World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
14553
World Ranking
7893
National Ranking
3581

Ronald J. Prokopy publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald J. Prokopy sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 281 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ronald J. Prokopy D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald J. Prokopy sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald J. Prokopy was affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. They contributed to academic research during their career, with a focus directed toward their institutional association.

Details about Ronald J. Prokopy's scientific publications indicate that no recent papers with titles, years, or publication venues are available in the provided data. Similarly, there is no information on frequent co-authors or publication venues associated with their name.

Regarding academic disciplines, there are no specifically documented fields or subfields of study tied to their work in the available data set. Likewise, no main research topics have been recorded.

The record does not include any books published by Ronald J. Prokopy, nor are there any listed awards or recognitions with specified years or citations.

Because the scientist is deceased, the profile refers to their contributions in past tense.

Best Publications

  • ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS OF LEARNING IN PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS

    Daniel R. Papaj;Ronald J. Prokopy

  • Mating Behavior of Ceratitis capitata on a Field-Caged Host Tree

    Ronald J. Prokopy;Jorge Hendrichs

  • Evidence for a Marking Pheromone Deterring Repeated Oviposition in Apple Maggot Flies

    Ronald J. Prokopy

  • Bionomics and Management of Rhagoletis

    and E F Boller;R J Prokopy

  • Associative learning in egglaying site selection by apple maggot flies.

    Ronald J. Prokopy;Anne L. Averill;Sylvia S. Cooley;Carol A. Roitberg

  • JOINING AND AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR IN NONSOCIAL INSECTS

    Ronald J. Prokopy;Bernard D. Roitberg

  • Sex differences in movement between natural feeding and mating sites and tradeoffs between food consumption, mating success and predator evasion in Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae).

    J. Hendrichs;B. I. Katsoyannos;D. R. Papaj;R. J. Prokopy

  • Intraspecific Competition in the Tephritid Fruit Fly Rhagoletis Pomonella

    Anne L. Averill;Ronald J. Prokopy

  • Insects that Mark Host Plants

    Bernard D. Roitberg;Ronald J. Prokopy

  • Identification of a new blend of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot: Rhagoletis pomonella

    Aijun Zhang;Aijun Zhang;Charles Linn;Starker Wright;Ronald Prokopy

  • Effectiveness of GF-120 fruit fly bait spray applied to border area plants for control of melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)

    Ronald J. Prokopy;Neil W. Miller;Jaime C. Piñero;James D. Barry

  • Behavioral evidence for host races in Rhagoletis pomonella flies.

    Ronald J. Prokopy;Scott R. Diehl;Sylvia S. Cooley

  • Host odor and visual stimulus interaction during intratree host finding behavior of Rhagoletis pomonella flies

    Martin Aluja;Ronald J. Prokopy

  • Distribution and Activities of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) Flies on Host and Nonhost Trees

    Aldo Malavasi;Joao S. Morgante;Ronald J. Prokopy

  • MATING BEHAVIOR IN RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE): I. SITE OF ASSEMBLY

    Ronald J. Prokopy;Edward W. Bennett;Guy L. Bush

  • Attraction and feeding responses of Mediterranean fruit fly and a natural enemy to protein baits laced with two novel toxins, phloxine B and spinosada

    Roger I. Vargas;Neil W. Miller;Ronald J. Prokopy

  • Foraging Behaviour of Rhagoletis pomonella, a Parasite of Hawthorn (Crataegus viridis), in Nature

    Bernard D. Roitberg;Joop C. Van Lenteren;Jacques J. M. Van Alphen;Frietson Galis

  • VISUAL GENERALIST WITH VISUAL SPECIALIST PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS: HOST SELECTION BEHAVIOUR AND APPLICATION TO MANAGEMENT

    R. J. Prokopy;E. D. Owens

  • Deterrence of repeated oviposition by fruit-marking pheromone in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera:Tephritidae).

    Ronald J. Prokopy;James R. Ziegler;Tim T. Y. Wong

  • Foraging Behavior of True Fruit Flies

    Ronald J. Prokopy;Bernard D. Roitberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel R. Papaj
Daniel R. Papaj University of Arizona
Roger I. Vargas
Roger I. Vargas United States Department of Agriculture
Martin Aluja
Martin Aluja Instituto de Ecología
Guy L. Bush
Guy L. Bush Michigan State University
Bernard D. Roitberg
Bernard D. Roitberg Simon Fraser University
Robert R. Heath
Robert R. Heath Agricultural Research Service
Reuven Dukas
Reuven Dukas McMaster University
Eric B. Jang
Eric B. Jang Agricultural Research Service
James H. Tumlinson
James H. Tumlinson Pennsylvania State University
W. H. Reissig
W. H. Reissig Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse careers in the health and life sciences fields. Many students with this background pursue specialized programs online, tailoring their education to meet specific career goals or industry demands.

For example, those interested in the administrative side of healthcare might look into is medical billing and coding in demand to understand career options that blend science with healthcare technology. Similarly, a bachelor's degree health information management can prepare graduates for roles managing patient data and health records.

Nutrition is another popular pathway—consider the cheapest online master's in nutrition for those focused on dietetics or wellness. For students interested in diagnostics and imaging, ultrasound tech certification online offers a hands-on approach direct to clinical settings.

With convenient and flexible online degrees, students can enhance their Biology and Biochemistry backgrounds and confidently pursue careers in healthcare management, diagnostics, nutrition, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald J. Prokopy

Recently Published Articles