World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
4292
World Ranking
7198
National Ranking
2425

Michelle R. Gaither publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle R. Gaither sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 71 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michelle R. Gaither D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle R. Gaither sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michelle R. Gaither is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant emphasis on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broad fields, their work spans ecology, molecular biology, genetics, nature and landscape conservation, and aquatic science.

The main topics of Gaither's research include environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, identification and quantification in food, microbial community ecology and physiology, genetic diversity and population structure, genomics and phylogenetic studies, coral and marine ecosystem studies, as well as research data management practices.

Gaither has contributed extensively to scientific literature, with recent publications that cover diverse aspects of environmental DNA and genomic data management. Some of their recent papers are:

  • One size does not fit all: Tuning eDNA protocols for high- and low-turbidity water sampling, 2021, Environmental DNA
  • Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary, 2022, PLoS ONE
  • Poor data stewardship will hinder global genetic diversity surveillance, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Building a global genomics observatory: Using GEOME (the Genomic Observatories Metadatabase) to expedite and improve deposition and retrieval of genetic data and metadata for biodiversity research, 2020, Molecular Ecology Resources
  • Marine environmental DNA: Approaches, applications, and opportunities, 2020, Advances in marine biology

Gaither frequently publishes in various academic venues, with multiple papers appearing in Environmental DNA and Ecology and Evolution, as well as contributions to PLoS ONE, PeerJ, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Collaboration plays a key role in Gaither's research activities. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Toonen, Emily Farrell, Eric D. Crandall, Samuel Greaves, and Girish Kumar.

Best Publications

  • Comparative phylogeography of the ocean planet.

    Brian W. Bowen;Michelle R. Gaither;Joseph D. DiBattista;Matthew Iacchei

  • A review of contemporary patterns of endemism for shallow water reef fauna in the Red Sea

    Joseph D. DiBattista;Joseph D. DiBattista;May B. Roberts;Jessica Bouwmeester;Jessica Bouwmeester;Brian W. Bowen

  • Genetic evaluation of marine biogeographical barriers: perspectives from two widespread Indo-Pacific snappers (Lutjanus kasmira and Lutjanus fulvus)

    Michelle R. Gaither;Robert J. Toonen;D. Ross Robertson;Serge Planes

  • On the origin of endemic species in the Red Sea

    Joseph D. DiBattista;Joseph D. DiBattista;J. Howard Choat;Michelle R. Gaither;Michelle R. Gaither;Jean-Paul A. Hobbs

  • Origins of species richness in the Indo‐Malay‐Philippine biodiversity hotspot: evidence for the centre of overlap hypothesis

    Michelle R. Gaither;Luiz A. Rocha

  • Defining Boundaries for Ecosystem-Based Management: A Multispecies Case Study of Marine Connectivity across the Hawaiian Archipelago.

    Robert J. Toonen;Kimberly R. Andrews;Iliana B. Baums;Christopher E. Bird

  • Phylogeography of the reef fish Cephalopholis argus (Epinephelidae) indicates Pleistocene isolation across the indo-pacific barrier with contemporary overlap in the coral triangle

    Michelle R Gaither;Brian W Bowen;Tiana-Rae Bordenave;Luiz A Rocha

  • Reefs and islands of the Chagos Archipelago, Indian Ocean: why it is the world's largest no-take marine protected area.

    Charles (Charles R. C.) Sheppard;M. Ateweberhan;B. W. Bowen;P. Carr

  • After continents divide: comparative phylogeography of reef fishes from the Red Sea and Indian Ocean

    Joseph D. DiBattista;Michael L. Berumen;Michael L. Berumen;Michelle R. Gaither;Luiz A. Rocha

  • Genomic signatures of geographic isolation and natural selection in coral reef fishes.

    Michelle R. Gaither;Michelle R. Gaither;Moisés A. Bernal;Moisés A. Bernal;Richard R. Coleman;Brian W. Bowen

  • The Genomic Observatories Metadatabase (GeOMe): A new repository for field and sampling event metadata associated with genetic samples.

