World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 49 14926 13445 24 24 288 7746

Piotr Tomasik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Piotr Tomasik between 1970 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Piotr Tomasik published across 55 years, from 1970 to 2024, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2003. 8 of the 310 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2003. 1970: 6 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 1 publication
1970 2024

310 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Piotr Tomasik: publications per year, 1970 to 2024
Year Publications
1970 6
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 5
1976 2
1977 1
1978 3
1979 3
1980 0
1981 3
1982 1
1983 4
1984 1
1985 4
1986 6
1987 2
1988 1
1989 5
1990 4
1991 7
1992 2
1993 4
1994 4
1995 9
1996 5
1997 13
1998 9
1999 12
2000 19
2001 16
2002 15
2003 20
2004 12
2005 8
2006 6
2007 7
2008 12
2009 5
2010 10
2011 4
2012 4
2013 6
2014 3
2015 5
2016 3
2017 5
2018 2
2019 3
2020 13
2021 2
2022 6
2023 7
2024 1
Total 310
Download as CSV

Piotr Tomasik publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Tomasik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 288 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939 288
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Piotr Tomasik D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Tomasik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835 49
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Piotr Tomasik is affiliated with the University of Agriculture Faisalabad in Pakistan and has a research profile strongly oriented towards the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans various subfields including Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biophysics, Food Science, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The research topics covered by Tomasik include Plasma Applications and Diagnostics, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects, Chemical and Physical Studies, Biofield Effects and Biophysics, Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects, Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics, and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena.

Among recent scholarly contributions are:

  • Probiotics, Non-Dairy Prebiotics and Postbiotics in Nutrition, 2020, Applied Sciences
  • Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Water Treated under Nitrogen with Low-Temperature Glow Plasma, 2020, Water
  • Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Water Treated under Carbon Dioxide with Low-Temperature Low-Pressure Glow Plasma of Low Frequency, 2020, Water
  • A Facile and Efficient Bromination of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes, 2021, Materials
  • Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Water Treated under Methane with Low-Temperature Glow Plasma of Low Frequency, 2020, Water

Tomasik frequently collaborates with a group of researchers including Wojciech Ciesielski, Zdzisław Oszczęda, Jacek A. Soroka, Damian Kulawik, and Tomasz Girek.

Their publications appear predominantly in journals such as Water, BIORISK - Biodiversity and Ecosystem Risk Assessment, HERBALISM, Applied Sciences, and Materials. The highest number of publications are in Water and BIORISK, reflecting a recurring focus on environmental and ecosystem-related studies alongside applied sciences.

Best Publications

  • Chemical modification of starch.

    Piotr Tomasik;Christopher H. Schilling

  • Probiotics and Prebiotics

    Przemyslaw Jan Tomasik;Piotr Tomasik

  • Chemical and functional properties of food saccharides

    Piotr Tomasik

  • Dipyrazolopyridine derivatives as bright blue electroluminescent materials

    Y. T. Tao;E. Balasubramaniam;A. Danel;P. Tomasik

  • Rheological and sensory properties of dessert sauces thickened by starch–xanthan gum combinations

    Marek Sikora;Stanisław Kowalski;Piotr Tomasik;Marek Sady

  • Sharp green electroluminescence from 1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]quinoline-based light-emitting diodes

    Y. T. Tao;E. Balasubramaniam;A. Danel;B. Jarosz

  • The Thermal Decomposition of Carbohydrates. Part I. The Decomposition of Mono-, Di-, and Oligo-Saccharides

    Piotr Tomasik

  • Complexes of Starch with Inorganic Guests

    Piotr Tomasik;Christopher H. Schilling

  • Interactions of starch with salts of metals from the transition groups

    Wojciech Ciesielski;Cheng-yi Lii;Ming-Tsung Yen;Piotr Tomasik

  • The Thermal Decomposition of Carbohydrates. Part II.* The Decomposition of Starch

    Piotr Tomasik

  • Enzymatic conversions of starch.

    Piotr Tomasik;Derek Horton

  • Nonconventional methods of modification of starch.

    Piotr Tomasik;Mark F. Zaranyika

  • Binary hydrocolloids from starches and xanthan gum

    Marek Sikora;Stanisław Kowalski;Piotr Tomasik

  • Xanthan gum–gelatin complexes

    C.-y. Lii;S.C. Liaw;V.M.-F. Lai;P. Tomasik;P. Tomasik

  • Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Variously Substituted Pyrazoloquinolines as Emitting Material

    Y. T. Tao and;E. Balasubramaniam;A. Danel;and B. Jarosz

  • Deep-freezing of potato starch.

    Joanna Szymońska;Franciszek Krok;Piotr Tomasik

  • Apple pectin complexes with whey protein isolate

    H Zaleska;S.G Ring;P Tomasik

  • Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on 2-(Stilben-4-yl)benzoxazole Derivatives: An Implication on the Emission Mechanism

    Chung-Wen Ko;Yu-Tai Tao;Andrzej Danel;Lidia Krzeminska

  • Behaviour of granular starches in low-pressure glow plasma

    Cheng-yi Lii;Chia-ding Liao;Leszek Stobinski;Piotr Tomasik

  • Effects of hydrogen, oxygen, and ammonia low-pressure glow plasma on granular starches

    Cheng-yi Lii;Cheng-yi Lii;Chia-ding Liao;Leszek Stobinski;Piotr Tomasik

  • Blue electroluminescence of novel pyrazoloquinoline and bispyrazolopyridine derivatives in doped polymer matrices

    Z. He;G. H. W. Milburn;A. Danel;A. Puchala

  • Interactions of potato starch with selected polysaccharide hydrocolloids as measured by low-field NMR

    Hanna M. Baranowska;M. Sikora;S. Kowalski;P. Tomasik

Frequent Co-Authors

Yu-Tai Tao
Yu-Tai Tao Academia Sinica
Ya-Jane Wang
Ya-Jane Wang University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Jay-lin Jane
Jay-lin Jane Iowa State University
Ryszard Jankowiak
Ryszard Jankowiak Kansas State University
Gerald J. Small
Gerald J. Small Iowa State University
Krzysztof J. Kurzydłowski
Krzysztof J. Kurzydłowski Bialystok University of Technology
Derek Horton
Derek Horton The Ohio State University
Alicja Bachmatiuk
Alicja Bachmatiuk Wrocław University of Science and Technology
SangGuan You
SangGuan You Gangneung–Wonju National University
Seung Taik Lim
Seung Taik Lim Korea University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various specialized fields, especially within forensic science. For those interested in hands-on roles, becoming a forensic autopsy technician is a promising career path. This role involves assisting medical examiners by applying chemical knowledge to analyze biological samples.

For students looking for affordable education options, there are programs listed among the cheapest online forensic science degree offerings. These programs allow learners to study vital forensic principles, including chemical analysis techniques, without breaking the bank.

Some career paths require advanced education. Online forensic psychology graduate programs online provide an intersection between chemistry, psychology, and the law, preparing graduates for roles that demand a deeper understanding of criminal behavior alongside scientific methods.

Overall, exploring various forensic careers can help chemistry students identify pathways that match their interests and skills, highlighting the diverse opportunities available in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Piotr Tomasik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles