World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rebecca Adler-Nissen

Rebecca Adler-Nissen

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
30
Citations
4160
World Ranking
1178
National Ranking
24

Rebecca Adler-Nissen publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Adler-Nissen sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 76 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Rebecca Adler-Nissen D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Adler-Nissen sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society

    Unknown

  • Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya

    Rebecca Adler-Nissen;Vincent Pouliot

  • Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents

    Unknown

  • Opting Out of the European Union

    Unknown

  • Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies: The Everyday of European Integration

    Unknown

  • Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations

    Unknown

  • Bourdieu in International Relations

    Unknown

  • Images, emotions, and international politics: the death of Alan Kurdi

    Unknown

  • Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics

    Unknown

  • State, media and civil society in the information warfare over Ukraine: citizen curators of digital disinformation

    Unknown

  • Performing Brexit: How a post-Brexit world is imagined outside the United Kingdom

    Rebecca Adler-Nissen;Charlotte Galpin;Charlotte Galpin;Ben Rosamond

  • Opting out of the European Union: diplomacy, sovereignty and European integration

    Unknown

  • Symbolic power in European diplomacy: the struggle between national foreign services and the EU's External Action Service

    Unknown

  • Sovereignty games : instrumentalizing state sovereignty in Europe and beyond

    Rebecca Adler-Nissen;Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen

  • The Diplomacy of Opting Out: A Bourdieudian Approach to National Integration Strategies*

    Unknown

  • Picking and Choosing the ‘Sovereign’ Border: A Theory of Changing State Bordering Practices

    Unknown

  • Conclusion: Relationalism or why diplomats find international relations theory strange

    Unknown

  • Behind the scenes of differentiated integration: circumventing national opt-outs in Justice and Home Affairs

    Unknown

  • European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games

    Unknown

  • Blended Diplomacy: The Entanglement and Contestation of Digital Technologies in Everyday Diplomatic Practice

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles