World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
80
Citations
20701
World Ranking
4138
National Ranking
2029

Mark J. Young publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Young sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 242 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark J. Young D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Young sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark J. Young is affiliated with Montana State University in the United States and works primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research contributions span several subfields including Surgery, Oral Surgery, Ecology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's publications reflect a focus on topics such as:

  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
  • Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Mark J. Young has contributed research articles to a variety of scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • MorphoSource Media (15 publications)
  • Cureus (3 publications)
  • Journal of Virology (2 publications)
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2 publications)
  • JAMA Cardiology (1 publication)

Recent research papers authored by or connected to Mark J. Young include:

  • "Self-expanding Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients," 2022, JAMA Cardiology
  • "Gut bacteriophage dynamics during fecal microbial transplantation in subjects with metabolic syndrome," 2021, Gut Microbes
  • "Effect of Inactivation Methods on SARS-CoV-2 Virion Protein and Structure," 2021, Viruses
  • "Catheter to vein ratio and risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-associated thrombosis according to diagnostic group: a retrospective cohort study," 2021, BMJ Open
  • "Bacterial Viruses Subcommittee and Archaeal Viruses Subcommittee of the ICTV: update of taxonomy changes in 2021," 2021, Archives of Virology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, notably:

  • Brian Bothner
  • Eric S. Boyd
  • Ross Hartman
  • C. Martin Lawrence
  • Usama Abu-Heija

Best Publications

  • Host–guest encapsulation of materials by assembled virus protein cages

    Trevor Douglas;Mark Young

  • Inorganic–Organic Nanotube Composites from Template Mineralization of Tobacco Mosaic Virus

    Wayne Shenton;Trevor Douglas;Mark Young;Gerald Stubbs

  • Viruses: Making Friends with Old Foes

    Trevor Douglas;Mark Young

  • Minimum information about an uncultivated virus genome (MIUVIG)

    Simon Roux;Evelien M. Adriaenssens;Bas E. Dutilh;Eugene V. Koonin

  • Biological Containers: Protein Cages as Multifunctional Nanoplatforms

    Masaki Uchida;Michael T. Klem;Mark Allen;Peter Suci

  • Healthy human gut phageome

    Pilar Manrique;Benjamin Bolduc;Seth T. Walk;John van der Oost

  • Targeting of cancer cells with ferrimagnetic ferritin cage nanoparticles.

    Masaki Uchida;Michelle L Flenniken;Mark Allen;Deborah A Willits

  • Protein Engineering of a Viral Cage for Constrained Nanomaterials Synthesis

    Trevor Douglas;Erica Strable;Deborah Willits;Abdelaziz Aitouchen

  • Mechanism of capsid assembly for an icosahedral plant virus.

    Adam Zlotnick;Ryan Aldrich;Jennifer M. Johnson;Pablo Ceres

  • Structural and functional characterization of an archaeal clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated complex for antiviral defense (CASCADE).

    Nathanael G. Lintner;Melina Kerou;Susan K. Brumfield;Shirley Graham

  • Plant viruses as biotemplates for materials and their use in nanotechnology.

    Mark Young;Debbie Willits;Masaki Uchida;Trevor Douglas

  • The structure of a thermophilic archaeal virus shows a double-stranded DNA viral capsid type that spans all domains of life.

    George Rice;Liang Tang;Kenneth Stedman;Francisco Roberto

  • The Human Gut Phage Community and Its Implications for Health and Disease.

    Pilar Manrique;Michael Dills;Mark J. Young

  • Paramagnetic viral nanoparticles as potential high-relaxivity magnetic resonance contrast agents.

    Mark Allen;Jeff W. M. Bulte;Lars Liepold;Gautam Basu

  • VIRUS PARTICLES AS TEMPLATES FOR MATERIALS SYNTHESIS

    Trevor Douglas;Mark Young

  • Protein Cage Constrained Synthesis of Ferrimagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

    Mark Allen;Debbie Willits;Jesse Mosolf;Mark Young

  • In vitro assembly of cowpea chlorotic mottle virus from coat protein expressed in Escherichia coli and in vitro-transcribed viral cDNA.

    Xiaoxia Zhao;James M. Fox;Norman H. Olson;Timothy S. Baker

  • Assembly of viral metagenomes from yellowstone hot springs.

    Thomas Schoenfeld;Melodee Patterson;Paul M. Richardson;K. Eric Wommack

  • Metagenomes from high-temperature chemotrophic systems reveal geochemical controls on microbial community structure and function

    William P. Inskeep;Douglas B. Rusch;Zackary J. Jay;Markus J. Herrgard

  • Structure of an archaeal virus capsid protein reveals a common ancestry to eukaryotic and bacterial viruses.

    Reza Khayat;Liang Tang;Eric T. Larson;C. Martin Lawrence

Frequent Co-Authors

Trevor Douglas
Trevor Douglas Indiana University
Blake Wiedenheft
Blake Wiedenheft Montana State University
John E. Johnson
John E. Johnson Scripps Research Institute
Brian Bothner
Brian Bothner Montana State University
Mark A. Jutila
Mark A. Jutila Montana State University
John W. Peters
John W. Peters Washington State University
Allen G. Harmsen
Allen G. Harmsen Montana State University
Adam Zlotnick
Adam Zlotnick Indiana University
Philip S. Tsao
Philip S. Tsao Stanford University
Stan J. J. Brouns
Stan J. J. Brouns Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Biology and Biochemistry grows, students are exploring diverse degree options and professional opportunities. Online programs now offer flexibility for those pursuing advanced studies while managing work or personal commitments.

For individuals interested in leadership roles within healthcare, earning a phd in healthcare management can open doors to executive positions, policy development, and academic careers. Those wishing to play a key role in the evolving field of medicine might consider online pharmd programs, which prepare graduates for advanced pharmacy practice and research roles.

Not all students aim for clinical or research-based professions. An exercise science degree online accredited offers a pathway to careers in fitness coaching, wellness management, and rehabilitation. Similarly, an accelerated kinesiology degree online helps students quickly enter fields such as sports science, physical therapy assistant, or athletic training.

By leveraging these online degree options, students can tailor their education to align with their career goals across healthcare, research, fitness, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles