World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
36
Citations
4556
World Ranking
2561
National Ranking
32

Stefan Hickel publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Hickel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 223 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Stefan Hickel D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Hickel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • An adaptive local deconvolution method for implicit LES

    Stefan Hickel;Nikolaus A. Adams;J. Andrzej Domaradzki

  • Analysis of unsteady behaviour in shockwave turbulent boundary layer interaction

    Muzio Grilli;Peter J. Schmid;Stefan Hickel;Nikolaus A. Adams

  • Numerical modelling and investigation of symmetric and asymmetric cavitation bubble dynamics

    E. Lauer;X.Y. Hu;S. Hickel;N.A. Adams

  • Unsteady effects of strong shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction at high Reynolds number

    Vito Pasquariello;Stefan Hickel;Nikolaus A. Adams

  • A conservative immersed interface method for Large-Eddy Simulation of incompressible flows

    M. Meyer;A. Devesa;S. Hickel;X. Y. Hu

  • Large-eddy simulation of nitrogen injection at trans- and supercritical conditions

    Unknown

  • Multi-component vapor-liquid equilibrium model for LES of high-pressure fuel injection and application to ECN Spray A

    Unknown

  • Subgrid-scale modeling for implicit large eddy simulation of compressible flows and shock-turbulence interaction

    Stefan Hickel;Christian P. Egerer;Johan Larsson

  • Implicit subgrid-scale modeling by adaptive deconvolution

    N. A. Adams;S. Hickel;S. Franz

  • Large-eddy simulation of turbulent cavitating flow in a micro channel

    Christian P. Egerer;Stefan Hickel;Steffen J. Schmidt;Nikolaus A. Adams

  • On the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability evolving from a deterministic multimode planar interface

    V. K. Tritschler;B. J. Olson;S. K. Lele;S. Hickel

  • Large-eddy simulation of passive shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction control

    Vito Pasquariello;Muzio Grilli;Stefan Hickel;Nikolaus A. Adams

  • Assessment of Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation with a Conservative Immersed Interface Method for turbulent cylinder flow

    Mar Meyer;S. Hickel;N. A. Adams

  • Large-eddy simulation of cavitating nozzle flow and primary jet break-up

    F. Örley;T. Trummler;S. Hickel;S. Hickel;Mihatsch

  • Large-eddy simulation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression–expansion ramp

    Muzio Grilli;Stefan Hickel;Nikolaus A. Adams

  • On implicit subgrid-scale modeling in wall-bounded flows

    S. Hickel;N. A. Adams

  • Numerical investigation of collapsing cavity arrays

    E. Lauer;X. Y. Hu;S. Hickel;N. A. Adams

  • A cut-cell finite volume - finite element coupling approach for fluid-structure interaction in compressible flow

    Vito Pasquariello;Georg Hammerl;Felix Örley;Stefan Hickel

  • Implicit subgrid-scale modeling for large-eddy simulation of passive-scalar mixing

    S. Hickel;N. A. Adams;N. N. Mansour

  • Efficient implicit LES method for the simulation of turbulent cavitating flows

    Christian P. Egerer;Steffen J. Schmidt;Stefan Hickel;Nikolaus A. Adams

Frequent Co-Authors

Nikolaus A. Adams
Nikolaus A. Adams Technical University of Munich
Xiangyu Hu
Xiangyu Hu Technical University of Munich
Johan Larsson
Johan Larsson University of Maryland, College Park
J. Andrzej Domaradzki
J. Andrzej Domaradzki University of Southern California
B. W. van Oudheusden
B. W. van Oudheusden Delft University of Technology
Wolfgang A. Wall
Wolfgang A. Wall Technical University of Munich
Sanjiva K. Lele
Sanjiva K. Lele Stanford University
Bernhard Weigand
Bernhard Weigand University of Stuttgart
Bendiks Jan Boersma
Bendiks Jan Boersma Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their educational horizons beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, related online degrees offer flexible and accessible options. Exploring fields like speech-language pathology reveals important factors to consider, such as program difficulty and acceptance rates. Understanding the slp grad school acceptance rate can help prospective students gauge their chances and better prepare their applications.

Many students seek the easiest online slp programs to get into, especially when balancing studies with work or family commitments. These programs often provide approachable entry points without compromising on education quality.

Cost is a significant consideration, and the online speech pathology degree costs and fees vary widely across institutions. Prospective students should carefully compare tuition rates and fees to make informed decisions aligned with their budget.

Additionally, veterans benefit from specialized resources and support. Many institutions offer tailored options, making it easier for former military members to transition into new careers through online speech pathology degree programs for veterans.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Hickel

Recently Published Articles