What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Astronomy
- Astrophysics
- Milky Way
His primary areas of investigation include Astrophysics, Gravitational microlensing, Astronomy, Planet and Bulge.
His is doing research in Stars, Gravitational lens, Light curve, Milky Way and Galaxy, both of which are found in Astrophysics.
Michał K. Szymański has included themes like COSMIC cancer database, Quasar and Sky in his Stars study.
Michał K. Szymański has researched Gravitational lens in several fields, including Weak gravitational lensing, Small Magellanic Cloud and Photometry.
His Gravitational microlensing study incorporates themes from Brown dwarf, Einstein radius, Mass ratio, Stellar mass and Dark matter.
As part of the same scientific family, he usually focuses on Bulge, concentrating on Galactic Center and intersecting with Photometry.
His most cited work include:
- An eclipsing-binary distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud accurate to two per cent (606 citations)
- Discovery of a cool planet of 5.5 Earth masses through gravitational microlensing (526 citations)
- One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations (475 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Astrophysics, Gravitational microlensing, Astronomy, Stars and Light curve.
His Gravitational lens, Planet, Bulge, Variable star and Mass ratio investigations are all subjects of Astrophysics research.
His Planet research includes elements of Low Mass and Star.
Michał K. Szymański works mostly in the field of Gravitational microlensing, limiting it down to topics relating to Parallax and, in certain cases, Microlens, as a part of the same area of interest.
His study in the field of Photometry, Milky Way, Photometry and Binary star is also linked to topics like Event.
His Stars research integrates issues from Luminosity and Galaxy.
He most often published in these fields:
- Astrophysics (83.63%)
- Gravitational microlensing (48.43%)
- Astronomy (47.09%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Astrophysics (83.63%)
- Gravitational microlensing (48.43%)
- Planet (26.35%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Astrophysics, Gravitational microlensing, Planet, Light curve and Stars.
His study in Mass ratio, Bulge, Einstein radius, Brown dwarf and Milky Way falls within the category of Astrophysics.
The subject of his Gravitational microlensing research is within the realm of Astronomy.
His work on Photometry as part of general Astronomy research is frequently linked to Event, bridging the gap between disciplines.
The Light curve study combines topics in areas such as Brightness, Galactic plane, Super-Earth and Event.
His study in the fields of Cepheid variable, Variable star, RR Lyrae variable and Globular cluster under the domain of Stars overlaps with other disciplines such as Disc.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- A three-dimensional map of the Milky Way using classical Cepheid variable stars (70 citations)
- A Neptune-mass Free-floating Planet Candidate Discovered by Microlensing Surveys (51 citations)
- Rotation curve of the Milky Way from Classical Cepheids (49 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Astronomy
- Astrophysics
- Milky Way
Michał K. Szymański mainly focuses on Astrophysics, Gravitational microlensing, Planet, Bulge and Stars.
His research in Light curve, Mass ratio, Gravitational lens, Galaxy and Cepheid variable are components of Astrophysics.
His Gravitational microlensing study is concerned with the larger field of Astronomy.
His research in the fields of Late type and Jupiter overlaps with other disciplines such as Event.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Amplitude, Metallicity, Spectrometer and Proper motion in addition to Planet.
His Bulge study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Orbit and Star.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
