World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
35
Citations
3279
World Ranking
2754
National Ranking
6

Ole Øiseth publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Øiseth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 191 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Ole Øiseth D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Øiseth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Long-term monitoring of wind field characteristics and dynamic response of a long-span suspension bridge in complex terrain

    Unknown

  • Engineering Analysis and Design with ALE-VMS and Space–Time Methods

    Kenji Takizawa;Yuri Bazilevs;Tayfun E. Tezduyar;Ming Chen Hsu

  • A data-based structural health monitoring approach for damage detection in steel bridges using experimental data

    Unknown

  • Strong wind characteristics and dynamic response of a long-span suspension bridge during a storm

    Unknown

  • Simplified prediction of wind-induced response and stability limit of slender long-span suspension bridges, based on modified quasi-steady theory: A case study

    Unknown

  • Aerodynamic damping models for vortex-induced vibration of a rectangular 4:1 cylinder: Comparison of modeling schemes

    Unknown

  • Wind deflection analysis of railway catenary under crosswind based on nonlinear finite element model and wind tunnel test

    Unknown

  • Sensitivity-based finite element model updating of a pontoon bridge

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of mast measurements and wind tunnel terrain models to describe spatially variable wind field characteristics for long-span bridge design

    Unknown

  • A hybrid structural health monitoring approach for damage detection in steel bridges under simulated environmental conditions using numerical and experimental data

    Unknown

  • Operational modal analysis of an end-supported pontoon bridge

    Unknown

  • An enhanced forced vibration rig for wind tunnel testing of bridge deck section models in arbitrary motion

    Unknown

  • Measured Buffeting Response of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge Compared with Numerical Predictions Based on Design Wind Spectra

    Unknown

  • A comparative study of wind-induced dynamic response models of long-span bridges using artificial neural networks, support vector regression and buffeting theory

    Unknown

  • Influence line extraction by deconvolution in the frequency domain

    Unknown

  • Modelling the stochastic dynamic behaviour of a pontoon bridge

    Unknown

  • Prediction of long-term extreme load effects due to wave and wind actions for cable-supported bridges with floating pylons

    Yuwang Xu;Ole Øiseth;Torgeir Moan;Arvid Naess

  • Data Set from Long-Term Wind and Acceleration Monitoring of the Hardanger Bridge

    Unknown

  • Buffeting response of long-span bridges considering uncertain turbulence parameters using the environmental contour method

    Unknown

  • Site-specific data-driven probabilistic wind field modeling for the wind-induced response prediction of cable-supported bridges

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Yuri Bazilevs
Yuri Bazilevs Brown University
Torgeir Moan
Torgeir Moan Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Tayfun E. Tezduyar
Tayfun E. Tezduyar Rice University
Kenji Takizawa
Kenji Takizawa Waseda University
Ming-Chen Hsu
Ming-Chen Hsu Iowa State University
Allan Larsen
Allan Larsen Cowi (Denmark)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to diverse career paths, including fields related to technical analysis, design, and innovation. For students seeking flexible learning options, exploring speech pathology online program cost details can offer insights into managing education expenses through online platforms, which is valuable in budgeting for any technical degree.

Military veterans often find it crucial to identify programs tailored to their specific needs. Checking out military friendly online speech pathology degree programs highlights available support and resources that can also guide veterans transitioning into engineering or aerospace fields.

Time efficiency matters for many students, especially those balancing work or other commitments. Reviewing options like 5 year accelerated speech pathology programs offers a perspective on accelerated learning paths that could inspire similar strategies in engineering education.

For those interested in combining engineering knowledge with analytical skills in law enforcement or intelligence, understanding pathways to roles such as an profiler job can broaden career opportunities beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Ole Øiseth

Recently Published Articles