World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcin Stępień

Marcin Stępień

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 47 15598 14068 73 65 111 8375

Marcin Stępień publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcin Stępień between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcin Stępień published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2022. 17 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2022. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 4 publications
1999 2025

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcin Stępień: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 10
2008 3
2009 1
2010 2
2011 4
2012 2
2013 9
2014 5
2015 7
2016 9
2017 5
2018 7
2019 8
2020 9
2021 4
2022 19
2023 16
2024 13
2025 4
Total 152
Download as CSV

Marcin Stępień publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcin Stępień sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 111 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623 111
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcin Stępień D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcin Stępień sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776 47
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcin Stępień is affiliated with the University of Wrocław in Poland. Their research spans primarily the fields of Materials Science and Chemistry, with a significant focus on Materials Chemistry and Organic Chemistry.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
  • Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
  • Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
  • Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
  • Crystallography and molecular interactions

One area of concentration is the study and application of aromatic compounds, especially in relation to their synthesis and structural properties. Their contributions to crystallography techniques, particularly X-ray diffraction methods, indicate a specialization in molecular-level structural analysis.

Marcin Stępień has published extensively across several reputable venues. The most frequent venues include:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database (32 publications)
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (9 publications)
  • Angewandte Chemie (9 publications)
  • Chemistry - A European Journal (3 publications)
  • Organic Chemistry Frontiers (3 publications)

Recent papers published illustrate the scope and topics covered in their research:

  • "Recent Advances in Heterocyclic Nanographenes and Other Polycyclic Heteroaromatic Compounds," 2021, Chemical Reviews
  • "Aromatic Nanosandwich Obtained by σ-Dimerization of a Nanographenoid π-Radical," 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Dinor[7]helicene and Beyond: Divergent Synthesis of Chiral Diradicaloids with Variable Open-Shell Character," 2023, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • "Emerging applications of curved aromatic compounds," 2022, Trends in Chemistry
  • "Feeding a Molecular Squid: A Pliable Nanocarbon Receptor for Electron-Poor Aromatics," 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, reflecting a network of research partnerships. These include:

  • Tadeusz Lis
  • Piotr J. Chmielewski
  • Joanna Cybińska
  • Carlos J. Gómez-García
  • Yogesh Kumar Maurya

Best Publications

  • Heterocyclic Nanographenes and Other Polycyclic Heteroaromatic Compounds: Synthetic Routes, Properties, and Applications

    Marcin Stępień;Elżbieta Gońka;Marika Żyła;Natasza Sprutta

  • Recent Advances in Heterocyclic Nanographenes and Other Polycyclic Heteroaromatic Compounds.

    Arseni Borissov;Yogesh Kumar Maurya;Liliia Moshniaha;Wai-Shing Wong

  • Figure Eights, Möbius Bands, and More: Conformation and Aromaticity of Porphyrinoids

    Marcin Stępień;Natasza Sprutta;Lechosław Latos-Grażyński

  • Bowls, Hoops, and Saddles: Synthetic Approaches to Curved Aromatic Molecules

    Marcin A. Majewski;Marcin Stępień

  • Expanded Porphyrin with a Split Personality: A Hückel–Möbius Aromaticity Switch

    Marcin Stępień;Lechosław Latos-Grażyński;Natasza Sprutta;Paulina Chwalisz

  • Benziporphyrins: exploring arene chemistry in a macrocyclic environment.

    Marcin Stepien;Lechosław Latos-Grazynski

  • Figure‐Eight‐Strukturen, Möbius‐Bänder und mehr: Konformation und Aromatizität von Porphyrinoiden

    Marcin Stępień;Natasza Sprutta;Lechosław Latos‐Grażyński

  • Tetraphenylbenziporphyrin--a ligand for organometallic chemistry.

    Marcin Stępień;Lechosław Latos-Grażyński

  • Cadmium(II) and Nickel(II) Complexes of Benziporphyrins. A Study of Weak Intramolecular Metal−Arene Interactions

    Marcin Stepien;Lechosław Latos-Grazynski;Ludmiła Szterenberg;Jarosław Panek

  • Lemniscular [16]Cycloparaphenylene: A Radially Conjugated Figure-Eight Aromatic Molecule

    Kabali Senthilkumar;Mateusz Kondratowicz;Tadeusz Lis;Piotr J Chmielewski

  • Tetraphenyl-p-benziporphyrin: A Carbaporphyrinoid with Two Linked Carbon Atoms in the Coordination Core

    Marcin Stepien;Lechosław Latos-Grazynski

  • Octamethyl-octaundecylcyclo[8]pyrrole: a promising sulfate anion extractant.

    Leah R. Eller;Marcin Stepien;Christopher J. Fowler;Jeong Tae Lee

  • Three-level topology switching in a molecular Möbius band.

    Marcin Stepień;Bartosz Szyszko;Lechosław Latos-Grazyński

  • Supramolecular liquid crystals based on cyclo[8]pyrrole

    Marcin Stępień;Marcin Stępień;Bertrand Donnio;Jonathan L. Sessler

  • The Fold‐In Approach to Bowl‐Shaped Aromatic Compounds: Synthesis of Chrysaoroles

    Damian Myśliwiec;Marcin Stępień

  • Schalen, Reifen und Sattel: Methoden zur Synthese gebogener aromatischer Moleküle

    Marcin A. Majewski;Marcin Stępień

  • Octulene: A Hyperbolic Molecular Belt that Binds Chloride Anions

    Marcin A. Majewski;Yongseok Hong;Tadeusz Lis;Janusz Gregoliński

  • Palladium (II) complexes of oxybenziporphyrin.

    Marcin Stepien;Lechosław Latos-Grazynski;Timothy D. Lash;Ludmiła Szterenberg

  • Expanded hexapyrrolohexaazacoronenes. Near-infrared absorbing chromophores with interrupted peripheral conjugation.

    Elżbieta Gońka;Piotr J. Chmielewski;Tadeusz Lis;Marcin Stępień

  • Aromaticity and Tautomerism in Porphyrins and Porphyrinoids

    M Stępień;L. Latos-Grażyński

  • Peripherally Fused Porphyrins via the Scholl Reaction: Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Mesomorphism

    Damian Myśliwiec;Bertrand Donnio;Piotr J. Chmielewski;Benoît Heinrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Piotr J. Chmielewski
Piotr J. Chmielewski University of Wrocław
Lechosław Latos-Grażyński
Lechosław Latos-Grażyński University of Wrocław
Tadeusz Lis
Tadeusz Lis University of Wrocław
Dongho Kim
Dongho Kim Yonsei University
Jonathan L. Sessler
Jonathan L. Sessler The University of Texas at Austin
Mieczyslaw Lapkowski
Mieczyslaw Lapkowski Silesian University of Technology
Juan Casado
Juan Casado University of Malaga
Alan L. Balch
Alan L. Balch University of California, Davis
Michael R. Wasielewski
Michael R. Wasielewski Northwestern University
Dirk Volkmer
Dirk Volkmer University of Augsburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree opens doors to various career paths, many of which have complementary online education options. Understanding the criminal justice degree cost can be helpful for students exploring interdisciplinary roles, especially when considering roles in regulatory or compliance sectors related to chemical safety.

For those interested in entering the workforce quickly, finding an accredited online criminal justice associate degree can provide a solid foundation while branching out into related fields like environmental law or forensic chemistry.

Another career avenue connected to Chemistry graduates is working within the legal framework of the industry. Reviewing paralegal salary insights can help gauge the earning potential in this sector, which often supports chemical patent cases or regulatory compliance.

For those aiming at a commercial role, becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative is a popular choice. Learning more about how much do pharmaceutical sales reps make can provide motivation and clarity on the financial rewards and career growth opportunities in this pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Marcin Stępień

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles