World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
5829
World Ranking
8132
National Ranking
3486

Scott C. Matthews publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott C. Matthews sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Scott C. Matthews D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott C. Matthews sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott C. Matthews is primarily affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research is grounded mainly in the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to several subfields including Epidemiology, Surgery, Clinical Psychology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Neurology.

The scientist's work covers multiple specialized topics, among which are:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Municipal Solid Waste Management

Recent published papers by Scott C. Matthews include:

  • Lithium Treatment in the Prevention of Repeat Suicide-Related Outcomes in Veterans With Major Depression or Bipolar Disorder, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Global knowledge base for municipal solid waste management: Framework development and application in waste generation prediction, 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Detection of Chronic Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Support Vector Machines, 2022, Diagnostics
  • Resting-state magnetoencephalography source magnitude imaging with deep-learning neural network for classification of symptomatic combat-related mild traumatic brain injury, 2021, Human Brain Mapping
  • Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity on Body Composition Analysis is a Significant Predictor of Mortality in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Longitudinal Observational Study, 2023, World Journal of Surgery

The frequent publication venues for their research are diverse and include:

  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Diagnostics
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • World Journal of Surgery

Scott C. Matthews has collaborated multiple times with several coauthors. Frequent collaborators include Michael J. Ostacher, Deborah L. Harrington, Annemarie Angeles-Quinto, Ashley Robb-Swan, and Sharon Nichols.

Best Publications

  • Association of major depressive disorder with altered functional brain response during anticipation and processing of heat pain.

    Irina A Strigo;Alan N Simmons;Scott C Matthews;Arthur D Bud Craig

  • Functional subdivisions within anterior cingulate cortex and their relationship to autonomic nervous system function.

    Scott C Matthews;Martin P Paulus;Alan N Simmons;Richard A Nelesen

  • Anticipation of aversive visual stimuli is associated with increased insula activation in anxiety-prone subjects.

    Alan Simmons;Irina Strigo;Scott C. Matthews;Martin P. Paulus;Martin P. Paulus

  • Anticipation of emotionally aversive visual stimuli activates right insula.

    Alan Simmons;Scott C. Matthews;Murray B. Stein;Martin P. Paulus

  • Functional Activation and Neural Networks in Women with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Related to Intimate Partner Violence

    Alan N. Simmons;Martin P. Paulus;Steven R. Thorp;Scott C. Matthews

  • Decreased functional coupling of the amygdala and supragenual cingulate is related to increased depression in unmedicated individuals with current major depressive disorder.

    Scott C. Matthews;Scott C. Matthews;Irina A. Strigo;Alan N. Simmons;Alan N. Simmons;Tony T. Yang

  • Adolescents With Major Depression Demonstrate Increased Amygdala Activation

    Tony T. Yang;Alan N. Simmons;Alan N. Simmons;Scott C. Matthews;Scott C. Matthews;Susan F. Tapert

  • Selective activation of the nucleus accumbens during risk-taking decision making.

    Scott C. Matthews;Alan N. Simmons;Scott D. Lane;Martin P. Paulus;Martin P. Paulus

  • Intolerance of uncertainty correlates with insula activation during affective ambiguity

    Alan Simmons;Scott C. Matthews;Martin P. Paulus;Murray B. Stein

  • A multimodal imaging study in U.S. veterans of Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom with and without major depression after blast-related concussion.

    Scott C. Matthews;Irina A. Strigo;Alan N. Simmons;Ryan M. O'Connell;Ryan M. O'Connell

  • Altered insula activation during pain anticipation in individuals recovered from anorexia nervosa: evidence of interoceptive dysregulation.

    Irina A. Strigo;Scott C. Matthews;Scott C. Matthews;Alan N. Simmons;Tyson Oberndorfer

  • Neural correlates of altered pain response in women with posttraumatic stress disorder from intimate partner violence.

    Irina A. Strigo;Alan N. Simmons;Scott C. Matthews;Scott C. Matthews;Erin M. Grimes

  • Neural circuitry of PTSD with or without mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis.

    Alan N. Simmons;Alan N. Simmons;Scott C. Matthews;Scott C. Matthews

  • Interoceptive sensitivity deficits in women recovered from bulimia nervosa.

    Megan Klabunde;Dean T. Acheson;Kerri N. Boutelle;Scott C. Matthews;Scott C. Matthews

  • Dissociation of inhibition from error processing using a parametric inhibitory task during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Scott C. Matthews;Alan N. Simmons;Estibaliz Arce;Martin P. Paulus

  • Demand-specific alteration of medial prefrontal cortex response during an inhibition task in recovered anorexic women.

    Tyson A. Oberndorfer;Walter H. Kaye;Alan N. Simmons;Alan N. Simmons;Irina A. Strigo

  • Increased amygdala activation is related to heart rate during emotion processing in adolescent subjects

    Tony T. Yang;Alan N. Simmons;Alan N. Simmons;Scott C. Matthews;Scott C. Matthews;Susan F. Tapert;Susan F. Tapert

  • Cortical and subcortical brain regions involved in rule-based category learning.

    J. Vincent Filoteo;CA W. Todd Maddox;Alan N. Simmons;A. David Ing

  • Depressive symptoms are associated with increased systemic vascular resistance to stress.

    Scott C. Matthews;Richard A. Nelesen;Joel E. Dimsdale

  • Increased affective bias revealed using experimental graded heat stimuli in young depressed adults: evidence of "emotional allodynia".

    Irina A Strigo;Alan N Simmons;Scott C Matthews;Arthur D Bud Craig

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan N. Simmons
Alan N. Simmons University of California, San Diego
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Irina A. Strigo
Irina A. Strigo University of California, San Francisco
Murray B. Stein
Murray B. Stein University of California, San Diego
Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
Joel E. Dimsdale
Joel E. Dimsdale University of California, San Diego
Dewleen G. Baker
Dewleen G. Baker University of California, San Diego
Deborah L. Harrington
Deborah L. Harrington Veterans Health Administration
Mingxiong Huang
Mingxiong Huang University of California, San Diego
Roland R. Lee
Roland R. Lee Veterans Health Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a wide range of academic and professional paths. If you’re interested in mental health and clinical practice, psyd online programs allow you to work toward a doctoral degree in psychology through flexible online study. For those who prefer counseling and family therapy, online mft programs offer a pathway to become a licensed marriage and family therapist, often in less time than traditional degrees.

Students eager to start their careers quickly may consider an online accelerated bachelor's degree, which can drastically shorten the time spent earning a diploma. Additionally, considering future earning potential is crucial—if salary is a top priority, reviewing the highest paying bachelor degrees entry-level can help guide your choices.

These online options provide flexibility while covering a spectrum of specializations and career goals in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Scott C. Matthews

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles