World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
74
Citations
34559
World Ranking
1455
National Ranking
759

Jonathan S. Turner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan S. Turner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 249 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jonathan S. Turner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan S. Turner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan S. Turner is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily in medicine and engineering, with a focus on subfields such as surgery, biomedical engineering, molecular biology, rheumatology, and reproductive medicine. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in their diverse publication record and research topics.

The scientist has contributed to key topics including:

  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Hernia repair and management
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Graph theory and CDMA systems
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders

Jonathan S. Turner's recent published papers demonstrate an integration of biomedical applications and mathematical theory. Notable publications include:

  • "Assembled Cell-Decorated Collagen (AC-DC) Fiber Bioprinted Implants with Musculoskeletal Tissue Properties Promote Functional Recovery in Volumetric Muscle Loss," 2021, published in Advanced Healthcare Materials
  • "Multifunctional, Low Friction, Antimicrobial Approach for Biomaterial Surface Enhancement," 2020, published in ACS Applied Bio Materials
  • "Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model," 2022, published in Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • "Counting the decimation classes of binary vectors with relatively prime length and density," 2020, published in Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics
  • "Legendre pairs of lengthsℓ≡ 0 (mod 5)," 2023, published in Special Matrices

Their work has appeared in several recurring publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • Advanced Healthcare Materials
  • ACS Applied Bio Materials
  • Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics
  • Special Matrices

Collaboration is a part of their research process, with frequent coauthors such as Dursun A. Bulutoglu, Kyle Christensen, Kelly Coughenour, Yas Maghdouri-White, and Anna Bulysheva. These coauthors have contributed to multiple projects alongside the scientist, indicating ongoing research partnerships in their fields of interest.

Best Publications

  • OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks

    Nick McKeown;Tom Anderson;Hari Balakrishnan;Guru Parulkar

  • Overcoming the Internet impasse through virtualization

    T. Anderson;L. Peterson;S. Shenker;J. Turner

  • New directions in communications (or which way to the information age

    J.S. Turner

  • Terabit burst switching

    Jonathan S. Turner

  • Scalable high speed IP routing lookups

    Marcel Waldvogel;George Varghese;Jon Turner;Bernhard Plattner

  • ClassBench: a packet classification benchmark

    David E. Taylor;Jonathan S. Turner

  • Algorithms to accelerate multiple regular expressions matching for deep packet inspection

    Sailesh Kumar;Sarang Dharmapurikar;Fang Yu;Patrick Crowley

  • Design of a broadcast packet switching network

    J.S. Turner

  • Fast hash table lookup using extended bloom filter: an aid to network processing

    Haoyu Song;Sarang Dharmapurikar;Jonathan Turner;John Lockwood

  • Diversifying the Internet

    J.S. Turner;D.E. Taylor

  • Efficient Mapping of Virtual Networks onto a Shared Substrate

    Jing Lu;Jonathan Turner

  • Packet classification using extended TCAMs

    E. Spitznagel;D. Taylor;J. Turner

  • Routing in overlay multicast networks

    S.Y. Shi;J.S. Turner

  • Design of a gigabit ATM switch

    T. Chaney;J.A. Fingerhut;M. Flucke;J.S. Turner

  • The vertex separation and search number of a graph

    J. A. Ellis;I. H. Sudborough;J. S. Turner

  • Reprogrammable network packet processing on the field programmable port extender (FPX)

    John W. Lockwood;Naji Naufel;Jon S. Turner;David E. Taylor

  • Bandwidth management and congestion control scheme for multicast ATM networks

    Jonathan S. Turner

  • Supercharging planetlab: a high performance, multi-application, overlay network platform

    Jonathan S. Turner;Patrick Crowley;John DeHart;Amy Freestone

  • Fast packet switch

    Jonathan Shields Turner

  • Advanced algorithms for fast and scalable deep packet inspection

    Sailesh Kumar;Jonathan Turner;John Williams

  • Design of a broadcast packet switching network

    Jonathan S. Turner

Frequent Co-Authors

John W. Lockwood
John W. Lockwood Algo-Logic Systems
Tilman Wolf
Tilman Wolf University of Massachusetts Amherst
Subhash Suri
Subhash Suri University of California, Santa Barbara
Michael Mitzenmacher
Michael Mitzenmacher Harvard University
Fillia Makedon
Fillia Makedon The University of Texas at Arlington
George Varghese
George Varghese University of California, Los Angeles
Scott Shenker
Scott Shenker University of California, Berkeley
Larry L. Peterson
Larry L. Peterson Princeton University
Thomas Anderson
Thomas Anderson University of Washington
Douglas C. Schmidt
Douglas C. Schmidt William & Mary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to many related online degree options that can broaden your career possibilities. Many students choose to specialize further by pursuing a cybersecurity degree online, a field critical for protecting digital information and ensuring data privacy. Cybersecurity experts are in high demand, making this an attractive pathway for computer science graduates.

Other options include degrees that support technology-driven industries. For example, an affordable online construction management degree blends IT with building processes, ideal for those interested in digital project management in construction.

If your interests align with public safety, a criminal justice degree can tie your computer science background to careers in cybersecurity, law enforcement, or digital forensics.

Finally, for those drawn to analytics and business, tough competition makes online accounting classes a good complement to coding and data management skills.

By exploring these related online programs, you can tailor your learning and enhance your career flexibility in today’s tech-centered job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan S. Turner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles