World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
33
Citations
4450
World Ranking
7121
National Ranking
3458

Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 55 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa is affiliated with the City Of Hope National Medical Center in the United States. Their professional engagement is centered on research activities conducted within this institution.

Currently, there are no listed recent papers, specific publications, frequent co-authors, or designated venues linked to their academic output. Additionally, there is no available data concerning their main or subfields of study or the primary topics their work addresses.

No records of book publications or awards linked to Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa have been documented in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Understanding the breast cancer experience of women: A qualitative study of African American, Asian American, Latina and Caucasian cancer survivors

    Kimlin Tam Ashing-Giwa;Geraldine Padilla;Judith Tejero;Janet Kraemer

  • Understanding the Breast Cancer Experience of Latina Women

    Kimlin T Ashing-Giwa;Geraldine V Padilla;Dianne E Bohórquez;Judith S Tejero

  • The contextual model of HRQoL: a paradigm for expanding the HRQoL framework.

    Kimlin Tam Ashing-Giwa;Kimlin Tam Ashing-Giwa

  • Examining the impact of socioeconomic status and socioecologic stress on physical and mental health quality of life among breast cancer survivors.

    Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Jung-won Lim

  • Examining predictive models of HRQOL in a population-based, multiethnic sample of women with breast carcinoma

    Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Judith S. Tejero;Judith S. Tejero;Jinsook Kim;Geraldine V. Padilla

  • Health-related quality of life and culture.

    Marjorie Kagawa-Singer;Geraldine V. Padilla;Kimlin Ashing-Giwa

  • Breast cancer survivorship in a multiethnic sample: challenges in recruitment and measurement.

    Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Geraldine V. Padilla;Judith S. Tejero;Jinsook Kim

  • Health Behavior Change Models and Their Socio-Cultural Relevance for Breast Cancer Screening in African American Women

    Kimlin Ashing-Giwa

  • The impact of cervical cancer and dysplasia: a qualitative, multiethnic study.

    Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Marjorie Kagawa-Singer;Geraldine V. Padilla;Judith S. Tejero

  • Understanding the Breast Cancer Experience of African-American Women

    Kimlin Ashing-Giwa;Patricia A. Ganz

  • Diagnostic and therapeutic delays among a multiethnic sample of breast and cervical cancer survivors

    Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Patricia Gonzalez;Jung-Won Lim;Cathie Chung

  • Understanding the cultural health belief model influencing health behaviors and health-related quality of life between Latina and Asian-American breast cancer survivors

    Jung-won Lim;Patricia Gonzalez;Ming F. Wang-Letzkus;Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa

  • Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes in Long-Term Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Focus on African-American Women

    Kimlin Ashing-Giwa

  • Cervical cancer survivorship in a population based sample

    Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Judith S. Tejero;Jinsook Kim;Geraldine V. Padilla

  • Examining emotional outcomes among a multiethnic cohort of breast cancer survivors.

    Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Jung-won Lim

  • Peer-based models of supportive care: the impact of peer support groups in African American breast cancer survivors.

    Kimlin Ashing-Giwa;Carolyn Tapp;Monica Rosales;Kommah McDowell

  • Surviving cervical cancer: does health-related quality of life influence survival?

    Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa;Jung-won Lim;Julia Tang

  • Can a culturally responsive model for research design bring us closer to addressing participation disparities? Lessons learned from cancer survivorship studies.

    Kimlin Tam Ashing-Giwa

  • Is family functioning and communication associated with health-related quality of life for Chinese- and Korean-American breast cancer survivors?

    Jung-won Lim;Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa

  • Depressive symptomatology among Latina breast cancer survivors.

    Kimlin Ashing-Giwa;Monica Rosales;Lily Lai;Jeffrey Weitzel

  • Survivorship: a qualitative investigation of Latinas diagnosed with cervical cancer.

    Kimlin T Ashing-Giwa;Geraldine V Padilla;Dianne E Bohórquez;Judith S Tejero

Frequent Co-Authors

Geraldine Padilla
Geraldine Padilla University of California, San Francisco
Patricia A. Ganz
Patricia A. Ganz University of California, Los Angeles
George Somlo
George Somlo City Of Hope National Medical Center
Gerhard Hellemann
Gerhard Hellemann University of California, Los Angeles
Xiwei Wu
Xiwei Wu City Of Hope National Medical Center
Gregory A. Talavera
Gregory A. Talavera San Diego State University
John J. Rossi
John J. Rossi City Of Hope National Medical Center
Jeffrey N. Weitzel
Jeffrey N. Weitzel Natera (United States)
Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Julio Garcia-Aguilar Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities offer a wide range of online degree options tailored to today’s diverse student needs and career ambitions. If affordability is a key consideration, pursuing a cheap psychology degree online can provide a strong foundation for careers in counseling, research, or human resources, all without a hefty tuition fee.

Those interested in advanced social work practice will find that enrolling in an online msw program is an accessible pathway—especially for students seeking flexibility and supportive admissions policies. Aspiring clinical psychologists might consider specialized psyd online programs designed to prepare graduates for licensure and clinical practice.

For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, accelerated marriage and family therapy programs can help fast-track a career in therapy and mental health services. With so many online options, students can find a program that aligns with both their career pathway and lifestyle needs.

Best Scientists Citing Kimlin T. Ashing-Giwa

Recently Published Articles