World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
73
Citations
32736
World Ranking
5795
National Ranking
2739

Martha M. Monick publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha M. Monick sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Martha M. Monick D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha M. Monick sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martha M. Monick is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their academic profile indicates an active research career primarily associated with this institution.

Information regarding specific research papers, including titles and publication venues, is not available for this scientist. Similarly, there are no recorded co-authors, indicating either independent research or no publicly accessible collaborations at present.

Details on frequent publication venues, book publications, main fields and subfields of study, and specific topics of work have not been documented for Martha M. Monick. The absence of such data limits insights into the focus areas and disciplinary expertise typically reflective of a scientist's research trajectory.

No awards or honors have been recorded for this individual, and the available data confirms that they are currently active and not deceased.

This profile is constructed solely from the available information without extrapolation beyond the documented facts.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Respiratory Epithelial Cells Convert Inactive Vitamin D to Its Active Form: Potential Effects on Host Defense

    Sif Hansdottir;Martha M. Monick;Sara L. Hinde;Nina Lovan

  • Local allergen challenge and bronchoalveolar lavage of allergic asthmatic lungs. Description of the model and local airway inflammation.

    Metzger Wj;Zavala D;Richerson Hb;Moseley P

  • The p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Is Required for NF-κB-dependent Gene Expression THE ROLE OF TATA-BINDING PROTEIN (TBP)

    A. Brent Carter;Kevin L. Knudtson;Martha M. Monick;Gary W. Hunninghake

  • Vitamin D Decreases Respiratory Syncytial Virus Induction of NF-κB–Linked Chemokines and Cytokines in Airway Epithelium While Maintaining the Antiviral State

    Sif Hansdottir;Martha M. Monick;Nina Lovan;Linda Powers

  • Both Erk and p38 kinases are necessary for cytokine gene transcription.

    Aaron Brent Carter;Martha M. Monick;Gary W. Hunninghake

  • Respiratory syncytial virus up-regulates TLR4 and sensitizes airway epithelial cells to endotoxin

    Martha M. Monick;Timur O. Yarovinsky;Linda S. Powers;Noah S. Butler

  • Lipopolysaccharide induces prostaglandin H synthase-2 protein and mRNA in human alveolar macrophages and blood monocytes.

    S L Hempel;M M Monick;G W Hunninghake

  • Bronchoalveolar lavage of allergic asthmatic patients following allergen bronchoprovocation.

    W J Metzger;H B Richerson;K Worden;M Monick

  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Induces TLR3 Protein and Protein Kinase R, Leading to Increased Double-Stranded RNA Responsiveness in Airway Epithelial Cells

    Dayna J. Groskreutz;Martha M. Monick;Linda S. Powers;Timur O. Yarovinsky

  • Cigarette Smoke Induces Cellular Senescence

    Toru Nyunoya;Martha M. Monick;Aloysius Klingelhutz;Timur O. Yarovinsky

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Coordinated Changes in AHRR Methylation in Lymphoblasts and Pulmonary Macrophages from Smokers

    Martha M. Monick;Steven R.H. Beach;Jeff Plume;Jeff Plume;Rory Sears

  • Identification of an Autophagy Defect in Smokers’ Alveolar Macrophages

    Martha M. Monick;Linda S. Powers;Katherine Walters;Nina Lovan

  • Important Roles for Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor, CC Chemokine Ligand 2, and Mononuclear Phagocytes in the Pathogenesis of Pulmonary Fibrosis

    Christopher P. Baran;Judy M. Opalek;Sara McMaken;Christie A. Newland

  • Vitamin D effects on lung immunity and respiratory diseases.

    Sif Hansdottir;Martha M. Monick

  • The effect of smoking on DNA methylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from African American women

    Meeshanthini V. Dogan;Bridget Shields;Carolyn E. Cutrona;Long Gao

  • Local Allergen Challenge and Bronchoalveolar Lavage of Allergic Asthmatic Lungs

    W. James Metzger;Donald Zavala;Hal B. Richerson;Pope Moseley

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark F. Stinski
Mark F. Stinski University of Iowa
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Shazib Pervaiz
Shazib Pervaiz National University of Singapore
Sergio Lavandero
Sergio Lavandero University of Chile
Steven Finkbeiner
Steven Finkbeiner University of California, San Francisco
Pope L. Moseley
Pope L. Moseley University of Copenhagen
Leonidas C. Platanias
Leonidas C. Platanias Northwestern University
Hsing Jien Kung
Hsing Jien Kung Taipei Medical University
Steven M. Varga
Steven M. Varga University of Iowa
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a variety of meaningful careers in healthcare, research, and management. Many students now turn to online degree programs for flexibility and fast-tracking their studies. For example, those interested in mental health can consider psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online, combining biological knowledge with advanced clinical skills.

Nutrition is another growing field, with accessible options such as a 2 year nutrition degree online providing a quick pathway to careers in dietetics, food science, or wellness coaching. If you are interested in leadership, a cheapest online mba healthcare management can position you for management roles in hospitals, laboratories, and biotech firms.

Certification opens even more options. Understanding the difference between ccs vs cpc certification is valuable for those leaning toward medical coding or health information management. With so many pathways available, online degrees in these areas can help you tailor your career to your interests and the latest industry needs.

Best Scientists Citing Martha M. Monick