World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
16903
World Ranking
12337
National Ranking
425

Peter McCourt publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter McCourt sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 111 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter McCourt D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter McCourt sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter McCourt is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and specializes in research within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work primarily focuses on plant science, encompassing topics such as plant parasitism and resistance, molecular biology, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

Their research covers a range of main topics including:

  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis

Peter McCourt has published several papers in prominent journals. Selected recent publications include:

  • Activation tagging identifies Arabidopsis transcription factor AtMYB68 for heat and drought tolerance at yield determining reproductive stages, 2020, The Plant Journal
  • Three mutations repurpose a plant karrikin receptor to a strigolactone receptor, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Plant hormone signaling: Is upside down right side up?, 2021, Current Opinion in Plant Biology
  • A novel strigolactone receptor antagonist provides insights into the structural inhibition, conditioning, and germination of the crop parasite Striga, 2022, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Structural analysis of a hormone-bound Striga strigolactone receptor, 2023, Nature Plants

Their frequent co-authors include Shelley Lumba, Christopher S. P. McErlean, Amir Arellano-Saab, Michael Bunsick, and P.J. Stogios.

Peter McCourt's publications have appeared in well-regarded venues such as The Plant Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Cell, Current Opinion in Plant Biology, and Nature Plants.

Best Publications

  • Abscisic Acid Inhibits Type 2C Protein Phosphatases via the PYR/PYL Family of START Proteins

    Sang-Youl Park;Pauline Fung;Noriyuki Nishimura;Davin R. Jensen

  • Regulation of Abscisic Acid Signaling by the Ethylene Response Pathway in Arabidopsis

    Majid Ghassemian;Eiji Nambara;Sean Cutler;Hiroshi Kawaide

  • A Role for Brassinosteroids in Germination in Arabidopsis

    Camille M. Steber;Peter McCourt

  • A Protein Farnesyl Transferase Involved in Abscisic Acid Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis

    Sean Cutler;Majid Ghassemian;Dario Bonetta;Sarah Cooney

  • Role of Farnesyltransferase in ABA Regulation of Guard Cell Anion Channels and Plant Water Loss

    Zhen-Ming Pei;Majid Ghassemian;Christine M. Kwak;Peter McCourt

  • Fatty acid composition of leaf lipids determined after combined digestion and fatty acid methyl ester formation from fresh tissue

    John Browse;Peter J. McCourt;Christopher R. Somerville

  • The Transcription Factor FUSCA3 Controls Developmental Timing in Arabidopsis through the Hormones Gibberellin and Abscisic Acid

    Sonia Gazzarrini;Yuichiro Tsuchiya;Shelley Lumba;Masanori Okamoto

  • The ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3 (ABI3) gene is modulated by farnesylation and is involved in auxin signaling and lateral root development in Arabidopsis.

    Siobhan Mary Brady;Sara F. Sarkar;Dario Bonetta;Peter McCourt

  • Next‐generation mapping of Arabidopsis genes

    Ryan S. Austin;Danielle Vidaurre;George Stamatiou;Robert Breit

  • Genetic interactions between ABA, ethylene and sugar signaling pathways.

    Sonia Gazzarrini;Peter McCourt

  • Catalase Is Encoded by a Multigene Family in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh

    J. A. Frugoli;Hai Hong Zhong;M. L. Nuccio;P. Mccourt

  • A small-molecule screen in C. elegans yields a new calcium channel antagonist

    Trevor C. Y. Kwok;Nicole Ricker;Regina Fraser;Allen W. Chan

  • fusca3: A Heterochronic Mutation Affecting Late Embryo Development in Arabidopsis.

    Kallie Keith;Marlene Kraml;Nancy G. Dengler;Peter McCourt

  • Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection.

    Yang Wang;Jifeng Ying;Monika Kuzma;Maryse Chalifoux

  • Isolation of the GA-Response Mutant sly1 as a Suppressor of ABI1-1 in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Camille M. Steber;Sarah E. Cooney;Peter McCourt

  • Structure-function analysis identifies highly sensitive strigolactone receptors in Striga.

    Shigeo Toh;Duncan Holbrook-Smith;Peter J. Stogios;Olena Onopriyenko

  • A mutant of Arabidopsis which is defective in seed development and storage protein accumulation is a new abi3 allele

    Eiji Nambara;Satoshi Naito;Peter McCourt;Peter McCourt

  • Cross-talk in plant hormone signalling: what Arabidopsis mutants are telling us.

    Sonia Gazzarrini;Peter Mccourt

  • Probing strigolactone receptors in Striga hermonthica with fluorescence

    Yuichiro Tsuchiya;Yuichiro Tsuchiya;Masahiko Yoshimura;Yoshikatsu Sato;Keiko Kuwata

  • A small-molecule screen identifies new functions for the plant hormone strigolactone

    Yuichiro Tsuchiya;Danielle Vidaurre;Shigeo Toh;Atsushi Hanada

Frequent Co-Authors

Sean R. Cutler
Sean R. Cutler University of California, Riverside
Chris Somerville
Chris Somerville University of California, Berkeley
John Browse
John Browse Washington State University
Eiji Nambara
Eiji Nambara University of Toronto
Nicholas J. Provart
Nicholas J. Provart University of Toronto
Satoshi Naito
Satoshi Naito Hokkaido University
Tadao Asami
Tadao Asami University of Tokyo
Siobhan M. Brady
Siobhan M. Brady University of California, Davis
Toshinori Kinoshita
Toshinori Kinoshita Nagoya University
Shinjiro Yamaguchi
Shinjiro Yamaguchi Kyoto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to various career pathways, including opportunities in healthcare management, medical coding, and billing. For those interested in leadership roles within healthcare organizations, pursuing a cheap online mba healthcare administration can provide valuable business skills and significantly improve job prospects.

Another popular path is to become a medical coder or biller, where professionals work with patient records and insurance claims. Prospective students are often curious about salaries in this field. Understanding the difference in ccs vs cpc salary is crucial—different certifications can impact earning potential and job opportunities.

Those wondering, how much does a medical coder make will find that pay varies by region, experience, and certification. Overall, the medical billing and coding outlook is positive, thanks to growing demand for healthcare services and insurance processing. Whichever path you choose, a strong foundation in biology and biochemistry can provide many exciting and accessible career options in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Peter McCourt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles