rate can guide those considering speech-language pathology as a complementary career, especially relevant in rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology development.

Integrating these diverse educational avenues with core engineering expertise enhances career flexibility and innovation potential in today's evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Tae Jo Ko

Recently Published Articles