World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
5984
World Ranking
5117
National Ranking
367

Peter Hiscock publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hiscock sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 177 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Peter Hiscock D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hiscock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Archaeology of Ancient Australia

    Peter Hiscock

  • Archaeological assessment reveals Earth’s early transformation through land use

    Lucas Stephens;Dorian Fuller;Nicole Boivin;Torben Rick

  • Technological responses to risk in Holocene Australia

    Peter Hiscock

  • Learning in Lithic Landscapes: A Reconsideration of the Hominid “Toolmaking” Niche

    Peter Hiscock

  • Quantifying the size of artefact assemblages

    Peter Hiscock

  • The need for a taphonomic perspective in stone artefact analysis

    Peter Hiscock

  • Pattern and Context in the Holocene Proliferation of Backed Artifacts in Australia

    Peter Hiscock

  • Thesis Abstract: Prehistoric Settlement Patterns and Artefact Manufacture at Lawn Hill, Northwest Queensland

    Peter Dixon Hiscock

  • Early Australian implement variation: a reduction model

    Peter Hiscock;Val Attenbrow

  • Prehistoric settlement patterns and artefact manufacture at Lawn Hill, Northwest Queensland

    Peter Dixon Hiscock

  • Blunt and to the Point: Changing Technological Strategies in Holocene Australia

    Peter Hiscock

  • Are Tulas and ENSO Linked in Australia

    Peter Veth;Peter Hiscock;Alan Williams

  • Desert peoples : archaeological perspectives

    Peter Marius Veth;Mike Smith;Peter Hiscock

  • Experimental evaluation of Kuhn's geometric index of reduction and the flat-flake problem

    Peter Hiscock;Christoper J Clarkson

  • Early Holocene backed artefacts from Australia

    Peter Hiscock;Val Attenbrow

  • Big debates over little tools: ongoing disputes over microliths on three continents

    Peter Hiscock;Christopher J Clarkson;Alexander Mackay

  • Technological change in the Hunter River Valley and the interpretation of Late Holocene change in Australia

    Peter Hiscock

  • Multiple uses for Australian backed artefacts

    Gail Robertson;Val Attenbrow;Peter Hiscock

  • Bondaian Technology in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales

    Peter Hiscock

  • Change in the Australian desert culture: A reanalysis of tulas from Puntutjarpa rocksheiter

    Peter Hiscock;Peter Veth

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Bellwood
Peter Bellwood Australian National University
Kim Sterelny
Kim Sterelny Australian National University
Kathryn E. Fitzsimmons
Kathryn E. Fitzsimmons Max Planck Society
Geraldine Jacobsen
Geraldine Jacobsen Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
Jed O. Kaplan
Jed O. Kaplan University of Calgary
Marie-José Gaillard
Marie-José Gaillard Linnaeus University
Kees Klein Goldewijk
Kees Klein Goldewijk Utrecht University
Jon M. Erlandson
Jon M. Erlandson University of Oregon
Torben C. Rick
Torben C. Rick National Museum of Natural History
Gilberto Artioli
Gilberto Artioli University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Hiscock

Recently Published Articles