World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
43
Citations
8406
World Ranking
4393
National Ranking
744

Lynn A. Staeheli publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn A. Staeheli sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 119 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Lynn A. Staeheli D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn A. Staeheli sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lynn A. Staeheli was affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spanned the field of Social Sciences with notable work in various subfields, including Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing, Demography, and Anthropology.

Their scholarly contributions focused on several core research topics:

  • Digital Storytelling and Education
  • Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Children's Rights and Participation
  • Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
  • Anthropological Studies and Insights

Lynn A. Staeheli published research in multiple academic venues. Key journals where their work appeared include:

  • Children's Geographies
  • Geopolitics
  • Dialogues in Human Geography

Three recent papers highlighted in their body of work are:

  • "Intergenerational place-based digital storytelling: a more-than-visual research method" (2021) in Children's Geographies
  • "Cosmopolitan Geopolitics" (2020) in Geopolitics
  • "Temporalities in motion" (2020) in Dialogues in Human Geography

Their research showed an interdisciplinary approach integrating sociopolitical perspectives with participatory methods in visual and digital storytelling contexts. This approach also encompassed topics related to migration and children's participation within geographic and geopolitical frameworks.

Frequent collaborators included researchers such as David Marshall and Dima Smaira, indicating a collaborative research environment in related fields.

Best Publications

  • Home and Migration: Mobilities, Belongings and Identities

    David Ralph;Lynn A. Staeheli

  • The People's Property?: Power, Politics, and the Public.

    Lynn Staeheli;Donald Mitchell

  • Introduction: intimacy‐geopolitics and violence

    Rachel Pain;Lynn Staeheli

  • Dreaming the ordinary Daily life and the complex geographies of citizenship

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Patricia Ehrkamp;Helga Leitner;Caroline R. Nagel

  • Political geography: Where’s citizenship?:

    Lynn A. Staeheli

  • Citizenship and the problem of community

    Lynn A. Staeheli

  • Conflicting rights to the city in New York's community gardens

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Don Mitchell;Kristina Gibson

  • A Discussion of “Women in the Field”: The Politics of Feminist Fieldwork

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Victoria A. Lawson

  • Mapping Women, Making Politics : Feminist Perspectives on Political Geography

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Eleonore Kofman;Linda Peake

  • USA's Destiny? Regulating Space and Creating Community in American Shopping Malls

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Don Mitchell

  • Citizenship, Community, and Struggles for Public Space

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Albert Thompson

  • Empowering political struggle: spaces and scales of resistance

    Lynn A. Staeheli

  • Topographies of Home and Citizenship: Arab-American Activists in the United States

    Lynn A Staeheli;Caroline R Nagel

  • Locating the public in research and practice

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Don Mitchell

  • The Complex Politics of Relevance in Geography

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Don Mitchell

  • Feminism, Praxis, and Human Geography

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Victoria A. Lawson

  • Citizenship, Identity, and Transnational Migration: Arab Immigrants to the US

    Caroline R. Nagel;Lynn A. Staeheli

  • Integration and the negotiation of ‘here’ and ‘there’: the case of British Arab activists

    Caroline R. Nagel;Lynn A. Staeheli

  • Permitting Protest: Parsing the Fine Geography of Dissent in America

    Don Mitchell;Lynn A. Staeheli

  • American citizenship: The quest for inclusion

    Lynn A. Staeheli;Meghan S. Cope

  • Whose Public Space? International Case Studies in Urban Design and Development

    Lynn A. Staeheli

Frequent Co-Authors

Don Mitchell
Don Mitchell Uppsala University
Caroline R. Nagel
Caroline R. Nagel University of South Carolina
Avery M. Guest
Avery M. Guest University of Washington
Eleonore Kofman
Eleonore Kofman Middlesex University
Ron Johnston
Ron Johnston University of Bristol
Michael F. Brown
Michael F. Brown University of Arizona
Nicholas J Gill
Nicholas J Gill University of Exeter
Helga Leitner
Helga Leitner University of California, Los Angeles
Barrett A. Lee
Barrett A. Lee Pennsylvania State University
Rachel Pain
Rachel Pain Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities offer flexible options tailored to your career goals. If you are interested in advancing quickly, consider enrolling in an accelerated social work degree or a fast psychology degree. These programs help you complete your studies in less time, making it easier to enter the workforce sooner.

For students aiming for counseling or therapy roles, accreditation is important. Selecting a program from cacrep accredited universities ensures your education meets industry standards and improves your job prospects. If your interests lean toward family dynamics, affordable online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) provide accessible pathways to specialized careers.

Each route offers distinct benefits—whether it's affordability, speed, or specialized accreditation. Exploring these online options can help you match your educational path with your desired career in counseling, psychology, or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Lynn A. Staeheli

Recently Published Articles