World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2754 2585 6 6 191 3279

Ole Øiseth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ole Øiseth between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ole Øiseth published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2023. 31 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2023. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 10 publications
2010 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ole Øiseth: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 4
2012 1
2013 1
2014 5
2015 7
2016 11
2017 24
2018 19
2019 17
2020 11
2021 21
2022 26
2023 28
2024 21
2025 10
Total 207
Download as CSV

Ole Øiseth publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Øiseth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 191 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140 191
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Ole Øiseth D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Øiseth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Long-term monitoring of wind field characteristics and dynamic response of a long-span suspension bridge in complex terrain

    Unknown

  • Engineering Analysis and Design with ALE-VMS and Space–Time Methods

    Kenji Takizawa;Yuri Bazilevs;Tayfun E. Tezduyar;Ming Chen Hsu

  • A data-based structural health monitoring approach for damage detection in steel bridges using experimental data

    Unknown

  • Strong wind characteristics and dynamic response of a long-span suspension bridge during a storm

    Unknown

  • Simplified prediction of wind-induced response and stability limit of slender long-span suspension bridges, based on modified quasi-steady theory: A case study

    Unknown

  • Aerodynamic damping models for vortex-induced vibration of a rectangular 4:1 cylinder: Comparison of modeling schemes

    Unknown

  • Wind deflection analysis of railway catenary under crosswind based on nonlinear finite element model and wind tunnel test

    Unknown

  • Sensitivity-based finite element model updating of a pontoon bridge

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of mast measurements and wind tunnel terrain models to describe spatially variable wind field characteristics for long-span bridge design

    Unknown

  • A hybrid structural health monitoring approach for damage detection in steel bridges under simulated environmental conditions using numerical and experimental data

    Unknown

  • Operational modal analysis of an end-supported pontoon bridge

    Unknown

  • An enhanced forced vibration rig for wind tunnel testing of bridge deck section models in arbitrary motion

    Unknown

  • Measured Buffeting Response of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge Compared with Numerical Predictions Based on Design Wind Spectra

    Unknown

  • A comparative study of wind-induced dynamic response models of long-span bridges using artificial neural networks, support vector regression and buffeting theory

    Unknown

  • Influence line extraction by deconvolution in the frequency domain

    Unknown

  • Modelling the stochastic dynamic behaviour of a pontoon bridge

    Unknown

  • Prediction of long-term extreme load effects due to wave and wind actions for cable-supported bridges with floating pylons

    Yuwang Xu;Ole Øiseth;Torgeir Moan;Arvid Naess

  • Data Set from Long-Term Wind and Acceleration Monitoring of the Hardanger Bridge

    Unknown

  • Buffeting response of long-span bridges considering uncertain turbulence parameters using the environmental contour method

    Unknown

  • Site-specific data-driven probabilistic wind field modeling for the wind-induced response prediction of cable-supported bridges

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Yuri Bazilevs
Yuri Bazilevs Brown University
Torgeir Moan
Torgeir Moan Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Tayfun E. Tezduyar
Tayfun E. Tezduyar Rice University
Kenji Takizawa
Kenji Takizawa Waseda University
Ming-Chen Hsu
Ming-Chen Hsu Iowa State University
Allan Larsen
Allan Larsen Cowi (Denmark)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to diverse career paths, including fields related to technical analysis, design, and innovation. For students seeking flexible learning options, exploring speech pathology online program cost details can offer insights into managing education expenses through online platforms, which is valuable in budgeting for any technical degree.

Military veterans often find it crucial to identify programs tailored to their specific needs. Checking out military friendly online speech pathology degree programs highlights available support and resources that can also guide veterans transitioning into engineering or aerospace fields.

Time efficiency matters for many students, especially those balancing work or other commitments. Reviewing options like 5 year accelerated speech pathology programs offers a perspective on accelerated learning paths that could inspire similar strategies in engineering education.

For those interested in combining engineering knowledge with analytical skills in law enforcement or intelligence, understanding pathways to roles such as an profiler job can broaden career opportunities beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Ole Øiseth

Recently Published Articles