    John Deck;Michelle R. Gaither;Rodney Ewing;Christopher E. Bird;Christopher E. Bird

  • A practical guide to sample preservation and pre-PCR processing of aquatic environmental DNA.

    Girish Kumar;Jeff E. Eble;Michelle R. Gaither

  • High Connectivity in the Deepwater Snapper Pristipomoides filamentosus (Lutjanidae) across the Indo-Pacific with Isolation of the Hawaiian Archipelago

    Michelle R. Gaither;Shelley A. Jones;Christopher Kelley;Stephen J. Newman

  • Fishes that rule the world: circumtropical distributions revisited

    Michelle R Gaither;Michelle R Gaither;Brian W Bowen;Luiz A Rocha;John C Briggs

  • One size does not fit all: Tuning eDNA protocols for high- and low-turbidity water sampling

    Girish Kumar;Emily Farrell;Ashley M. Reaume;Jeff A. Eble

  • Seascape genetics along environmental gradients in the Arabian Peninsula: insights from ddRAD sequencing of anemonefishes

    Pablo Saenz-Agudelo;Pablo Saenz-Agudelo;Joseph D. Dibattista;Joseph D. Dibattista;Marek J. Piatek;Michelle R. Gaither;Michelle R. Gaither

  • Preservation of corals in salt-saturated DMSO buffer is superior to ethanol for PCR experiments

    M. R. Gaither;Z. Szabó;M. W. Crepeau;C. E. Bird

  • Twisted sister species of pygmy angelfishes: discordance between taxonomy, coloration, and phylogenetics

    Joseph D. DiBattista;Ellen Waldrop;Brian W. Bowen;Jennifer K. Schultz

  • The molecular biogeography of the Indo-Pacific: testing hypotheses with multispecies genetic patterns

    Eric D. Crandall;Cynthia Riginos;Chris E. Bird;Libby Liggins;Libby Liggins

  • Large-scale introduction of the Indo-Pacific damselfish Abudefduf vaigiensis into Hawai'i promotes genetic swamping of the endemic congener A. abdominalis

    Richard R. Coleman;Michelle R. Gaither;Michelle R. Gaither;Bethany Kimokeo;Frank G. Stanton

  • biogeographical barriers: perspectives from two widespread Indo-Pacific snappers (Lutjanus kasmira and Lutjanus fulvus)

    Michelle R. Gaither;Robert J. Toonen;D. Ross Robertson;Serge Planes

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian W. Bowen
Brian W. Bowen University of Hawaii at Manoa
Joseph D. DiBattista
Joseph D. DiBattista Griffith University
Robert J. Toonen
Robert J. Toonen University of Hawaii at Manoa
Luiz A. Rocha
Luiz A. Rocha California Academy of Sciences
Michael L. Berumen
Michael L. Berumen King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Cynthia Riginos
Cynthia Riginos University of Queensland
Jean-Paul A. Hobbs
Jean-Paul A. Hobbs Curtin University
J. Howard Choat
J. Howard Choat James Cook University
Jeffrey M. Leis
Jeffrey M. Leis University of Tasmania
Christopher P. Meyer
Christopher P. Meyer Smithsonian Institution

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open doors to various interdisciplinary careers connected to Ecology and Evolution. For those interested in blending scientific knowledge with creative communication, a graphic design online degree offers a way to develop impactful educational materials, data visualizations, and outreach for conservation efforts.

Students aiming for a broader foundation might consider the best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees. These programs let individuals combine ecological sciences with policy, education, or communication, supporting a variety of roles in environmental organizations.

Understanding historical contexts is essential in ecology, especially for conservation and restoration work. Earning a best online history masters can help graduates integrate past land use, climate changes, and evolutionary patterns into modern research and policy-making.

For those interested in information science, environmental data, or archiving, reviewing the average cost of mlis degree us can help you plan a path toward managing ecological databases, libraries, and research collections.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle R. Gaither

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles