World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 65 388 208 132 18457
Computer Science 65 2441 1223 126 18361

Paul Tseng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Tseng between 1985 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Tseng published across 32 years, from 1985 to 2016, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2000. 1 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2000. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
1985 2016

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Tseng: publications per year, 1985 to 2016
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 3
1988 3
1989 2
1990 7
1991 9
1992 8
1993 7
1994 3
1995 4
1996 6
1997 5
1998 5
1999 3
2000 10
2001 4
2002 10
2003 6
2004 6
2005 1
2006 2
2007 7
2008 3
2009 3
2010 5
2011 5
2012 1
2013 2
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
Total 133
Download as CSV

Paul Tseng publications per year - data summary

  • Paul Tseng, a Mathematics scholar from University of Washington, has 133 publications recorded across 32 years, from 1985 to 2016.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1985 and the most recent to 2016.
  • The most productive years are 2000 and 2002, with 10 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1985, 2005, 2012, 2014 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 32 years in the span carry no publications at all (1986 and 2015).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.4 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2012-2016) hold 5 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1985-1995: 47 publications (4.3 per year); 1996-2006: 58 publications (5.3 per year); 2007-2016: 28 publications (2.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Paul Tseng publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Tseng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 132–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 132 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110 132
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Tseng publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 42–46 to 537+ publications.
  • Paul Tseng, a Mathematics scholar from University of Washington, records 132 publications - the 28th percentile of the discipline.
  • 28% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Paul Tseng, and about 72% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 172–176 publications range, and Paul Tseng ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–146 publications, holding 112 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 47% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 537 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Paul Tseng D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Tseng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27 65
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Paul Tseng D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 57 ranges running from 30 to 86+ D-Index.
  • Paul Tseng, a Mathematics scholar from University of Washington, records 65 D-Index - the 90th percentile of the discipline.
  • 90% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Paul Tseng, and about 10% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Paul Tseng ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 30 D-Index, holding 174 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Paul Tseng was affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States during their academic career. They contributed to the scientific community primarily through their research and academic activities associated with this institution.

Details on their specific fields of study, research topics, and areas of expertise have not been provided. The absence of recorded publications, co-authors, or frequent publication venues limits the scope of available data on their research output.

There is no information on recent papers or significant publications authored by Paul Tseng. Consequently, no analysis of their research topics or thematic contributions can be derived from publication records.

Likewise, details on co-authors and frequent collaborators are not available, indicating either limited documentation or a focus on independent research work.

No book publications or involvement in publishing with specific academic publishers have been recorded for Paul Tseng.

Information regarding awards or distinctions earned by Paul Tseng is also absent, which provides no insight into recognitions during their career.

Given that Paul Tseng is deceased, this profile reflects on the known data from prior to their passing rather than ongoing work or current affiliations.

Best Publications

  • Convergence of a block coordinate descent method for nondifferentiable minimization

    P. Tseng

  • A Modified Forward-Backward Splitting Method for Maximal Monotone Mappings

    Paul Tseng

  • A coordinate gradient descent method for nonsmooth separable minimization

    Paul Tseng;Sangwoon Yun

  • Applications of splitting algorithm to decomposition in convex programming and variational inequalities

    Paul Tseng

  • On the convergence of the coordinate descent method for convex differentiable minimization

    Z. Q. Luo;P. Tseng

  • Hankel Matrix Rank Minimization with Applications to System Identification and Realization

    Maryam Fazel;Ting Kei Pong;Defeng Sun;Paul Tseng

  • Error bounds and convergence analysis of feasible descent methods: a general approach

    Zhi Quan Luo;Paul Tseng

  • Smoothing Functions for Second-Order-Cone Complementarity Problems

    Masao Fukushima;Zhi-Quan Luo;Paul Tseng

  • Modified Projection-Type Methods for Monotone Variational Inequalities

    Michael V. Solodov;Paul Tseng

  • Approximation accuracy, gradient methods, and error bound for structured convex optimization

    Paul Tseng

  • Robust wavelet denoising

    S. Sardy;P. Tseng;A. Bruce

  • Second-Order Cone Programming Relaxation of Sensor Network Localization

    Paul Tseng

  • Block Coordinate Relaxation Methods for Nonparametric Wavelet Denoising

    Sylvain Sardy;Andrew G. Bruce;Paul Tseng

  • On the linear convergence of descent methods for convex essentially smooth minimization

    Zhi-Quan Luo;Paul Tseng

  • Nearest q -flat to m points

    P. Tseng

  • Approximation Bounds for Quadratic Optimization with Homogeneous Quadratic Constraints

    Zhi-Quan Luo;Nicholas D. Sidiropoulos;Paul Tseng;Shuzhong Zhang

  • Relaxation methods for minimum cost ordinary and generalized network flow problems

    Dimitri P. Bertsekas;Paul Tseng

  • An Incremental Gradient(-Projection) Method with Momentum Term and Adaptive Stepsize Rule

    Paul Tseng

  • On linear convergence of iterative methods for the variational inequality problem

    Paul Tseng

  • On the convergence of the exponential multiplier method for convex programming

    Paul Tseng;Dimitri P. Bertsekas

  • Trace Norm Regularization: Reformulations, Algorithms, and Multi-Task Learning

    Ting Kei Pong;Paul Tseng;Shuiwang Ji;Jieping Ye

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhi-Quan Luo
Zhi-Quan Luo Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Dimitri P. Bertsekas
Dimitri P. Bertsekas Arizona State University
Masao Fukushima
Masao Fukushima Kyoto University
James V. Burke
James V. Burke University of Washington
Yinyu Ye
Yinyu Ye Stanford University
Jonathan M. Borwein
Jonathan M. Borwein University of Newcastle Australia
Heinz H. Bauschke
Heinz H. Bauschke University of British Columbia
Mihai Anitescu
Mihai Anitescu Argonne National Laboratory
Francis Tin-Loi
Francis Tin-Loi University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, expanding career options often includes exploring complementary online degrees. Many professionals enhance their analytical skills by enrolling in programs like a masters in data analytics, which leverages mathematical foundations to interpret complex data sets for decision-making roles.

Additionally, those interested in leadership and management often consider online MBA programs. Finding a flexible program can be simplified by researching options such as an online mba with transfer credits accepted, allowing students to maximize previous coursework and save time.

For prospective MBA candidates worried about admissions, identifying the easiest mba program to get into can provide a strategic entry point into business education. These programs often feature more accessible requirements while maintaining quality education.

Similarly, those seeking quick and convenient study options can look into the easy online mba programs, which offer streamlined curricula tailored for busy professionals.

Overall, blending mathematics expertise with interdisciplinary online degrees enhances career prospects in tech, finance, management, and analytics fields.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Tseng

Recently Published Articles