World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
23
Citations
2452
World Ranking
1772
National Ranking
888

Kim L. Fridkin publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim L. Fridkin sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 17 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 67 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Kim L. Fridkin D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim L. Fridkin sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 73 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 23 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick Kenney

  • Do Negative Messages Work?: The Impact of Negativity on Citizens’ Evaluations of Candidates

    Kim Leslie Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney

  • Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective

    Miki Caul Kittilson;Kim Fridkin

  • The Role of Candidate Traits in Campaigns

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney

  • The Dimensions of Negative Messages

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney

  • The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney

  • Bad for Men, Better for Women: The Impact of Stereotypes During Negative Campaigns

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney;Gina Serignese Woodall

  • Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: How Fact-Checking Influences Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Advertising

    Kim Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney;Amanda Wintersieck

  • Capturing the Power of a Campaign Event: The 2004 Presidential Debate in Tempe

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney;Sarah Allen Gershon;Karen Shafer

  • Examining the Gender Gap in Children’s Attitudes Toward Politics

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney

  • How the Gender of U.S. Senators Influences People’s Understanding and Engagement in Politics

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney

  • Exploring the function of legitimacy: Mediating effects of personal and institutional legitimacy on leadership endorsement and system support.

    Kenneth A. Rasinski;Tom R. Tyler;Kim Fridkin

  • On the Margins of Democratic Life The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on the Political Engagement of Young People

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney;Jack Crittenden

  • The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of U.S. Senators and Constituent Communications

    Kim Fridkin;Patrick Kenney

  • Taking Aim at Attack Advertising: Understanding the Impact of Negative Campaigning in U.S. Senate Races

    Kim Fridkin;Patrick Kenney

  • The Message Matters: The Influence of Fact-Checking on Evaluations of Political Messages

    Amanda Wintersieck;Kim Fridkin;Patrick Kenney

  • Spinning Debates: The Impact of the News Media’s Coverage of the Final 2004 Presidential Debate

    Kim L. Fridkin;Patrick J. Kenney;Sarah Allen Gershon;Gina Serignese Woodall

  • Gender Differences in Reactions to Fact Checking of Negative Commercials

    Unknown

  • The Rise of Fact-Checking in American Political Campaigns

    Unknown

  • The impact of negative campaigning on citizens’ actions and attitudes

    Kim Fridkin;Patrick Kenney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles