World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 21 1950 1800 66 63 94 1405

Marcel Hanegraaff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcel Hanegraaff between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcel Hanegraaff published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2022. 9 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2022. 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications
2011 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcel Hanegraaff: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 3
2012 2
2013 1
2014 0
2015 6
2016 4
2017 9
2018 3
2019 10
2020 14
2021 8
2022 37
2023 11
2024 3
2025 6
Total 117
Download as CSV

Marcel Hanegraaff publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Hanegraaff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–95 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 94 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65 94
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Marcel Hanegraaff D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Hanegraaff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 21 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 21 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79 21
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Balancing inside and outside lobbying : The political strategies of lobbyists at global diplomatic conferences

    Marcel Hanegraaff;Jan Beyers;Iskander De Bruycker

  • Making Inference across Mobilisation and Influence Research: Comparing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mapping of Interest Systems.

    Joost Berkhout;Jan Beyers;Caelesta Braun;Marcel Hanegraaff

  • Is the EU different? Comparing the diversity of national and EU-level systems of interest organisations

    Joost Berkhout;Marcel Hanegraaff;Caelesta Braun

  • Open the door to more of the same? The development of interest group representation at the WTO

    Marcel Hanegraaff;Jan Beyers;Caelesta Braun

  • Transnational Advocacy over Time: Business and NGO Mobilization at UN Climate Summits

    Marcel Hanegraaff

  • Explaining the patterns of contacts between interest groups and political parties: Revising the standard model for populist times:

    Joost Berkhout;Marcel Hanegraaff;Patrick Statsch

  • More business as usual? Explaining business bias across issues and institutions in the European Union

    Marcel Hanegraaff;Joost Berkhout

  • Changes in interest group access in times of crisis: no pain, no (lobby) gain

    Wiebke Marie Junk;Michele Crepaz;Marcel Hanegraaff;Joost Berkhout

  • United in fear: Interest group coalition formation as a weapon of the weak?

    Marcel Hanegraaff;Andrea Pritoni

  • The Domestic and Global Origins of Transnational Advocacy Explaining Lobbying Presence During WTO Ministerial Conferences

    Marcel Hanegraaff;Marcel Hanegraaff;Caelesta Braun;Dirk De Bièvre;Jan Beyers

  • Does climate advocacy matter? The importance of competing interest groups for national climate policies

    Unknown

  • The paradox of collective action: Linking interest aggregation and interest articulation in EU legislative lobbying

    Iskander De Bruycker;Joost Berkhout;Marcel Hanegraaff

  • Is There a First Mover Advantage in Lobbying? A Comparative Analysis of How the Timing of Mobilization Affects the Influence of Interest Groups in 10 Polities

    Unknown

  • Public opinion and interest groups’ concerns for organizational survival

    Marcel Hanegraaff;Arlo Poletti

  • Standing in a Crowded Room: Exploring the Relation between Interest Group System Density and Access to Policymakers:

    Marcel Hanegraaff;Jens van der Ploeg;Joost Berkhout

  • Is politics under increasing corporate sway? : A longitudinal study on the drivers of corporate access

    Ellis Aizenberg;Marcel Hanegraaff

  • Balancing friends and foes: Explaining advocacy styles at global diplomatic conferences

    Jan Beyers;Marcel Hanegraaff;Marcel Hanegraaff

  • The rise of corporate lobbying in the European Union: An agenda for future research

    Marcel Hanegraaff;Arlo Poletti

  • The funding of interest groups in the EU: are the rich getting richer?

    Michele Crepaz;Marcel Hanegraaff

  • Lobbying the lobbyists: when and why do policymakers seek to influence advocacy groups in global governance?

    Kirsten Lucas;Marcel Hanegraaff;Iskander De Bruycker

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Beyers
Jan Beyers University of Antwerp
Joost Berkhout
Joost Berkhout Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk De Bièvre
Dirk De Bièvre University of Antwerp
Iskander De Bruycker
Iskander De Bruycker Maastricht University
David Lowery
David Lowery Pennsylvania State University
Virginia Gray
Virginia Gray University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
William A. Maloney
William A. Maloney Newcastle University
Darren Halpin
Darren Halpin Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Marcel Hanegraaff

Recently Published Articles