World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
4367
World Ranking
2878
National Ranking
991

Paul Ziehl publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Ziehl sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 190 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Paul Ziehl D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Ziehl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Energy and CO2 emission assessments of alkali-activated concrete and Ordinary Portland Cement concrete: A comparative analysis of different grades of concrete

    Unknown

  • Prediction of fatigue crack growth in steel bridge components using acoustic emission

    Unknown

  • Effect of source and particle size distribution on the mechanical and microstructural properties of fly Ash-Based geopolymer concrete

    Unknown

  • Investigation of early compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete

    Unknown

  • Acoustic emission monitoring for assessment of prestressed concrete beams

    Mohamed K. ElBatanouny;Paul H. Ziehl;Aaron Larosche;Jesé Mangual

  • Automated crack detection and crack depth prediction for reinforced concrete structures using deep learning

    Unknown

  • Improvement of the early and final compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at ambient conditions

    Unknown

  • Acoustic emission based damage assessment method for prestressed concrete structures: Modified index of damage

    Unknown

  • Identification of Cracking Mechanisms in Scaled FRP Reinforced Concrete Beams using Acoustic Emission

    Unknown

  • Enhanced Discriminate Feature Learning Deep Residual CNN for Multitask Bearing Fault Diagnosis With Information Fusion

    Unknown

  • Early Corrosion Detection in Prestressed Concrete Girders Using Acoustic Emission

    Unknown

  • Classification of alkali–silica reaction damage using acoustic emission: A proof-of-concept study

    Unknown

  • Using sucrose for improvement of initial and final setting times of silica fume-based activating solution of fly ash geopolymer concrete

    Unknown

  • Corrosion Damage Quantification of Prestressing Strands Using Acoustic Emission

    Unknown

  • Bayesian model updating and prognosis of fatigue crack growth

    Unknown

  • Acoustic emission monitoring of early corrosion in prestressed concrete piles

    Unknown

  • Detection of impact on aircraft composite structure using machine learning techniques

    Unknown

  • Design and Field Evaluation of Hybrid FRP/Reinforced Concrete Superstructure System

    Paul H. Ziehl;Michael D. Engelhardt;Timothy J. Fowler;Fernando V. Ulloa

  • Applications of acoustic emission evaluation for civil infrastructure

    Unknown

  • Developing a heterogeneous ensemble learning framework to evaluate Alkali-silica reaction damage in concrete using acoustic emission signals

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor Giurgiutiu
Victor Giurgiutiu University of South Carolina
Antonio Nanni
Antonio Nanni University of Miami
Daniel J. Inman
Daniel J. Inman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Shashank Priya
Shashank Priya Pennsylvania State University
Simon Laflamme
Simon Laflamme Iowa State University
William J. Collins
William J. Collins University of Reading
Michael A. Sutton
Michael A. Sutton University of South Carolina
Zafer Gürdal
Zafer Gürdal University of South Carolina
Yeomin Yoon
Yeomin Yoon Ewha Womans University
Philip K. Hopke
Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offers flexibility and diverse career options. Many students consider these programs to enhance their expertise or pivot into specialized fields. Understanding how competitive programs are is crucial, as admissions can vary widely in difficulty. For insight into acceptance rates and application challenges, see how hard is it to get into speech pathology grad school.

For those seeking more accessible entry points, evaluating the easiest audiology programs to get into can provide a useful benchmark when comparing other STEM fields. While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering programs may differ in entry requirements, insights from these rankings help shape realistic expectations.

Cost is always a consideration with any degree, including online options. Tuition and fees can vary based on the institution and program length. To better understand typical expenses and budgeting, reviewing information on speech pathology online program cost offers a helpful perspective on managing educational investments.

Additionally, veterans looking to advance their careers can benefit from tailored online programs. Online speech pathology degrees for veterans highlight the support and resources available to service members, which is also relevant for veterans pursuing engineering-related disciplines. Such programs often provide flexible scheduling, making them an ideal choice for those balancing multiple commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Ziehl

Recently Published Articles