World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
8040
World Ranking
9716
National Ranking
960

Michel Treisman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michel Treisman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michel Treisman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michel Treisman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1981 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Michel Treisman is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research career includes recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1981.

Throughout their academic work, Treisman has contributed to various areas in scientific research, though specific details about their main fields of study, subfields, or topics of work have not been listed. There are also no records of recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications in the available data.

No detailed list of research papers, including titles, publication venues, or years, is available for Treisman in the provided information. Similarly, there are no identified frequent collaborators or journals where Treisman regularly publishes.

The award of Fellowship by the AAAS in 1981 signifies a recognized status within the scientific community. However, further context or citation information related to this award has not been provided.

Best Publications

  • Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

    Michel Treisman

  • The Internal Clock: Evidence for a Temporal Oscillator Underlying Time Perception with Some Estimates of its Characteristic Frequency:

    Michel Treisman;Andrew Faulkner;Peter L N Naish;David Brogan

  • Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis

    Michel Treisman

  • Discriminative responses to stimulation during human sleep.

    Ian Oswald;Anne M. Taylor;Michel Treisman

  • What do sensory scales measure

    Michel Treisman

  • Temporal rhythms and cerebral rhythms.

    Michel Treisman

  • The internal clock: Electroencephalographic evidence for oscillatory processes underlying time perception

    Michel Treisman;Norman Cook;Peter L. N. Naish;Janice K. MacCrone

  • There Are Two Word-Length Effects in Verbal Short-Term Memory: Opposed Effects of Duration and Complexity

    Nelson Cowan;Noelle L. Wood;Lara D. Nugent;Michel Treisman

  • On the Relation Between Time Perception and the Timing of Motor Action: Evidence for a Temporal Oscillator Controlling the Timing of Movement

    Michel Treisman;Andrew Faulkner;Peter L. N. Naish

  • The Magical Number Seven and Some Other Features of Category Scaling: Properties of a Model for Absolute Judgment

    Michel Treisman

  • NOISE AND WEBER'S LAW: THE DISCRIMINATION OF BRIGHTNESS AND OTHER DIMENSIONS.

    Michel Treisman

  • Relation between signal detectability theory and the traditional procedures for measuring sensory thresholds: Estimating d' from results given by the method of constant simuli.

    Michel Treisman;T. R. Watts

  • Spatial frequency discrimination: visual long-term memory or criterion setting?

    Martin Lages;Michel Treisman

  • THE SETTING AND MAINTENANCE OF CRITERIA REPRESENTING LEVELS OF CONFIDENCE

    Michel Treisman;Andrew Faulkner

  • Signal detection theory and Crozier's law: Derivation of a new sensory scaling procedure

    Michel Treisman

  • Generation of random sequences by human subjects: Cognitive operations or psychological process?

    Michel Treisman;Andrew Faulkner

  • THE EFFECT OF ONE STIMULUS ON THE THRESHOLD FOR ANOTHER: AN APPLICATION OF SIGNAL DETECTABILITY THEORY1

    Michel Treisman

  • Bird song dialects, repertoire size, and kin association

    Michel Treisman

  • Time perception and the internal clock: Effects of visual flicker on the temporal oscillator

    Michel Treisman;David Brogan

  • A theory of criterion setting: an alternative to the attention band and response ratio hypotheses in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching.

    Michel Treisman

  • Sensory scaling: Unanswered questions

    Michel Treisman

  • The evolutionary restriction of aggression within a species: A game theory analysis

    Michel Treisman

  • Laws of Sensory Magnitude

    Michel Treisman

  • Space or lexicon? The word frequency effect and the error response frequency effect

    Michel Treisman

  • A Theory of the Identification of Complex Stimuli with an Application to Word Recognition.

    Michel Treisman

Frequent Co-Authors

Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Richard Dawkins
Richard Dawkins University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding online degrees and career pathways. Students often consider fields such as clinical psychology, counseling, human services, or specialized areas like Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).

For those interested in helping individuals improve behavioral outcomes, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a popular choice. The process can vary by location, as education and certification requirements differ from state to state. For example, if you’re wondering how to become a bcba in Irvine, you’ll need to follow specific academic, experience, and examination steps. Similarly, exploring Irving bcba education requirements can help you understand what’s needed in that area.

Local guidelines can influence your journey, so it’s valuable to check resources for each city. If you are considering a career in Florida, detailed information about Jacksonville bcba requirements can guide your preparation. In New Jersey, aspiring professionals should consult advice on how to become a bcba in Jersey City for local regulations.

Overall, online psychology degrees provide a versatile foundation for a variety of careers, and understanding specific regional requirements is key for credentials like the BCBA.

Best Scientists Citing Michel Treisman