World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
5402
World Ranking
10821
National Ranking
4502

Mathematics

D-Index
35
Citations
5209
World Ranking
2776
National Ranking
1135

Karel Culik publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karel Culik sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 169 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Karel Culik D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karel Culik sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karel Culik is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their professional profile indicates active involvement in academic research, though no specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are listed.

Details on the main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work remain unspecified, suggesting either a broad interdisciplinary approach or limited publicly available data on research focus areas.

No book publications or records of awards have been identified, implying the primary academic output might be focused on journal articles, conference papers, or other forms of scholarly communication not documented here.

The absence of recorded recent publications or a defined set of research topics limits a detailed overview of Karel Culik's contributions but does confirm an active academic affiliation and ongoing engagement in the scholarly community.

Best Publications

  • Image Compression Using Weighted Finite Automata

    Karel Culik;Jarkko Kari

  • State complexity of basic operations on finite languages

    C. Campeanu;K. Culik;Kai Salomaa;Sheng Yu

  • A note on some tree similarity measures

    Karel Culik;Derick Wood

  • On real-time cellular automata and trellis automata

    C Choffrut;K Culik

  • Undecidability of CA classification schemes

    Karel Culik;Sheng Yu

  • On the limit sets of cellular automata

    Karel Culik;Jan K. Pachl;Sheng Yu

  • Splicing semigroups of dominoes and DNA

    Karel Culik;Tero Harju

  • A Simple Universal Cellular Automaton and its One-Way and Totalistic Version.

    Jürgen Albert;Karel Culík

  • Computation theoretic aspects of cellular automata

    Unknown

  • The decidability of the equivalence problem for DOL-systems*

    Karel Culik;Ivan Fris

  • Finite Automata Computing Real Functions

    Karel Culik;Juhani Karhumaki

  • Systolic trellis automatat

    Karel Culik;Jozef Gruska;Arto Salomaa

  • The topological entropy of cellular automata is uncomputable

    Lyman P. Hurd;Jarkko Kari;Karel Culik

  • Digital images and formal languages

    Karel Culik;Jarkko Kari

  • A Purely Homomorphic Characterization of Recursively Enumerable Sets

    K. Culik

  • On the decidability of homomorphism equivalence for languages

    Karel Culik;Arto Salomaa

  • LR-Regular Grammars - an Extension of LR(k) Grammars

    Unknown

  • Systems of equations over a free monoid and Ehrenfeucht's conjecture

    Karel Culik;Juhani Karhumäki

  • The Equivalence of Finite Valued Transducers (on HDTOL Languages) is Decidable

    Karel Culik;Juhani Karhumäki

  • An Aperiodic Set of Wang Cubes

    Karel Culik;Jarkko Kari

  • A NOTE ON SYNCHRONIZED AUTOMATA AND ROAD COLORING PROBLEM

    Karel Culik;Juhani Karhumäki;Jarkko Kari

  • On real time and linear time cellular automata

    Walter Bucher;Karel Culik

Frequent Co-Authors

Juhani Karhumäki
Juhani Karhumäki University of Turku
Arto Salomaa
Arto Salomaa Turku Centre for Computer Science
Michael A. Arbib
Michael A. Arbib University of Southern California
Oscar H. Ibarra
Oscar H. Ibarra University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, there are several related online degree options that can complement their analytical skills and open up diverse career pathways. Many professionals consider advancing their education with business degrees that emphasize quantitative reasoning and financial expertise.

If you're curious about what mba programs can i get into, it’s worth exploring options that balance accessibility with quality. Some programs are designed to be more flexible and straightforward, making them great choices for math graduates looking to enhance their leadership skills.

Among these, easy online mba programs provide convenient routes for busy individuals seeking career growth without compromising their current commitments. These programs often offer practical coursework that leverages mathematical problem-solving in business contexts.

For those interested in higher-level executive education, exploring dba programs can be beneficial. These doctoral programs focus on applying research to business challenges and can lead to roles in academia, consultancy, or senior management.

Another promising avenue is finance, where an online masters in finance programs can build on a Math degree’s strengths. Graduates can pursue careers in investment banking, risk management, or financial analysis, capitalizing on their quantitative background.

Best Scientists Citing Karel Culik

Recently Published Articles